EFFECTIVENESS MODEL OF LEARNING CYCLE “5Eâ€AND STUDENT TEAM ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION (STAD) ON MATHEMATICS LEARNING OUTCOMES IN GRADE VIII OF EVEN SEMESTER IN SMP NEGERI 1 SEDAYU
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/admathedust.v4i2.14264Keywords:
Effectiveness, Model of learning cycle “5Eâ€, Model of learning STAD, Model of learning conventional, Learning results.Abstract
ABSTRACT
The reason for the research that the learning process uses in SMP Negeri 1 Sedayu tends teacher-centered,  students becoming passive and less involved in the learning process, and needed the model of learning that involved students. The objective of the study is to know the effectiveness model of the learning cycle “5E†and STAD to student's mathematics learning outcomes. The population in this study were all students in grade VIII even semester SMP Negeri 1 Sedayu academic year 2015/2016. Technique sampling using a random sample of the class, obtainable class VIII A as experiment class I, class VIII E as experiment class II, and class VIII C as control class. The data collection technique is to use the test. The research instrument is the mathematics result test in the form of a double helix. Instrument test includes validity, distinguishing capacity ad reliability testing. Analysis of the data used is the prerequisite test analysis consist of a normality test and homogeneity test, and the hypothesis test consists of test F and tests Least significant different (LSD). The result on a significant level 5% and df = (2,87) shows (1) there is a different result of the mathematics learning uses the model of learning cycle “5Eâ€, the model of learning STAD, and model of learning conventionally. This is shows with value fcount = 12,1253 > ftable  >  and (2) the results mathematics learning of the students that use the model of learning cycle “5E†better than learning process uses the model of learning STAD and result from mathematics learning of the students that use the model of learning STAD better than learning process uses the model of learning conventionally. This result shows with hypothesis test LSD which is significant level 5% and 87 degrees of freedom is obtained in case I because   rejected, it's mean that  . In case II   rejected, it is mean that . While in case III   rejected, it's mean that . While can concludes as follow .
References
Rusman. 2013. Model-model Pembelajaran: Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru (Edisi Kedua). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Slavin, Robert E. 2005. Cooperative Learning: Teori, Riset dan Praktik. Bandung: Nusa Media.
.2015. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantiatif, dan R&D). Bandung : Alfabeta
Wena, Made. 2011. Strategi Pembelajaran. Inovatif Kontemporer: Suatu Tinjauan Konseptual Operasional. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with AdMathEduSt: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
