THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MATHEMATICS LEARNING BASED ON OPEN-ENDED WITH PROBLEM BASED LEARNING METHOD ON CREATIVE THINKING ABILITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/admathedust.v6i4.19234Keywords:
Effectiveness, Open-ended, PBL method, Conventional method.Abstract
Learning tends to be dominated by teachers, which causes some students to be passive in learning. This is thought to make the level of students' creative thinking skills low. This study aims to determine whether there are differences in the level of creative thinking abilities of students who use Open-ended based learning with Problem Based Learning (PBL) methods with those using Conventional learning methods for students' creative thinking skills of VIII Grande students of State Junior High School (SMP Negeri) 2 Majenang Cilacap Regency At Odd Semester In Academic Year of 2018/2019. The population in this study there are eight classes. The sample was taken by two classes with a random sampling technique for the class and selected VIII-G class as the control class and VIII-H as the experimental class. The design in this study is the Pretest-Posttest Control Group design. Data collection techniques using test techniques (pretest and posttest) and questionnaire techniques. Data collection instruments in the form of tests and test questionnaires. Test data collection instruments using validity, discriminating power, and reliability tests. Data analysis techniques using analysis prerequisite tests include normality test, homogeneity test, and hypothesis testing using the t-test. The study results at a significant level of 5%, and df = 61 indicate that: (1) there is a difference in the value of posttest mathematics using open-ended-based learning with problem-based learning (PBL) method with learning using conventional methods. This is indicated by ttable = t (0,025) (61) = 1,996 and tcount = 2,988762 which means ttable< tcount(2) Learning using Open-ended PBL method is more effective than learning using conventional methods. This is indicated by the value of tcount = 2.988762 and ttable = t (0.025) (61) = 1.670385 which means tcount>ttable .
References
Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2012). Dasar Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (Edisi 2). Jakarta: PT.Rineka Cipta.
Depdiknas.(2006). PERMENDIKNAS No 22 Tahun 2006 tentang Standar Isi untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. [online]. Tersedia: https://asafts63.wordpress.com/2011/01/permendiknas-no-22-tahun-2006-standar-isi.pdf. Diakses dari laman web tanggal 10 januari 2017
Hudojo, Herman. (2005). Pengembangan Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran Matematika. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang Press
Ibrahim, M & Nur, M. (2000). Pengajaran Berdasarkan Masalah. Surabaya: University Press
Isjoni. (2011). Pembelajaran Kooperatif, Meningkatkan Kecerdasan Komunikasi antar Peserta Didik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Mardapi, Djemari. (2008). Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Tes dan Non-tes. Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendekia
Ngalimun. (2013). Strategi dan Model Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Aswaja
Purwanto. (2014). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Putro Widoyo, Eko. (2016). Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Rusman. (2014). Model-model Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rajawali Press
Sanjaya, Wina. (2007). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenamedia Group
Sitiatava. (2012). Desain Belajar Mengajar Kreatif Berbasis Sains. Yogyakarta: DIVA Press
Sudjana. (2003). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT.Remaja Rosdakarya
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: PT.Alfabet
Suherman, E dkk. (2003). Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Kontemporer. Bandung: PT.Remaja Rosdakarya
Suparman. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: MIPA UAD
Suryabrata, Sumandi. (2012). Metodologi Penelitan. Jakarta: RajagrafindoPersada
Widoyoko, Putro Eko. (2016). Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Yaumi, M. (2012). Pembelajaran Berbasis Multiple Intellegency. Jakarta: Dian Rakyat.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with AdMathEduSt: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License