THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TEACHER'S ATTENTION, LEARNING HABITS, AND HOME STUDY FACILITIES WITH MATHEMATICS LEARNING OUTCOMES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/admathedust.v5i2.17265Keywords:
Teacher’s attention, learning habits, home study facilities, mathematics learning outcomes.Abstract
Many factors influence the low mathematics learning outcome. Teachers' attention, learning habits, and home study facilities may affect students' mathematics learning outcomes. Therefore, this research was conducted in order to determine whether there is a positive and significant relationship between teacher's attention, learning habits, and home study facilities with mathematics learning outcomes in even semester of the eight-grade students at SMP Negeri 7 kebumen academic year of 2016/2017. The population in this research were all students of class VIII SMP Negeri 7 kebumen in academic year 2016/2017 consisting of 3 classes with a total of 92 students. Random sampling techniques used to get the class sample and collected VIII H as a sample that consists of 30 students. Data collection techniques were conducted by questionnaires to the teacher's attention, learning habits, and home study facilities. They are a test method for mathematics learning outcomes. Test instruments used validity and reliability. Prerequisite test analysis using normality test, independent, and linearity test. Hypothesis testing data analysis using simple linear regression analysis and multiple regression analysis and correlation. The results showed that there is a positive and significant correlation among teacher’s attention, learning habits and home study facilities with mathematics learning outcomes with Fcount = 11,97 and Ftable = 2,98 so Fcount > Ftable, multiple correlation coefficient (R) is 0,76, and the multiple determination coefficient (R2) is 0,58. While the multiple regression equation is , relatively contribution (X1) = 45,51%, the relative contribution (X2) = 31,19%, the relative contribution (X3) = 23,30% and effective contribution (X1) = 26,40%, the effective contribution (X2) = 18,10%, and the effective contribution (X3) = 13,52%.
References
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2009. Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia. 2003. Undang-undang RI Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Biro Hukum dan Organisasi Sekretariat Jenderal Departemen Pendidikan NasionalArikunto, Suharsimi. 2012. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta : Bumi Askara.
Slameto. 2010. Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Winarni, Sudati. 2014. Pengaruh Perhatian Guru, Motivasi Belajar, dan Kecerdasan Emosional terhadap Prestasi Belajar Biologi Siswa SMA Negeri 2 Bantul. Jurnal BIOEDUKATIKA. UAD
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with AdMathEduSt: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License