Work-home interaction and psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic: The mediation effect of cyberloafing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26555/humanitas.v18i2.18603Keywords:
COVID-19, cyberloafing, psychological distress, work from home, work-home interaction.Abstract
Work from home is one of the policies chosen by the government due to the COVID -19 pandemic; however, work-home interactions (WHIs) can place a burden on one domain. This study aimed to examine the relationship between the dimensions of WHIs and psychological distress and how cyberloafing mediates this relationship. Data were collected with an online survey tool from 2,349 participants who worked at a government institution in Indonesia with employees across the country to test the proposed hypothesis. The results show that all forms of WHIs cause psychological distress. Further, a high level of negative work-home interactions (NWHIs) and negative home-work interactions (NHWIs) increase psychological distress. Conversely, a high level of positive work-home interactions (PWHIs) and positive home-work interactions (PHWIs) reduce psychological distress. In addition, this studys results also show that cyberloafing mediates the relationships between NWHIs, NHWIs, PWHIs, and psychological distress. This study implies the organization need to provide mental support and technology support to ensure the work of employees effective. Organizations also need to support employees to reduce work-family conflict.
References
Abbey, J. D., & Meloy, M. G. (2017). Attention by design: Using attention checks to detect inattentive respondents and improve data quality. Journal of Operations Management, 5356(1), 6370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2017.06.001
Abubakar, A. M. (2018). Linking work-family interference, workplace incivility, gender and psychological distress. Journal of Management Development, 37(3), 226242. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-06-2017-0207
Akbulut, Y., Dursun, O. O., Donmez, O., & Sahin, Y. L. (2016). In search of a measure to investigate cyberloafing in educational settings. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 616625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb/2015.11.002
Andel, S. A., Kessler, S. R., Pindek, S., Kleinman, G., & Spector, P. E. (2019). Is cyberloafing more complex than we originally thought? Cyberloafing as a coping response to workplace aggression exposure. Computers in Human Behavior, 101, 124130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.013
Baskaran, S., Nedunselian, N., Mahadi, N., & Mahmood, Z. (2019). An epidemic phenomenon of workplace cyberloafing: Investigations and implications. International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion, 10(4), 357-371. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWOE.2019.106894
Bilodeau, J., Marchand, A., & Demers, A. (2019). Work, family, work-family conflict and psychological distress: A revisited look at the gendered vulnerability pathways. Stress and Health, 36(1), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2916
Bowen, P., Govender, R., Edwards, P., & Catell, K. (2018). Work-related contact, work-family conflict, psychological distress and sleep problems experienced by construction professionals: An integrated explanatory model. Construction Management and Economics, 36(3), 153-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2017.1341638
Cerrato, J., & Cifre, E. (2018). Gender inequality in household chores and work-family conflict. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(1330). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01330
Chang, L. (1994). A psychometric evaluation of 4-Point and 6-Point Likert-type scales in relation to reliability and validity. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18(3), 205-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662169401800302
Darouei, M., & Pluut, H. (2021). Work from home today for a better tomorrow! How working from home influences work-family conflict and employees' start of the next workday. Stress and Health, Online First. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.3053
Davis, K. D., Gere, J., & Sliwinski, M. J. (2017). Investigating the work-family conflict and health link: Repetitive thought as a mechanism. Stress and Health, 33(4), 330-338. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2711
Delanoeije, J., Verbruggen, M., & Germeys, L. (2019). Boundary role transitions: A day-to-day approach to explain the effects of home-based telework on work-to-home conflict and home-to-work conflict. Human Relations, 72(12), 1843-1868. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718823071
Douven, I. (2018). A Bayesian perspective on Likert scales and central tendency. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 25(3), 1203-1211. https://doi.org/10.3578/s13423-017-1344-2
Eddleston, K. A, & Mulki, J. (2015). Toward understanding remote workers' management of work-family boundaries: The complexity of workplace embeddedness. Group and Organization Management, 42(3), 346-387. https://doi.org/10.117/1059601115619548
Geurts, S. A. E., Taris, T. W., Kompier, M. A. J., Dikkers, J. S. E., VanHooff, M. L. M., & Kinnunen, U. M. (2005). Work-home interaction from a work psychological perspective: Development and validation of a new questionnaire, the SWING. Work and Stress, 19(4), 319-339. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370500410208
Gummer, T., Roßmann, J., & Silber, H. (2018). Using instructed response items as attention checks in web surveys: Properties and implementation. Sociological Methods and Research, 50(1), 238-264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124118769083
Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression - based approach. The Guilford Press.
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.
Islam, F. M. A. (2019). Psychological distress and its association with socio-demographic factors in a rural district in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study. PloS One, 14(3), e0212765. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212765
Kalyar, M. N., Saeed, M., Usta, A., & Shafique, I. (2021). Workplace cyberbullying and creativity: Examining the roles of psychological distress and psychological capital. Management Research Review, 44(4), 607–624. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-03-
-0130
Kementerian Dalam Negeri. (2021). Instruksi Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 3 Tahun 2021 (Instruction of the Minister of Home Affairs Number 3 of 2021). Kementerian Dalam Negeri.
Kessler, R. C., Andrews, G., Colpe, L. J., Hiripi, E., Mroczek, D. K., Normand, S. L. T., ... Zaslavsky, A. M. (2002). Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine, 32(6), 959-976. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291702006074
Kim, S., & Hollensbe, E. (2018). When work comes home: Technology-related pressure and home support. Human Resource Development International, 21(2), 91-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2017.1366177
Klumb, P. L., Voelkle, M. C., & Siegler, S. (2017). How negative social interactions at work seep into the home: A prosocial and an antisocial pathway. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(5), 629-649. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2154
Koay, K. Y., & Soh, P. C. H. (2018). Should cyberloafing be allowed in the workplace? Human Resource Management International Digest, 26(7), 4-6. https://doi.org/10.1108/HRMID-05-2018-0107
Koay, K. Y., Soh, P. C. H., & Chew, K. W. (2017). Do employees' private demands lead to cyberloafing? The mediating role of job stress. Management Research Review, 40(9), 1025-1038. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-11-2016-0252
Kung, F. Y. H., Kwok, N., & Brown, D. J. (2018). Are attention check questions a threat to scale validity? Applied Psychology, 67(2), 264-283. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12108
Kyron, M. J., Rikkers, W., LaMontagne, A., Bartlett, J., & Lawrence, D. (2019). Work-related and nonwork stressors, PTSD, and psychological distress: Prevalence and attributable burden among Australian police and emergency services employees. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000536
Laba, K., & Geldenhuys, M. (2018). Positive interaction between work and home, and psychological availability on women’s work engagement: A ‘shortitudinal’ study. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 44(0), a1538. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v44i0.1538
Lim, V. K. G., & Chen, D. J. Q. (2012). Cyberloafing at the workplace: Gain or drain on work? Behaviour and Information Technology, 31(4), 343-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290903353054
Liu, C., Cao, J., Zhang, P., & Wu, G. (2020). Investigating the relationship between work-to-family conflict, job burnout, job outcomes, and affective commitment in the construction industry. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(16), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165995
McLachlan, K. J. J., & Gale, C. R. (2018). The effects of psychological distress and its interaction with socioeconomic position on risk of developing four chronic diseases. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 109, 79-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2018.04.004
Mercado, B. K., Giordano, C., & Dilchert, S. (2017). A meta-analytic investigation of cyberloafing. Career Development International, 22(5), 546-564. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-08-2017-0142
Merson, F., Newby, J., Shires, A., Millard, M., & Mahoney, A. (2021). The temporal stability of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale. Australian Psychologist, 56(1), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050067.2021.1893603
Nakrosiene, A., Buciuniene, I., Gostautaite, B. (2019). Working from home: Characteristics and outcomes of telework. International Journal of Manpower, 40(1), 87-101. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-07-2017-0172
Odle-Dusseau, H. N., Hammer, L. B., Crain, T. L., & Bodner, T. E. (2016). The influence of family-supportive supervisor training on employee job performance and attitudes: An organizational work-family intervention. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21(3), 296-308. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039961
Oshio, T, Inoue, A., & Tsutsumi, A. (2017). Examining the mediating effect of work-to-family conflict on the associations between job stressors and employee psychological distress: A prospective cohort study. BMJ Open, 7(8), e015608. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015608
Perry, J. L., Nicholls, A. R., Clough, P. J., & Crust, L. (2015). Assessing model fit: Caveats and recommendations for confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory structural equation modeling. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 19(1), 12-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2014.952370
Pindek, S., Krajcevska, A., & Spector, P. E. (2018). Cyberloafing as a coping mechanism: Dealing with workplace boredom. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 147-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.040
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539-569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
Rothmann, S., & Baumann, C. (2014). Employee engagement: The effects of work-home/home-work interaction and psychological conditions. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 17(4), 515-530. https://doi.org/10.4102/SAJEMS.V1714.419
Russ, T. C., Stamatakis, E., Hamer, M., Starr, J. M., Kivimäki, M., & Batty, G. D. (2012). Association between psychological distress and mortality: Individual participant pooled analysis of 10 prospective cohort studies. BMJ, 345, e4933. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e4933
Sousa, V. D., & Rojjanasrirat, W. (2011). Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: A clear and user-friendly guideline. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17(2), 268-274. https://doi.org/10.1111.j.1365-2573.2010.01434.x
Speights, S. L., Bochantin, J. E., & Cowan, R. L. (2020). Feeling, expressing, and managing emotions in work-family conflict. Journal of Business and Psychology, 35(3), 363-380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-019-09626-x
Uddin, M. N., Islam, F. M. A., & AlMahmud, A. (2018). Psychometric evaluation of an interview-administered version of the Kessler 10-item questionnaire (K10) for measuring psychological distress in rural Bangladesh. BMJ Open, 8(6), e022967. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022967
van der Lippe, T., Lippényi, Z. (2020). Beyond formal access: Organizational context, working from home, and work–family conflict of men and women in European workplaces. Indicators Research, 151(2), 383–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1993-1
World Health Organization. (2020). WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 - 11 March 2020. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020
Wu, H., & Chen, Y. (2020). The impact of work from home ( WFH ) on workload and productivity in terms of different tasks and occupations. In: Stephanidis C. et al. (Eds). In HCI International 2020 – Late Breaking Papers: Interaction, Knowledge and Social Media. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol 12427. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60152-2_52
Zhou, M., Zhang, J., Li, F., & Chen, C. (2020). Work-family conflict and depressive symptoms among Chinese employees: Cross-level interaction of organizational justice climate and family flexibility. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(19), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17196954
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic License.
