THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SCRAMBLE LEARNING MODEL ON STUDENTS MATHEMATICS LEARNING OUTCOMES IN CLASS VII
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/admathedust.v7i1.20152Keywords:
effectiveness, Scramble, learning outcomesAbstract
SMP Muhammadiyah 1 Minggir is one of the schools whose learning result of mathematics is still low. The learning process used is still teacher-centered and less varied. This makes the student's lack of attention to the teacher's explanations in the classroom learning. One of the learning models that focuses students' attention on teacher explanation is the Scramble learning model. The purpose of this study to determine the effectiveness of learning models between students who use the Scramble learning model to students in class VII odd semester junior high school (SMP) of Muhammadiyah 1 Minggir Sleman District Academic Year 2019/2020. This study population is the seven graders of junior high school Muhammadiyah 1 Minggir Sleman District Academic Year 2019/2020, which consists of seven classes. The technique of sampling research used a random sampling technique that is by lottery. The classes obtained are class VII B as the experimental class using the Scramble learning model and VII C as the control class using the direct learning model. Methods of data collection using the method of documentation of students' initial ability and test. Research instruments consisting of interviews with teachers and students, observations, and multichoice mathematical test results. Data analysis used is a prerequisite analysis test consisting of normality test and homogeneity test, then a hypothesis test using t-test the first hypothesis and t-test the second hypothesis. The significant level of 5% and DF = 62 show that: (1) there are differences in students mathematics learning outcomes using Scramble and mathematics learning outcomes of students who use direct learning. This was evidenced by the value of tcount = and ttable = , so that tcount > ttable means rejecting H0. (2) Mathematic learning of students who used the Scramble learning model was more effective than students who used direct learning on mathematics learning outcomes. The value of tcount = evidenced this and ttable = , so that tcount > ttable means that rejecting H0.
References
Huda, Miftahul. (2016). Model-Model Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran: Isu-Isu Metodis dan Paradigmatis. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Mulyasa, E. (2005). Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Rusman. (2012). Model-model Pembelajaran Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.
Shoimin, Aris. (2014). 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Trianto. (2012). Model Pembelajaran Terpadu. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with AdMathEduSt: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License