Dating violence perpetration: Masculine ideology and masculine gender role stress as predictors

Hana Berliani Adiningsih, Cantyo Atindriyo Dannisworo, Mellia Christia

Abstract


Dating violence is one of intimate partner violence cases in Indonesia. Thus far, the motives of dating violence perpetration by a male partner to their intimate partner have not been established. This study aimed to identify the role of masculine ideology and masculine gender role stress as predictors of dating violence. This study collected data from three hundred and ten male college students aged 18-25 who have been involved in a romantic relationship for at least a year. The respondents were assessed with several measurement tools: Masculine Role Norm Inventory-Short Form (MRNI-SF), Masculine Gender Role Stress-Abbreviated (MGRS-A), and the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2). Data collected in this study was then analyzed using multiple regression analysis techniques. The findings show that masculine ideology significantly predicted dating violence, while masculine gender role stress did not predict dating violence. The present research adds to the understanding of the association between masculinity as a cognitive system and gender-related experience of distress to dating violence. Furthermore, masculine ideology can be useful to identify men who are likely to perpetrate dating violence towards their female partners.


Keywords


dating violence; male college students; masculine gender role stress; masculine ideology

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aryani, I. A. (2013). Hubungan antara kekerasan dalam pacaran dan self-esteem pada mahasiswa laki-laki (The relationship of dating violence and self-esteem among male undergraduate students) (Master Thesis). Universitas Indonesia, Depok.

Baron, R. A., & Branscombe, N. R. (2012). Social psychology (13th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

Berke, D. S., Reidy, D. E., Gentile, B., & Zeichner, A. (2016). Masculine discrepancy stress, emotion-regulation difficulties, and intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(6), 1163–1182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516650967

Berke, D. S., & Zeichner, A. (2016). Man’s heaviest burden: A review of contemporary paradigms and new directions for understanding and preventing masculine aggression. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(2), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12238

Birkley, E. L., & Eckhardt, C. I. (2015). Anger, hostility, internalizing negative emotions, and intimate partner violence perpetration: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 37, 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.01.002

Casey, E. A., Masters, N. T., Beadnell, B., Wells, E. A., Morrison, D. M., & Hoppe, M. J. (2016). A latent class analysis of heterosexual young men’s masculinities. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(5), 1039–1050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0616-z

Chan, K. L. (2011). Gender differences in self-reports of intimate partner violence: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2011.02.008

Connolly, J., Nguyen, H. N. T., Pepler, D., Craig, W., & Jiang, D. (2013). Developmental trajectories of romantic stages and associations with problem behaviours during adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 36(6), 1013–1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.08.006

Copenhaver, M. M., Lash, S. J., & Eisler, R. M. (2000). Masculine gender-role stress, anger, and male intimate abusiveness: Implications for men’s relationships. Sex Roles, 42(5–6), 405–414. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007050305387

Dannisworo, C. A., Adiningsih, H. B., & Christia, M. (2019). The moderating role of trait anger in the relationship between masculine stress and intimate partner violence. Psychological Research on Urban Society, 2(2), 106–117. https://doi.org/10.7454/proust.v2i2.71

Gallagher, K. E., & Parrott, D. J. (2011). What accounts for men’s hostile attitudes toward women? The influence of hegemonic male role norms and masculine gender role stress. Violence Against Women, 17(5), 568–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801211407296

Hopkins, S. (2018). Intimate partner violence: Gendered discourses within a human context. Canadian Journal of Family and Youth / Le Journal Canadien de Famille et de La Jeunesse, 10(1), 141–169. https://doi.org/10.29173/cjfy29346

Kahn, J. S., Holmes, J. R., & Brett, B. L. (2011). Dialogical masculinities: Diverse youth resisting dominant masculinity. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 24(1), 30–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720537.2011.530486

Karakurt, G., Keiley, M., & Posada, G. (2013). Intimate relationship aggression in college couples: Family-of-origin violence, egalitarian attitude, attachment security. Journal of Family Violence, 28(6), 561–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-013-9526-9

Kaufman, M. (1987). Beyond patriarchy essays by men on pleasure, power, and change. In Gender & Society (pp. 1–16). Toronto: Oxford University Press.

Kaukinen, C. (2014). Dating violence among college students: The risk and protective factors. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 15(4), 283–296. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1177/1524838014521321

Knowledge Networks. (2011). 2011 College dating violence and abuse poll. Retrieved from https://www.loveisrespect.org/pdf/College_Dating_And_Abuse_Final_Study.pdf

Komnas Perempuan. (2017). Labirin Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan: Dari Gang Rape hingga Femicide, Alarm bagi Negara untuk Bertindak Tepat (Labyrinth of violence against women: From Rape gang to femicide, alarm for country to act rightly). In Lembar Fakta Catatan Tahunan (CATAHU) Komnas Perempuan Tahun 2017 (Annual notes fact sheet Komnas Perempuan 2017). Retrieved from https://www.komnasperempuan.go.id/file/pdf_file/2017 Siaran Pers/Lembar Fakta Catahu 2017.pdf

Lelaurain, S., Fonte, D., Giger, J. C., Guignard, S., & Lo Monaco, G. (2018). Legitimizing intimate partner violence: The role of romantic love and the mediating effect of patriarchal ideologies. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518818427

Levant, R. F. (2011). Research in the psychology of men and masculinity using the gender role strain paradigm as a framework. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 66(8), 765–776. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025034

Levant, Ronald F., Hall, R. J., & Rankin, T. J. (2013). Male role norms inventory-short form (mrni-sf): Development, confirmatory factor analytic investigation of structure, and measurement invariance across gender. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(2), 228–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031545

Lisco, C. G., Leone, R. M., Gallagher, K. E., & Parrott, D. J. (2015). “Demonstrating masculinity” via intimate partner aggression: The moderating effect of heavy episodic drinking. Sex Roles, 73(1–2), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0500-2

Mcdermott, R., Naylor, P., McKelvey, D., & Kantra, L. (2017). College men’s and women’s masculine gender role strain and dating violence acceptance attitudes: Testing sex as moderator. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 18(2), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000044

O’Neil, J. M., & Crapser, B. (2011). Using the psychology of men and gender role conflict theory to promote comprehensive service delivery for college men: A call to action. In Masculinities in Higher Education: Theoretical and Practical Considerations (pp. 16–49). New York: Routledge.

Reidy, D. E., Smith-Darden, J. P., Cortina, K. S., Kernsmith, R. M., & Kernsmith, P. D. (2015). Masculine discrepancy stress, teen dating violence, and sexual violence perpetration among adolescent boys. Journal of Adolescent Health, 56(6), 619–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.02.009

Sabrina, T., Ratnawati, R., & Setyowati, E. (2016). Pengaruh peran gender, masculine dan feminine gender role stress pada tenaga administrasi Universitas Brawijaya (The effect of gender, masculinity and feminine gender role stress among administrative staff in Brawijaya University). Indonesian Journal of Women’s Studies, 4(1), 1–14.

Smith, R. M., Parrot, D. J., & Tharp, A. T. (2015). Deconstructing hegemonic masculinity: The roles of antifemininity, subordination to women, and sexual dominance in men’s perpetration of sexual aggression. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 16(2), 160–169. Retrieved from 10.1037/a0035956

Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17(3), 283–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251396017003001

Swartout, K. M., Parrott, D. K., Cohn, A. M., Hagman, B. T., & Gallagher, K. E. (2015). Development of the abbreviated masculine gender role stress scale. Psychological Assessment, 27(2), 489–500. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1037/a0038443

Tager, D., Good, G. E., & Brammer, S. (2010). “Walking over 'em”: An exploration of relations between emotion dysregulation, masculine norms, and intimate partner abuse in a clinical sample of men. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 11(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017636

Vagi, K. J., Rothman, E. F., Latzman, N. E., Tharp, A. T., Hall, D. M., & Breiding, M. J. (2013). Beyond correlates: A review of risk and protective factors for adolescent dating violence perpetration. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(4), 633–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9907-7

Vandello, J. A, & Bosson, J. K. (2013). Hard won and easily lost: A review and synthesis of theory and research on precarious manhood. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 14(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029826

Willie, T. C., Khondkaryan, E., Callands, T., & Kershaw, T. (2018). “Think like a man”: How sexual cultural scripting and masculinity influence changes in men’s use of intimate partner violence. Journal of Community Psychology, 61(1–2), 240–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12224

Wong, Y. J., Tsai, P. C., Liu, T., Zhu, Q., & Wei, M. (2014). Male asian international students’ perceived racial discrimination, masculine identity, and subjective masculinity stress: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 61(4), 560–569. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000038

World Health Organization. (2012). Understanding and addressing violence against women: Intimate partner violence. In World Health Organization. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1807166

Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., & Helfand, M. (2008). Ten years of longitudinal research on U.S. adolescent sexual behavior: Developmental correlates of sexual intercourse, and the importance of age, gender and ethnic background. Developmental Review, 28(2), 153–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2007.06.001

Zurbriggen, E. L. (2010). Rape, war, and the socialization of masculinity: Why our refusal to give up war ensures that rape cannot be eradicated. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(4), 538–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01603.x




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26555/humanitas.v17i1.13553

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



HUMANITAS: Indonesian Psychological Journal
ISSN 1693-7236 (print), 2598-6368 (online)
Email : humanitas@psy.uad.ac.id

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

web
statistics View My Stats