Teachers’ Misconception about National Assessment and National Examination

Authors

  • Kisno Kisno Sekolah Tinggi Akuntansi dan Manajemen Indonesia (STAMI) http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3854-1529
  • Umi Rokhyati Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
  • Fenty Nur Fatimah Sekolah Tinggi Akuntansi dan Manajemen Indonesia (STAMI)
  • Rita M Siregar Universitas HKBP Nommensen Pematangsiantar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26555/adjes.v8i1.20081

Keywords:

Teachers’ Misconception, National Assessment, National Examination

Abstract

National Assessment is administered as the new policy from The Ministry of Education and Culture of Indonesia. It will be administered from September to October 2021. Therefore, teachers are urged to master the concept and the format of national assessment so as to implement it in the learning process. The teachers’ proper understanding on those concept and formats supports the success of national assessment. Despite this fact, most of the teachers were fulfilled with anxiety of the transition from national examination to national assessment. This research attempted to reveal the junior high school teachers’ misconception about National assessment and national examination. A 30-online-multiple-choice test was administered to 50 in-service teachers from both the state and the private junior high schools. The data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. The findings revealed that both the state and the private junior high schools’ teachers experienced three misconceptions about national assessment. Majority of the teachers’ misconception was about the technical administration of national assessment (76%) and the others were about the basic concept of national assessment (65%), and the follow up to result of national assessment (61%). These results suggest the reinforcement and empowerment of the schools concerning the socialization and the prototype or simulation implementation of national assessment. 

Author Biographies

Kisno Kisno, Sekolah Tinggi Akuntansi dan Manajemen Indonesia (STAMI)

Management Study Program

Umi Rokhyati, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

FKIP English Education Study Program

Fenty Nur Fatimah, Sekolah Tinggi Akuntansi dan Manajemen Indonesia (STAMI)

Management Study Program

Rita M Siregar, Universitas HKBP Nommensen Pematangsiantar

FKIP English Education Study Program

References

Akib, E., Imran, M. E., Mahtari, S., Mahmud, M. R., Prawiyogy, A. G., Supriatna, I., & Ikhsan, M. H. (2020, April). Study on Implementation of Integrated Curriculum in Indonesia. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Education, 1(1), 39-57. doi:https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v1i1.24

Alawiyah, F. (2015). Perubahan Kebijakan Ujian Nasional (Studi Pelaksanaan Ujian Nasional 2015). Aspirasi: Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Sosial, 6(2), 189-202. doi:https://doi.org/10.46807/aspirasi.v6i2.513

Asrianto, A., Rohmayadevi, L., & Rokhyati, U. (2020, March). Teacher’s Strategies in Managing the Class. Eduvelop: Journal of English Education and Development, 3(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.31605/eduvelop.v3i2.602

Bordens, K. S., & Abbott, B. B. (2018). Research Design and Methods: A Process Approach, Tenth Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

Comas-Lopez, M., Rubia, M. A., & Sacha, G. M. (2018). Adaptive test system for subjects that simultaneously include theoretical content and numerical problem solving. 2018 International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE) (hal. 1-5). Jerez: IEEE Explore. doi:10.1109/SIIE.2018.8586729

Effendi, T., & Suyudi, I. (2017). The Impacts of English National Examination in Indonesia. Ninth International Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 9. 82, hal. 236-239. Atlantis Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.2991/conaplin-16.2017.52

Hadi, A., & Arwan. (2011). Pro Kontra Ujian Nasional (UN) dalam Sistem Evaluasi Pendidikan di Indonesia. Conciencia: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 79-92.

Hartanto, S. (2013). Ujian Nasional (UN), Masih Perlukah? Jakarta: LPPKS.

Hidayati, A., Zaim, M., Rukun, K., & Darmansyah. (2014, June). The development of character education curriculum for elementary students in West Sumatera. International Journal or Education and Research, 2(6), 189-198.

Iramdan, & Manurung, L. (2019, April). Sejarah Kurikulum di Indonesia . Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan , 5(2), 88-95. Diambil kembali dari https://jurnal.unibrah.ac.id/index.php/JIWP/article/view/98

Ismail, H. F. (2015, September). Pro Kontra Ujian Nasional. Al-Riwayah: Jurnal Kependidikan, 7(2), 301-324. Diambil kembali dari http://ejournal.stain.sorong.ac.id/indeks.php/al-riwayah

Kemdikbud. (2020). Lembar Tanya Jawab Asesmen Nasional. Jakarta.

Koesoema, D. (2020). Kebijakan Ujian Nasional dan Asesmen Nasional. Jakarta.

Kompas. (2020, September 15). Perjalanan Ujian Nasional dari Masa ke Masa. Diambil kembali dari Kompas.com: https://www.kompas.com/edu/read/2020/09/15/110837871/perjalanan-ujian-nasional-dari-masa-ke-masa-kamu-ikut-yang-mana?page=all

Kusuma, M. D., Rosidin, U., Abdurrahman, & Suyatna, A. (2017). The Development of Higher Order Thinking Skill (Hots) Instrument Assessment In Physics Study . IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME) , 7(1), 1-7. doi:DOI: 10.9790/7388-070103XXXX

Munthe, N. B. (2020). Opini Siswa Tentang Rencana Penghapusan Ujian Nasional Pada Tahun 2021 (Studi Kasus Pada SMA NEGERI 2 MEDAN) . Medan: Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara.

Nehru, N. A. (2020). Asesmen Kompetensi Sebagai Bentuk Perubahan Ujian Nasional Pendidikan Indonesia: Analisis Dampak Dan Problem-Solving Menurut Kebijakan Merdeka Belajar. Diambil kembali dari https://www.academia.edu/download/62372209/ASESMEN_KOMPETENSI_SEBAGAI_BENTUK_PERUBAHAN_UJIAN_NASIONAL_PENDIDIKAN_INDONESIA20200315-94955-1h4ufc5.pdf

Ningsih, A. W., Shara, A. M., Andriani, D., & Kisno. (2021, February 6). Reading Duration and Financial Literacy in Vocational High School. Jurnal Education and Development, 9(1), 577-583. doi:https://doi.org/10.37081/ed.v9i1.2288

Novita, N., Mellyzar, & Herizal. (2021). Asesmen Nasional (AN): Pengetahuan dan Persepsi Calon Guru. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan , 5(1), 172-179.

Pernamawati, S., Kritiawan, M., & Fitria, H. (2021, January). Analisis SWOT Ujian Nasional Berbasis Komputer. JMKSP: Jurnal Manajemen, Kepemimpinan, dan Supervisi Pendidikan, 6(1), 112-123.

Ritonga, M. (2018). Politik dan Dinamika Kebijakan Perubahan Kurikulum Pendidikan di Indonesia hingga Masa Reformasi. Bina Gogik, 5(2), 88-102.

Romios, L., Kristianingrum, N. P., & Saragih, N. A. (2020, October). Educational Policy: Voices from Local English Teachers and Students towards National Exam in Yogyakarta. Metathesis: Journal of English Language Literature and Teaching, 4(2), 217-231. doi:DOI: 10.31002/metathesis.v4.i2.2801

Shara, A. M., Andriani, D., Ningsih, A. W., & Kisno. (2020, December). Correlating Reading Literacy and Writing Literacy in Junior High School Pematangsiantar. Journal of English Education (JEE), 5(2), 72-85. doi:https://doi.org/10.31327/jee.v5i2.1249

Sutari, V. R. (2017). National Examination in Indonesia and Its Backwash Effects: Teachers' Perspectives. Ninth International Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 9). 82, hal. 331-333. Atlantis Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.2991/conaplin-16.2017.76

Unicef. (2020). Education and Covid-19. New York: Unicef Data.

Weafer, D., & Costin, M. (2017, July 10). Competency-Based Education. Portland, Maryland.

Widana, I. W. (2017). Modul Penyusunan Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS). Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Widyatmoko, A., & Shimizu, K. (2018). An overview of conceptual understanding in science education curriculum in Indonesia. International Conference on Mathematics, Science and Education 2017 (ICMSE2017). 983, hal. 1-6. Semarang: IOP Publishing Ltd.

Yuliati, S. R., & Lestari, I. (2018). Higher-Order Thinking Skills (Hots) Analysis of Students in Solving HOTS Question in Higher Education. PERSPEKTIF Ilmu Pendidikan , 32(2), 181-188. doi: https://doi.org/10.21009/PIP.322.10

Downloads

Published

2021-04-13

Issue

Section

Articles