THE ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT ITEMS TEST OF MATH SUBJECT IN MIDTERM ON ODD SEMESTER OF XI IPS 2 CLASS STUDENTS AT SMA

Authors

  • Lisa Octaviani Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
  • Anggit Prabowo Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/admathedust.v6i2.18816

Keywords:

Midterm test questions analysis, validity, power difference, difficulty index, reliability

Abstract

The test instrument for the odd midterm assessment questions in the XI grade of the social science class of mathematics subjects has not yet been analyzed for its characteristics. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the characteristics of midterm assessment items of the mathematic subject in State Senior High School (SMA Negeri) 1 Ngaglik. The research is a research with post facto with a quantitative descriptive approach with subjects, namely the instrument items for midterm assessment questions in the form of open questions as many as five questions. The research object is a twentieth grade in SMA Negeri 1 Ngaglik that consists of 32 students. An analyzing data used Microsoft excel on manually of validity, power difference difficulty index, and reliability. The result showed that: 1) midterm test instrument of mathematics subjects are categorized very high, which means the items are valid with a V-Aiken index value of 1 for each; 2) from 5 questions, the difficulty index obtained was one which was categorized as an easy question and four moderate questions; 3) from 5 questions, two questions have good power difference category, and three questions were categorized sufficient; 4) the reliability obtained was 0,501 which was categorized as medium.

References

Arifin, Zaenal. 2012. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan islam Kementrian Agama RI

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2013. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Asrul, R. Ananda and Rosnita. 2014. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Medan: Citapustaka Media

Azwar, Saifuddin. 2010. Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Hendryadi. 2014. Content Validity. Teori Online Personal Paper. 01:1-5.

Leonard. 2015. Kompetensi Tenaga Pendidik Indonesia: Analisis Dampak Rendahnya Kualitas SDM Guru dan Solusi Perbaikannya. Jurnal Formatif, 5(3):192-201

Mehta, Gyata, and Varsha Mokhasi. 2014 Item Analysis of Multiple Choice- an Assessment of the Assessment Tool. International Journal of Health Sciences and Research. 4: 197-202.

Pemerintah Indonesia. 2005. Undang-Undang Republik Idonesia Nomor 14 tahun 2005 Tentang Guru dan Dosen. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara.

Pemerintah Indonesia. 2013. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 66 tahun 2013 Tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara.

Prabowo,Anggit. 2016. Analisis Butir Soal Ujian Akhir Semester Mata Kuliah Analisis Kurikulum dan Materi Pembelajaran Matematika SMA: The Progressive and Fun Education Seminar.

Purwanto. 2009. Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Sabri, Shafizan. 2013. Item Analysis Of Student Comprehensive Test For Research In Teaching Beginner String Ensemble Using Model-Based Teaching Among Music Students In Public University. International Journal of Education and Research. 01:1-14

Santoso, Yohan. 2013. Analisis Butir Soal Ujian Tengah Semester Ganjil Mata Diklat Teori Produktif Untuk Siswa Kelas X SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Bantul 2012/2013. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Sudijono, Anas. 2011. Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Downloads

Published

2019-02-27

Issue

Section

Articles