Christiany Suwartono, Clara Moningka


Social identity is an essential part of individual’s self-concept in the context of a particular group of his/her social environment. The social environment in this study referred to Indonesian as a nation. The authors adapted the Collective Self-Esteem Scale (CSE) from Luhtanen and Crocker to identify social identity; to detect to the extent that individual recognizes themselves as Indonesian as a nation. In this research, the scale is called as Social Identity Scale. A total of 298 participants of this study were Jakarta residents with a minimum education of High School or equivalent. For validation purpose, the analysis used Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), using measurement model. The reliability testing used Cronbach's alpha and Omega coefficients. The results of this study indicate the Social Identity Scale in the context of Indonesian has four factors as CSE scale (Luhtanen & Crocker, 1992) and reliable.



Identitas sosial merupakan bagian penting dari konsep diri individu sebagai bagian dari kelompok tertentu dalam lingkungan sosialnya. Lingkungan sosial yang dimaksud pada penelitian ini adalah bangsa Indonesia. Peneliti melakukan adaptasi skala Collective Self-Esteem (CSE) dari Luhtanen dan Crocker yang dapat mengidentifikasikan identitas sosial yaitu sejauh mana individu mengidentifikasikan dirinya sebagai bagian dari bangsa Indonesia. Dalam penelitian ini, skala tersebut kemudian diberi judul Skala Identitas Sosial. Partisipan penelitian ini adalah penduduk Jakarta berjumlah 298 orang dengan pendidikan minimal Sekolah Menengah Atas atau sederajat. Pengujian validitas konstruk dilakukan dengan teknik Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), khususnya dengan measurement model. Pengujian reliabilitas dilakukan melalui koefisien Cronbach’s alpha dan koefisien Omega. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan skala Identitas Sosial dalam konteks bangsa Indonesia ini memiliki empat faktor sesuai dengan skala CSE dan reliabel. 


factor analysis, Indonesia, reliability, social identity, validity

Full Text:



Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–332.

Anastasi, A & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing. (7th Ed). Indiana: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Branscombe, N. R., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content

of social identity threat. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content. Oxford: Blackwell.

Cooley, C.H. (1956). Human nature and the social order. New York: Free Press.

Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (2008). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Ohio, USA: Cengage Learning.

Hu, L.T., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.

Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2013). Psychological testing: Principles, applications, and issues. (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.

Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one's social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302-318.

Lilli, W. & Diehl, M. (1999). Measuring National Identity. Working Paper, Nr. 10, Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung. Diunduh online 9 Februari 2017 pada

Mavric, B. (2014). Psycho-social conception of National Identity and Collective Self-Esteem. Epiphany, 7(1), 184 – 200.

Murphy, K. R., & Davidshover, C. O. (2001). Psychological Testing: Principles and Applications. (5th Ed). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling Procedures: Issues and Applications. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

Peters, G. J. Y. (2014). The alpha and the omega of scale reliability and validity: Why and how to abandon Cronbach’s alpha and the route towards more comprehensive assessment of scale quality. The European Health Psychologist, 16, 56–69.

Petta, G., & Walker, I. (1992). Relative deprivation and ethnic identity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31(4), 285-293. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1992.tb00973.x

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.

Tajfel, H. (1981) Human groups and social categories: studies in social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior Dalam W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.

Tougas, F., & Beaton, A.M. (2002). Personal and group deprivasi relatif: Connecting the “I” to the “We”. Dalam I. Walker dan H.J Smith (Ed), Deprivasi relatif: specification, development and integration (119-135). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Trepte, S. (2006). Social identity theory. Dalam J. Bryant & P. Vorderer (Eds). Psychology of Entertainment. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Weinreich, P. (1986). The operationalization of identity theory in racial and ethnic relations. Dalam J. Rex & D. Mason (Eds), Theories of race and ethnic relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 HUMANITAS: Indonesian Psychological Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

HUMANITAS: Indonesian Psychological Journal
ISSN 1693-7236 (print), 2598-6368 (online)
Email :

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

statistics View My Stats