Kesantunan berbahasa para Kader Posyandu dalam pelaksanaan layanan informasi

Authors

  • Endang Wiyanti Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
  • Yulian Dinihari Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
  • Solihatun Solihatun Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26555/bahastra.v39i1.12031

Keywords:

kesantunan berbahasa, tindak tutur, kader Posyandu

Abstract

The purpose of this study was (1) to describe the type of speech acts of Posyandu cadres Mawar VII and Posyandu Mawar IX Pademangan Barat North Jakarta in the information service process. (2) describe the principle of courtesy in Posyandu Mawar VII and Posyandu Mawar IX Pademangan Barat North Jakarta when the information service process takes place. The data used in this study are oral and written. Oral and written data is obtained by recording and recording the utterances of the cadres when carrying out information services. Data collection techniques in this study were carried out by referring to proficient free technique, recording techniques, and note taking techniques. The results of this study are that cadres do more polite speech acts using directive, representative, commissive, expressive, and declaration speeches. Second, cadres use four maxims, namely (1) wisdom maxim, (2) generosity maxim, (3) praise maxim, and (4) consensus maxim.

References

Aziz, E. A. (2000). Refusing in Indonesian: Strategies and Politeness Implications. Disertasi, Australia: Monash University.

--------. (2008). Horison Baru Teori Kesantunan Berbahasa: Membingkai yang Terserak, Menggugat yang Semu, Menuju Universalisme yang Hakiki. Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar, Indonesia: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Budiwati, T. R. (2017). “Kesantunan Berbahasa Mahasiswa dalam Berinteraksi dengan Dosen di Universitas Ahmad Dahlan: Analisis Pragmatikâ€-2017. www.lpp.uad.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/72.-tri-rina-budi-557-571.pdf

Gunarwan, A. (1994). â€Pragmatik: Pandangan Mata Burungâ€. Di dalam Mengiring Rekan Sejati: Festschrift Buat Pak Ton. Soenjono Dardjowidjojo. Hlm: 37—60. Jakarta: Universitas Atma Jaya.

Leech, G. (1993). Prinsip-Prinsip Pragmatik. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

Markhamah, dkk. Analisis Kesalahan dan Kesantunan Berbahasa. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press, 2011.

Nordquist, R. “Pragmatics (Language). Glossary of Grammatical and Rhetorical Termsâ€. Accessed on January 16, 2019 at 03.30 p.m. http://grammar.about.com/od/pq/g/prag maticsterm.htm

Uddin, A. (2012) “Strategi Kesantunan Berbahasa Indonesia Warga Kampus Universitas Jambi dalam Meminimalkan Paksaan kepada Petuturâ€. http://journal.unbari.ac.id/index.php/JI P/article/view/69.

Rahardi, K. (2005). Pragmatik Kesantunan Imperatif Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Rustono. (1999). Pokok-pokok Pragmatik. Semarang: CV IKIP Semarang Press.

Syahrul. (2008). Pragmatik Kesantunan Berbahasa: Menyibak Fenomena Berbahasa Indonesia Guru dan Siswa. Padang: UNP Press.

Sofa. (2011). Tindak Tutur. http://massofa.wordpress.com/2011/01/18/tindak-tutur, diunduh 12 Februari 2019).

Wijana, I.D.P. (1996). Dasar- Dasar Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Wijaya, A. “Brown and Levinson’s Politeness Strategiesâ€. 2015. http://awinlanguage.blogspot.co.id/2013/0 5/brown-and-levinsons-politeness.html

Yule, G. (2006). Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Downloads

Published

2019-04-30

Issue

Section

Articles