COMPARISON OF DYADIC METHOD STRUCTURE AND LITTLE METHOD WITH BRAIN GYM COMBINATION ON THE ACTIVITIES AND LEARNING RESULTS OF CLASS VII STUDENTS OF SMP NEGERI 8 YOGYAKARTA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/admathedust.v4i7.17155Keywords:
Comparison, Dyadic Method Structure, Lecture Method, Brain Gym, Activity, Learning Outcomes.Abstract
The population in this study were eighth-grade students of SMP Negeri 8 Yogyakarta in the 2015/2016 academic year consisting of 5 classes. With the random sampling technique, class VII I was selected as the Structure Dyadic Method experimental class and class VII F as the Brain Gym experimental class. The design in this study uses factorial design. Data collection techniques using questionnaires and test methods. Questionnaire sheets are used to determine the level of student activity, while multiple-choice questions are used to find out the results of learning mathematics. The data collection instrument test uses a validity test and a reliability test. The data analysis technique used is the prerequisite test, normality test, homogeneity test, and hypothesis testing. The results of the experimental class hypothesis test with a significant level of 5% and dk = 62 indicate that: (1) there is a difference inactiveness in learning using the Structure Dyadic Method and lecture method with a combination of Brain Gym shown by  , so that  (2) there are differences in learning outcomes using the Dyadic Method Structure and lecture methods with a combination of Brain Gym shown by , so that   >  (3) Structure Dyadic Method learning is better than learning lecture method with a combination of Brain Gym to the activeness and student learning outcomes, this is indicated by the activeness using the Dyadic Method Structure 2,119216 and , so that  and learning outcomes using the Dyadic Method Structure and , so that .
References
Arifin, Zainal. (2011). Penelitian Pendidikan Metode andParadigma Baru. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya
Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2011). Penilaian andPenelitian Bidang Bimbingan andKonseling. Yogyakarta: Aditya Media
_________________ . (2013a). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
_________________ . (2013b). Dasar- Dasar Evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Ariyani. (2013). Upaya Peningkatan Keaktifan Belajar Matematika Dengan Menggunakan Model Cooperative Learning Tipe Make A Match Siswa Kelas VII C SMP N 15 Yogyakarta Semester II Tahun Pelajaran 2012/2013. Skripsi. Yogyakarta: Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
Dennison, Paul . E., andGail E. Dennison. (2004). Buku Panduan Lengkap Brain Gym Senam Otak. Jakarta: Grasindo
Dimyati, andMudjiono. (2013). Belajar andPembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Dudeja, Ved andV. Madhavi. (2014). Jelajah Matematika SMP Kelas VII. Jakarta: Yudistira
Gunawan, Adi W. (2003). Genius Learning Strategy. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka
Hamalik, Oemar. (2006). Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Hamzah, Ali andMuhlisrarini. (2014). Perencanaan andStrategi Pembelajaran Matematika. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers
Heruman. (2007). Model Pembelajaran Matematika di Sekolah Dasar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya
Huda, Miftakhul. (2015). Cooperative Learning Metode, Teknik, Struktur andModel Penerapan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Karinah. (2010). Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Yang Diawali Dengan Senam Otak (Brain Gym) Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Awal Siswa SMA Se Kabupaten Kotawaringin Timur Tahun Pelajaran 2009/2010. Tesis. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret
Kemendikbud. (2013). Matematika SMP/Mts Kelas VII. Jakarta: Kemendikbud
Muijs, Daniel, andDavid Reynold. (2008). Effective Teaching Teori andAplikasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Muhidin, Sambas Ali. (2007). Analisis Korelasi, Regresi, andJalur dalam Penelitian. Bandung: Pustaka Setia
Nasution. (2010). Kurikulum andPengajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Nata, Abuddin. (2009). Perspektif Islam Tentang Strategi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group
Purwanto. (2011). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Riduwan. (2011). Dasar-Dasar Statistik. Bandung: Alfabeta
Shadiq, Fadjar (2014). Pembelajaran Matematika Cara Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Siswa. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Silberman, Melvin.L. (2003). Active Learning 101 Cara Belajar Siswa yang Aktif. Bandung: Nusa Media
Slameto. (2001). Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Sudjana. (2002). Metode Statistik. Bandung: Tarsito
Sukmadinata, Nana Syaodih. (2011). Landasan Psikologi Proses Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sularyo. Titi.S, andSetyo Handryastuti. (2002). Senam Otak. Sari Pediatri, Vol. 4,No 1, Juni 2002: 36 – 44. http://saripediatri.idai.or.id/pdfile/4-1-8.pdf . ( Diakses pada tanggal 20 Maret 2016, 19.57 wib)
Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Bandung: Alfabeta
Suherman, Erman, dkk. (2003). Strategi pembelajaran Matematika Kontemporer. Bandung: UPI
Sundayana, Rostina. (2015). Statistik Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta
Suparman. (2013). Metodelogi Penelitian Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: MIPA UAD Press
Suryosubtoto. (2009). Proses Belajar Mengajar di Sekolah. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Suyono, andHariyanto. (2014). Belajar andPembelajaran Teori andKonsep. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya
Syah, Muhibin. (2011). Psikologi Pendidikan Dengan Pendekatan Baru. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya
Undang-undang RI No.20 Tahun 2003. Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Uno, Hamzah B. (2011). Belajar dengan Pendekatan PAILKEM. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Wijaya, Ariyadi. (2012). Pendidikan Matematika Realistik; Suatu Alternatif Pendekatan Pembelajaran Matematika. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu
Zaini, Hisyam dkk. (2008). Strategi Pembelajaran Aktif. Yogyakarta: Insan Madani
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with AdMathEduSt: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License