THE EFFECTIVENESS OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL TYPE OF THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) TOWARD MATHEMATICS LEARNING INTERACTION IN CLASS VII
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/admathedust.v5i5.17397Keywords:
Cooperative Learning Model Think Pair Share (TPS) Type, Direct Learning Model, Learning Mathematics Interaction of StudentsAbstract
Based on the result of interviews and observations, I found the problem that became the reason for this research. One of that is the learning model commonly used in Muhammadiyah Junior High School 1 Yogyakarta (SMP Muhammadiyah 1 Yogyakarta) has not been optimal to create mathematics learning interaction of students. This research aims to determine (1) the presence or absence of difference in mathematics learning interaction between a student is taught using cooperative learning model Think Pair Share (TPS) type with students taught using direct learning model and (2) which learning model is more effective between cooperative learning model Think Pair Share (TPS) type with direct learning model toward mathematics learning interaction of students. The type of this research is quantitative research, using experimental design. The population in this research was the students of regular class VII in SMP Muhammadiyah 1 Yogyakarta, even semester academic year 2016/2017. Research sampling done by random sampling toward class, selected VII F class as the experimental class, and VII G class as the control class. Technique data collection using the observation method. The prerequisite analysis test used a normality test using the Chi-square formula and homogeneity test using the Bartlett test. Data analysis used a hypothesis test using a t-test with a significant 5% level and degrees of freedom 61. Based on the results of the hypothesis, I test obtained  and . Because , so  is accepted. So, concluded that there is no difference in mathematics learning interaction between students taught using cooperative learning model Think Pair Share (TPS) type with students taught using a direct learning model. Because of the hypothesis, I obtained no difference, and then the hypothesis II test is not needed to continue. So, concluded that the cooperative learning model Think Pair Share (TPS) type is not more effective than the direct learning model.
References
Direktorat Jendral Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. 2010. Pelaksanaan Penilaian dalam Implementasi KTSP Kementrian Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan
Fathurrohman, Muhammad & Sulistyorini. 2012. Belajar Pembelajaran: Meningkatkan Mutu Pembelajaran Sesuai Standar Nasional. Yogyakarta: Teras
Mulyasa, E. 2005. Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi: Konsep, Karakteristik, dan Implementasi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya
Sardiman, A. M. 2016. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar-Mengajar. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with AdMathEduSt: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
