COMPARISON OF DYADIC METHOD STRUCTURE AND LITTLE METHOD WITH BRAIN GYM COMBINATION ON THE ACTIVITIES AND LEARNING RESULTS OF CLASS VII STUDENTS OF SMP NEGERI 8 YOGYAKARTA

Authors

  • Eka Triyani Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/admathedust.v4i7.17155

Keywords:

Comparison, Dyadic Method Structure, Lecture Method, Brain Gym, Activity, Learning Outcomes.

Abstract

The population in this study were eighth-grade students of SMP Negeri 8 Yogyakarta in the 2015/2016 academic year consisting of 5 classes. With the random sampling technique, class VII I was selected as the Structure Dyadic Method experimental class and class VII F as the Brain Gym experimental class. The design in this study uses factorial design. Data collection techniques using questionnaires and test methods. Questionnaire sheets are used to determine the level of student activity, while multiple-choice questions are used to find out the results of learning mathematics. The data collection instrument test uses a validity test and a reliability test. The data analysis technique used is the prerequisite test, normality test, homogeneity test, and hypothesis testing. The results of the experimental class hypothesis test with a significant level of 5% and dk = 62 indicate that: (1) there is a difference inactiveness in learning using the Structure Dyadic Method and lecture method with a combination of Brain Gym shown by   , so that  (2) there are differences in learning outcomes using the Dyadic Method Structure and lecture methods with a combination of Brain Gym shown by , so that    >  (3) Structure Dyadic Method learning is better than learning lecture method with a combination of Brain Gym to the activeness and student learning outcomes, this is indicated by the activeness using the Dyadic Method Structure 2,119216 and , so that  and learning outcomes using the Dyadic Method Structure and , so that .

References

Arifin, Zainal. (2011). Penelitian Pendidikan Metode andParadigma Baru. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya

Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2011). Penilaian andPenelitian Bidang Bimbingan andKonseling. Yogyakarta: Aditya Media

_________________ . (2013a). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

_________________ . (2013b). Dasar- Dasar Evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Ariyani. (2013). Upaya Peningkatan Keaktifan Belajar Matematika Dengan Menggunakan Model Cooperative Learning Tipe Make A Match Siswa Kelas VII C SMP N 15 Yogyakarta Semester II Tahun Pelajaran 2012/2013. Skripsi. Yogyakarta: Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Dennison, Paul . E., andGail E. Dennison. (2004). Buku Panduan Lengkap Brain Gym Senam Otak. Jakarta: Grasindo

Dimyati, andMudjiono. (2013). Belajar andPembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Dudeja, Ved andV. Madhavi. (2014). Jelajah Matematika SMP Kelas VII. Jakarta: Yudistira

Gunawan, Adi W. (2003). Genius Learning Strategy. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka

Hamalik, Oemar. (2006). Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Hamzah, Ali andMuhlisrarini. (2014). Perencanaan andStrategi Pembelajaran Matematika. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers

Heruman. (2007). Model Pembelajaran Matematika di Sekolah Dasar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya

Huda, Miftakhul. (2015). Cooperative Learning Metode, Teknik, Struktur andModel Penerapan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Karinah. (2010). Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Yang Diawali Dengan Senam Otak (Brain Gym) Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Awal Siswa SMA Se Kabupaten Kotawaringin Timur Tahun Pelajaran 2009/2010. Tesis. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret

Kemendikbud. (2013). Matematika SMP/Mts Kelas VII. Jakarta: Kemendikbud

Muijs, Daniel, andDavid Reynold. (2008). Effective Teaching Teori andAplikasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Muhidin, Sambas Ali. (2007). Analisis Korelasi, Regresi, andJalur dalam Penelitian. Bandung: Pustaka Setia

Nasution. (2010). Kurikulum andPengajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Nata, Abuddin. (2009). Perspektif Islam Tentang Strategi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group

Purwanto. (2011). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Riduwan. (2011). Dasar-Dasar Statistik. Bandung: Alfabeta

Shadiq, Fadjar (2014). Pembelajaran Matematika Cara Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Siswa. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Silberman, Melvin.L. (2003). Active Learning 101 Cara Belajar Siswa yang Aktif. Bandung: Nusa Media

Slameto. (2001). Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Sudjana. (2002). Metode Statistik. Bandung: Tarsito

Sukmadinata, Nana Syaodih. (2011). Landasan Psikologi Proses Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sularyo. Titi.S, andSetyo Handryastuti. (2002). Senam Otak. Sari Pediatri, Vol. 4,No 1, Juni 2002: 36 – 44. http://saripediatri.idai.or.id/pdfile/4-1-8.pdf . ( Diakses pada tanggal 20 Maret 2016, 19.57 wib)

Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Bandung: Alfabeta

Suherman, Erman, dkk. (2003). Strategi pembelajaran Matematika Kontemporer. Bandung: UPI

Sundayana, Rostina. (2015). Statistik Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta

Suparman. (2013). Metodelogi Penelitian Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: MIPA UAD Press

Suryosubtoto. (2009). Proses Belajar Mengajar di Sekolah. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Suyono, andHariyanto. (2014). Belajar andPembelajaran Teori andKonsep. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya

Syah, Muhibin. (2011). Psikologi Pendidikan Dengan Pendekatan Baru. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya

Undang-undang RI No.20 Tahun 2003. Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Uno, Hamzah B. (2011). Belajar dengan Pendekatan PAILKEM. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Wijaya, Ariyadi. (2012). Pendidikan Matematika Realistik; Suatu Alternatif Pendekatan Pembelajaran Matematika. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu

Zaini, Hisyam dkk. (2008). Strategi Pembelajaran Aktif. Yogyakarta: Insan Madani

Downloads

Published

2017-07-31

Issue

Section

Articles