Patent Legal Protection On Invention (Comparation Study Between Indonesia and Japan)

Salsabila Khairunnisa

Abstract


The development of technology is needed and cannot be separated from patent protection between WIPO’s (World Intellectual Property Organization) member like Indonesia and Japan. This study discusses Indonesian patent protection law and its comparison toward invention between Indonesia and Japan. The study done through normative research methodology and analysed it comparatively. Indonesia has regulated the patent protection in Act Number 13 of 2016. The scopes are patent, simple patent, and also the period of patent protection for 20 years, while regular patent protected for only 10 years. Japan has arranged the patent protection in Japan Patent Act 21/1959 and it covers the patent and utility model. The time period for the patent protection is 20 years and for utility models is 6 years. The two countries have used common principle that is ‘first to file’. Both nations have also required the same requirements which are the novelty of the invention, the beneficial of the product, and the invention steps. Litigation and non-litigation are the doors to resolve patent dispute.


Keywords


Legal Protection; Patent; Invention; First to File

Full Text:

PDF

References


Cohen, M. S. (1994). Japanese Patent Law and the WIPO Patent Law Harmonization Treaty: A Comparative Analysis. Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal, 4(3), 847–890.

Darusman, Y. M. (2016). Kedudukan Serta Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Hak Paten dalam Kerangka Hukum Nasional Indonesia dan Hukum Internasional. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 5(1), 203–215.

Djumhana, M., & Djubaedillah, R. (2008). Hak Milik Intelektual Sejarah: Teori dan Praktiknya di Indonesia. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Gumanti, R. (2015). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Paten di Indonesia. Al-Mizan, 11(1), 196–210.

Hill, D. W., & Murata, S. (2007). Patent Litigation in Japan. Akron Intellectual Property Journal, (109), 141–184.

Ibrahim, J. (2006). Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Banyumedia Publishing.

Maskus, K. E., & McDaniel, C. (1999). Impacts of the Japanese patent system on productivity growth. Japan and the World Economy, 11(4), 557–574.

Maulana, I. B. (1999). Perlindungan Merek Terkenal Di Indonesia Dari Masa Ke Masa. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Munandar, H., & Sitanggang, S. (2011). Mengenal HAKI Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Hak Cipta, Paten, Merek dan Seluk Beluknya. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Murjiyanto, R. (2017). Konsep Kepemilikan Hak Atas Merek di Indonesia (Studi Pergeseran Sistem “Deklaratif” ke dalam Sistem “Konstitutif”). Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM NO, 24(1), 52–72.

Purwaningsih, E. (2005). Seri Perkembangan Hukum Intelectual Property Rights. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Purwaningsih, E. (2015). Seri Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Hukum Paten. Bandung: CV.Mandar Maju.

Saidin, H. O. (2013). Aspek Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (Intelectual Property Rights). Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Sakakibara, M., & Branstetter, L. (2001). Do Stronger Patents Induce More Innovation? Evidence from the 1988 Japanese Patent Law Reforms. The RAND Journal of Economics, 32(1), 77–100.

Sutedi, A. (2013). Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Utomo, T. S. (2010). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI) di Era Global. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v9i2.a11338

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 65 times
PDF - 35 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Hukum Novelty

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Hukum Novelty

ISSN 1412-6834 (Print)

ISSN 2550-0090 (Online)

Creative Commons License
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Jurnal Hukum Novelty Stats

 

Jurnal Hukum Novelty is indexed by:

 

   

 

Jurnal Hukum Novelty is member of: