THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE USE OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL TYPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) ON THE MATHEMATICS PROBLEM SOLVING ABILITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/admathedust.v5i8.17892Keywords:
effectiveness, Think Pair Share (TPS), math problem-solving ability.Abstract
The learning process centered on teachers has resulted in a lack of mathematical problem-solving ability. This study aims to determine (1) To know the differences of student's ability to solve mathematics problems by using a cooperative learning model of TPS type and students taught using the Direct learning model, (2) Effectiveness of TPS type cooperative learning model compared to Direct learning model. This type of research uses quantitative research methods. This study's population is the students of class VII Semester II Muhammadiyah Junior High School 1 Yogyakarta (SMP Muhammadiyah 1 Yogyakarta) academic year 2016/2017. Sampling was done by random sampling to class, selected class VII F as experiment class, and VII G as control class. The technique of collecting data by a test method. This research instrument is a math problem-solving test in the form of a description problem. Data analysis used was a t-test, normality test using the Chi-Square formula, and homogeneity test using the Bartlet test with a 5% significant level. Hypothesis test in this research uses two parties, t-test and one party t-test with a 5% significant level. Based on the results of this study at a significant level of 5% and degrees of freedom 62, then obtained: (1) count and ttable  obtained tcount> ttable, so rejected. Then there are differences in the problem-solving skills of students whom mathematics using the cooperative learning model of TPS type with students who are using the Direct learning model. (2) count   and ttable  obtained tcount > ttable so rejected. So it can be concluded that the model of cooperative learning TPS type is more effective than the direct learning model to the problem-solving ability of mathematics.
References
Agus Suprijono. 2009. Cooperative Learning. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Ahmad Susanto. 2013. Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran di Sekoah Dasar. Jakarta: Kencana.
Abdul Majid. 2013. Strategi Pembelajaran. Bandung: Rosda.
Sudjana. 2002. Metoda Statistika. Bandung: Tarsito.
Suparman. 2013. Stastitika Matematika. Yogyakarta: MIPA UAD Press.
Uba Umbara. Indikator Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa (Dalam Kajian). (http://www.ubaumbara.com/2016/10/indikator-kemampuan-pemecahan-masalah.html). Diakses 22 Maret 2017 Pukul 12:09.
Udin S. Winataputra, dkk. 1992. Materi Pokok Strategi Belaja Mengajar Matematika. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with AdMathEduSt: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License