Immunity Rights Problems before the ICC: Between the 1961 Vienna Convention and the 1998 Rome Statute
Abstract
Introduction to The Problem: The right to immunity in international law is a privilege granted to Diplomatic Officers in the context of carrying out missions, in particular, representing the state. The immunity rights of a Diplomatic Officer must be protected and respected by the recipient state as an obligation in diplomatic relations. The rights of immunity respected in customary international law under the 1961 Vienna Convention are inversely proportional to those stipulated in the 1998 Rome Statute regarding the abolition of immunity rights before the International Criminal Court. This thing then raises the status of immunity rights problems between the 1961 Vienna Convention and the 1998 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.
Purpose/Objective Study: This study aims to examine the problematics of applying immunity rights for diplomatic officials, namely how the respect and protection of immunity rights regulated in the 1961 Vienna Convention and how the abolition of immunity rights held in the 1998 Rome Statute of ICC. This thing then looks for problems in immunity rights between the two conventions in practice and occurred-cases.
Design/Methodology/Approach: This study used a normative research method. The assessment is carried out using a conceptual approach, a statute approach, and a case approach so that the relevance between the problem and the final purpose of this research is found.
Findings: This study found several reasons regarding the status of immunity rights before the International Criminal Court, which raises the problem of weaknesses in international law related to immunity rights. The flaw was triggered due to the lack of legal certainty associated with the lack of hierarchy used in the provisions of international law. So that between the 1998 Rome Statute of ICC and the 1961 Vienna Convention, there was a dilemma in its application. Based on the case, the UN Security Council, as an international institution, influences the decision on how the status of the right to immunity can be applied or not.
Paper Type: Research ArticleKeywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bahri, S., & Hafidz, J. (2017). Penerapan Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda Pada Testament Yang Dibuat di Hadapan Notaris. Jurnal Akta, 4(2), 152-157. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.4.2.152%20-%20157
Banteka, N. (2016). Mind the Gap : A Systematic Approach to the International Criminal Court’s Arrest Warrants Enforcement Problem. Cornell International Law Journal, 49(3), 521-563. Retrieved from https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cilj/vol49/iss3/2/
Cakmak, C. (2006). The International Criminal Court in World Politics. International Journal on World Peace, 23(1), 3-40. Retrieved from https://s.uad.id/YEtle
Christmas, S. K., & Setiyono, J. (2019). Intervensi Militer Terhadap Kudeta Politik Menurut Prinsip Jus Cogens. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 1(3), 308-321. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v1i3.308-321
Dixon, M. (2000). Textbook on International Law : Fourth Edition. London: Blackstone Press Limited.
International Criminal Court. (2019a). Situation in Darfur, Sudan (ICC-02/05). Retrieved November 6, 2019, from International Criminal Court website: https://www.icc-cpi.int/darfur
International Criminal Court. (2019b). Understanding the International Criminal Court. The Hague: Public Information and Documentation Section.
Jalloh, C. C. (2012). Africa and the International Criminal Court : Collision Course or Cooperation ? North Carolina Central Law Review, 34(203), 203-229. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2325520
Karauwan, G. M. (2017). Kajian Terhadap Penyalahgunaan Hak Imunitas Seorang Diplomat Menurut Konvensi Wina 1961. Lex Privatum, 5(5), 5-12. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/17032
Kusumaatmadja, M. (1982). Pengantar Hukum Internasional : Cetakan Keempat. Jakarta: Bina Cipta.
Philipp, C. E. (2003). The International Criminal Court - A Brief Introduction. Journal of Max Planck Institute for European Legal History, 7, 331-339. https://doi.org/10.1163/138946303775160331
Prakash, K. P. (2002). International Criminal Court : A Review. Economic and Political Weekly, 37(40), 4113-4115. Retrieved from https://s.uad.id/GjAQM
Purwanto, H. (2009). Keberadaan Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda Dalam Perjanjian Internasional. Mimbar Hukum, 21(1), 155-170. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16252
Regina, S. H. M. (2016). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Hak Kekebalan Dan Keistimewaan Perwakilan Diplomatik Dari Organisasi Internasional Berdasarkan Hukum Internasional. Lex Privatum, 4(2), 64-72.
Scharf, M. P. (2001). The ICC’s Jurisdiction Over the Nationals of Non-Party State : A Critique of the U.S. Position. Law and Contemporary Problems, 64(1), 67-117. Retrieved from https://s.uad.id/qrKnL
Sefriani. (2010). Imunitas Negara Asing Di Depan Pengadilan Nasional Dalam Kasus Pelanggaran HAM Yang Berat Konsekuensi Hukum Jus Cogens terhadap Imunitas Negara. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 17(1), 21-40. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol17.iss1.art2
Sekartadji, K. (2004). Prospek Dan Tantangan International Criminal Court. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan, 34(2), 91-109. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol34.no2.1431
Song, S.-H. (2012). The Role of the International Criminal Court in Ending Impunity and Establishing the Rule of Law. Retrieved from United Nations Chronicle website: https://www.un.org/en/chronicle/article/role-international-criminal-court-ending-impunity-and-establishing-rule-law
Starke, J. G. (2012). Pengantar Hukum Internasional. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Suherman, A. M. (2003). Organisasi Internasional & Integrasi Ekonomi Regional Dalam Perspektif Hukum & Globalisasi. Jakarta: PT. Ghalia Indonesia.
Wulan, A. R. (2017). Pelaksanaan Kekebalan Diplomatik Dalam Konvensi Wina 1961 Perspektif Siyasah Dauliyah. Adliya Jurnal Hukum Dan Kemanusiaan, 11(2), 191-121. https://doi.org/10.15575/adliya.v11i2.4859
Yogy, Y., & Kurnia, I. (2018). Tanggung Jawab Negara terhadap Perlindungan Pejabat Dipolmatik Menurut Konvensi Wina 1961 (Contoh Kasus Penyerangan Duta Besar Rusia Di Turki). Jurnal Hukum Adigama, 1(1), 1-25.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v11i2.a16284
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Hukum Novelty
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Hukum Novelty
ISSN 1412-6834 (Print)
ISSN 2550-0090 (Online)
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Hukum Novelty has been covered by the following indexing sites:
Jurnal Hukum Novelty is member of:
