The Role of Psychological Capital on Employee Voice: Conservation Resources Framework
Abstract
The current study aims to explain how psychological capital influences employee voice in the Indonesian context. The conservation resources framework can provide an explanation of how personal resources, namely psychological capital (psycap) have an impact on work behavior (employee voice). This study involved 182 participants from various companies. Questionnaires were circulated via an instant messaging application, several social media platforms, and paper-based. Based on a simple regression analysis, it is proven that psychological capital is significantly related to employee voice. Employees can choose to speak up when they are motivated by a pro-social motive that brings to constructive changes to themselves and the organizations. Psycap interacting simultaneously produces different manifestations, which can make individuals obtain new resources. By acquiring these additional resources, individuals are ready to meet the demands of work and achieve their work goals, by providing a voice.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bai, Y., Lin, L., & Liu, J. T. (2017). Leveraging the employee voice: a multi-level social learning perspective of ethical leadership. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 5192, 1–33. DOI. 10.1080/09585192.2017.1308414
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 1, 185-216. DOI. 10.1177/135910457000100301.
Budd, J., Gollan, P. J. & Wilkinson, A. (2010). New approaches to employee voice and participation in organizations. Human Relations, 1-14, DOI. 10.1117/0018726709348938.
Botero, I. C. (2013). Individual correlates employee voice: What do we know so far? Where should we go next?. In Voice and Whistleblowing in Organizations: Overcoming Fear, Fostering Courage and Unleasing Candor, 2nd ed.; Burke, R.J., Cooper, C.L., Eds.; Publisher: Northmanton, MA, USA, pp. 75-89, ISBN.9781781005910.
Chamberlin, M., Newton, D. W. & Lepine, J. A. (2017). A Meta-Analysis of Voice and Its Promotive and Prohibitive Forms: Identification of Key Associations, Distinctions, and Future Research Directions. Personnel Psychology, 70(1), 11–71. DOI. 10.1111/peps.12185
Constantin, E. C., & Baias, C. C. (2015). Employee voice-key factor in internal communication. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 975-978. DOI. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.319.
Detert, J.R.; Burris, E.R. & Harrison, D.A. (2010). Debunking four myths about employee silence. Havard Business Review, 88(6), 26-39.
Duan, J., Kwan, H. K. & Ling, B. (2014). The role of voice efficacy in the formation of voice behaviour: A cross-level examination. Journal of Management and Organization, 20(4), 526–543. DOI. 10.1017/jmo.2014.40
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E.; Lang, A-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191
Glew, D.J., O’Leary-Kelly, A.M., Griffin, R.W., & Van Fleet, D.D. (1995). Participation in organizations: A preview of the issues and proposed framework for future analysis. Journal of Management, 21, 395-421, DOI. 10.1177/014920639502100302.
Hatipoglu, C., & Inelmen, K. (2017). Demographic diversity in the workplace and its impact on employee voice: the role of trust in the employeer. Journal of Human Resource Management, 2-25. DOI. 10.1080/09585192.2017.1322120.
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513.
Humborstad, S. I. & Dysvik, A. (2016). Organizational tenure and mastery-avoidance goals: The moderating role of psychological empowerment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27, 1237–1251.
Irawanto, D.W. (2011). Exploring paternalistic leadership and its application to the Indonesian context. Database Proquest Dissertations & Theses. Massey University, Palmersion North New Zealand.
Jamovi Project. Jamovi (Version, 0.9) [computer software]. Retreived from https://www.jamovi.org.
Lakens, D. (2014). Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses: Sequential analyses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 701-710. DOI. 10.1002/ejsp.2023
Liang, J., Farh, C. I. & Farh, J. L. (2012). Psychological Antecedents of Promotive and Prohibitive Voice : a Two-Wave Examination, Academy of Management Journal,55(1), 71–92. DOI. 10.5465/amj.2010.0176
Liu, W., Zhu, R. & Yang, Y. (2010).I warn your because I like you: Voice behavior, employee identifications, and transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 189-202. DOI. bx7rxq
Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M. & Avolio, B.J. (2007).Psychological Capital: Developing the human competitive edge.; Publisher: Oxford University Press, New York.
Luthans, F., Morgan, C. M. & Avolio, B. J. (2015).Psychological capital and beyond. Publisher: Oxford University Press, New York.
Milliken, F. J., Morrison, E.W. & Hewlin, P. F. (2003). An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don’t communicate upward and why. Journal of Management Studies, 40,1453–1476. DOI. 10.1111/1467-6486.00387
Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 373–412. DOI. 10.1080/19416520.2011.574506
Morrison, E. W. (2014). Employee Voice and Silence. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 173–197. DOI. 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091328
Morrison, E. W. & Milliken, F. J. (2000). A barrier organizational silence: to change and development in a pluralistic world, Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 706–725.
Newman, A., Ucbasaran, D., Zhu, F. & Hirst, G. (2014). Psychological capital: A review and synthesis. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 35, 120-138. DOI. 10.1002/job.1916.
Ng, T. W. H. & Feldman, D. C. (2012). Employee voice behavior: a meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 216–234. DOI. 10.1002/job.754
Prihatsanti, U., Handoyo, S. H., & Ardi, R. (2018).Employee’s voice behavior: A Literature review and conceptual development. Proceedings The 6th ASEAN Regional Union Psychological Society (ARUPS) Congress.
Prihatsanti, U., Handoyo, S.H. & Ardi, R. (inpress).I am sure I can speak up: The role of efficacy on employee voice. Proceedings International Conference on Psychology.
Seligman, M.E.P. (2011). Learned optimism. Retreived from https://books.google.com/books?isbn=0307803341
Sirota, D., & Klein, D. A. (2014). The Enthusiastic Employee: How Companies Profit by Giving Workers What They Want, 2nd ed.; Publisher: Pearson Education Inc, New Jersey, ISBN. 1978-0-13-324902-6
Tangirala, S., & Ramanujam, R. (2008). Employee silence on critical work issues: The cross-level effects of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology, 61, 37-68.
Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108-119. DOI. 10.2307/256902.
Wang, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2018). How transformational leadership influences employee voice behavior: The roles of psychological capital and organizational identification. Social Behavior and Personality, 46(2), 313-322. DOI. 10.2224/sbp.6619.
Wang, Y., & Yuan, C. (2017). Coaching leadership and employee voice behavior: A multilevel study. Social Behavior and Personality, 45(10), 1655-1664. DOI. 10.2224/sbp.6593.
Zare, M., & Flinchbaugh, C. (2018). Voice, creativity, and bid five personality traits: A Meta-Analysis. Human Performance, 2-22. DOI. 10.1080/08959285.2018.1550782.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12928/jehcp.v9i2.16169
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.