THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PAIR CHECK TYPE OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL AND THE THINK PAIR SHARE ON THE LEARNING OUTCOMES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/admathedust.v6i5.19261Keywords:
Effectiveness, Pair Check, Think Pair Share, and Mathematics Learning Outcomes.Abstract
This study aims to determine whether or not the differences between mathematics learning outcomes with cooperative learning model of pair check and think pair share types and to compare the effectiveness of the two types in mathematics learning outcomes of students grade VII in even semester at Junior High School (SMP) Muhammadiyah 9 Yogyakarta in the academic year 2018/2019. This study is an experimental research that consists of experimental class 1 and experimental 2. The population is the student's class VII at SMP Muhammadiyah 9 Yogyakarta in 2018/2019. The sample was taken from 2 classes using a purposive sampling technique. The data collection technique in this study was using a method of learning outcomes tests and documentation. Before analyzing the data, a prerequisite test consisting of a normality test and testing the hypothesis in this study, two parties t-test were used with a significance level of 5%. The research outcomes at a significance level of 5% and df = 53 indicate no difference in mathematics learning outcomes using the cooperative learning model type of pair check with mathematics learning model type of think pair share. This is supported by the results of data analysis from the hypothesis test using the t-test. The results are , so it can be concluded that , so H0 is accepted, and H1 is rejected.
References
Arikunto,Suharsimi. 2013. Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.
________________. 2014. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta : PT Rineka Cipta.
Isjoni. 2012. Pembelajaran kooperatif meningkatkan kecerdasan komunikasi antar peserta didik. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.
____. 2013. “Cooperative Learning Mengembangkan Kemampuan Belajar Berkelompok. Bandung : Alfabeta.
Mulyatiningsih, Endang. 2014. Metode Penelitian Terapan Bidang Pendidikan. Bandung : Alfabeta.
Shoimin, Aris. 2016. 68 Model Pembelajaran novatif dalam Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta : Ar-Ruz Media.
Sudjana, Nana. 2012. Penilaian Hasil Proses belajar mengajar. Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sugiyono. 2018. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitaif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung : Alfabeta.
Suryabrata, Sumadi. 1985. Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta : CV. Rajawali.
Trianto. 2011. Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif-Progresif: Konsep, Landasan, dan Implementasinya pada Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Nasional (KTSP). Jakarta : Kencana.
UNDANG-UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NO. 14 TAHUN 2005 dan PERATURAN PEMERINTAH RI NO. 74 TAHUN 2008 tentang GURU dan Dosen, 2009, Bandung : Citra Umbara ( hal. 59 dan 64 ).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with AdMathEduSt: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
