THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL TYPE OF STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION AND THINK PAIR SHARE TOWARD MATHEMATICS LEARNING OUTCOMES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/admathedust.v6i10.19348Keywords:
effectiveness, STAD, TPS, mathematics learning outcomesAbstract
The mathematics learning in class VII MTsN 2 Yogyakarta is still centered on a teacher. Students assume that mathematics is a difficult subject resulting in the students' mathematics learning result. The learning by using cooperative learning model types of Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) and TPS are expected to improve the students' mathematics learning result. This research aims to determine whether there are significant differences between the students' mathematics learning results who are taught using the STAD method and using the Think pair Share(TPS) method, which is better for the students' mathematics learning result, STAD method, or TPS method. This research population is all the students of class VII State Islamic Junior High School (MTsN) 2 Yogyakarta, consisting of seven classes. Meanwhile, the sample in this research there is two classes determined by random sampling. The research sample is class VII B as experiment class A with the STAD method, and class VII D as experiment class B with the Think Pair And Share (TPS) method. This research instrument is a test of mathematics learning results. It is analyzed by using the validity test, distinguishing power, and reliability. Then, data analysis uses t-test two parties and t-test one party. Based on the analysis of the first hypothesis test is t-test two parties on the students' mathematics learning result with significance degree of 5%, and freedom degree of 64 obtained ð‘¡count= 4,0479, and ð‘¡ð‘¡able=1,99894, then ð‘¡count > ð‘¡ð‘¡able so that there is a significant difference between the students' mathematics learning result who are taught by using STAD method and by using TPS method, and the second hypothesis test is t-test one party with significance degree of 5%. Freedom degree of 64 obtained ð‘¡count= 4,0479, and ð‘¡ð‘¡able=1,669525, then ð‘¡count > ð‘¡ð‘¡able so that the STAD method is better than the TPS method of on the students' mathematics learning result.
References
Isjoni. 2009. Cooperative Learning Efektifitas Pembelajaran Kelompok. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Rusman. 2016. Model – model Pembelajaran :Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Slavin, Robert E. 2005.Cooperative Learning Teori, Riset dan Praktik. Bandung: Nusa Media.
Uno, Hamzah B. 2009. Model Pembelajaran: Menciptakan Proses Belajar Mengajar yang Kreatif dan Efektif. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with AdMathEduSt: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
