How do relational and personal attributes affect trust in adolescent friendship: An exploratory model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26555/humanitas.v17i1.12700Keywords:
benevolence, closeness, competence, integrity, reciprocity, support, trustAbstract
Trust is an important aspect in human relationship. According to previous research trust is influenced by 2 main attributes: personal (benevolence, integrity, and competence) and relational (support, closeness, and reciprocity) attribute. The study aimed to find a preliminary model to explain the association of personal and relational attributes in adolescent friendship. Two hundred and twenty participants (male=44.09% and female=55.91%) participated in the study. A survey method was used to collect the data. The design of this study was correlational design. Results from enter method in regression analysis show that six factors of personal and relational attributes influence trust at 44.5%. However, closeness had no significant influence on trust, so closeness was not included in the next analysis, the sequential analysis. The result shows that the relational attribute has higher influence on trust than personal attribute. Support and reciprocity factors which belong to relational attribute, has a higher contribution to trust in adolescent friendship than benevolence, integrity and competence – the latter three factors belonging to the personal attribute. Therefore building trust in friendship requires an emphasis on relational attributes of trust, especially that of support and reciprocity factors.
References
Bews, N., & Martins, N. (2002). An evaluation of the facilitators of trustworthiness. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 28(4), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v28i4.70
Bove, L. L., & Johnson, L. W. (2001). Customer relationships with service personnel: Do we measure closeness, quality or strength? Journal of Business Research, 54(3), 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00122-3
Burke, C. S., Sims, D. E., Lazzara, E. H., & Salas, E. (2007). Trust in leadership: A multi-level review and integration. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(6), 606–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.09.006
Butler, J. K. (1991). Toward understanding and measuring conditions of trust: Evolution of a conditions of trust inventory. Journal of Management, 17(3), 643–663. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700307
Carroll, M. N. (2002). Gender differences in trust and loyalty within single sex friendships. Loyola University.
Chong, B., Yang, Z., & Wong, M. (2003). Asymmetrical impact of trustworthiness attributes on trust, perceived value and purchase intention. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Electronic Commerce - ICEC ’03, 213–219. https://doi.org/10.1145/948005.948033
Ciairano, S., Rabaglietti, E., Roggero, A., Bonino, S., & Beyers, W. (2007). Patterns of adolescent friendships, psychological adjustment and antisocial behavior: The moderating role of family stress and friendship reciprocity. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(6), 539–548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025407080573
Connolly, R., & Bannister, F. (2008). Factors influencing Irish consumers’ trust in internet shopping. Management Research News, 31(5), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170810865154
Crosnoe, R., Cavanagh, S., & Elder, G. H. (2003). Adolescent friendships as academic resources: The intersection of friendship, race, and school disadvantage. Sociological Perspectives, 46(3), 331–352. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2003.46.3.331
Damon, W., & Lerner, R. M. (2008). Child and adolescent development. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (2004). The risk-based view of trust: A conceptual framework. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19(1), 85–116. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBU.0000040274.23551.1b
de Mooij, M., & Hofstede, G. (2010). The Hofstede model: Applications to global branding and advertising strategy and research. International Journal of Advertising, 29(1), 85–110. https://doi.org/10.2501/S026504870920104X
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeti, W. B. (2001). The job-demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0221-9010
Faturochman, & Minza, W. M. (2014). Exploring personal and relational trustworthiness. Unpublished Manuscript.
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2011). Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. In Advances in Behavioral Economics (pp. 510–532). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.229149
Ferris, D. L., Lian, H., Pang, Fi. X. J., & Keeping, L. M. (2010). Self-esteem and job performance: The moderating role of self-esteem contingencies. Personnel Psychology, 63(3), 561–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01181.x
Glanville, J. L., & Paxton, P. (2007). How do we learn to trust? A confirmatory tetrad analysis of the sources of generalized trust. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70(3), 230–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250707000303
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
Hurlock, E. B. (2004). Psikologi perkembangan (Developmental psychology). PT. Gramedia Pustaka.
Igarashi, T., Kashima, Y., Kashima, E. S., Farsides, T., Kim, U., Strack, F., Werth, L., & Yuki, M. (2008). Culture, trust, and social networks. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 11(1), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2007.00246.x
Johnson, A. J., Haigh, M. M., Craig, E. A., & Becker, J. A. H. (2009). Relational closeness: Comparing undergraduate college students’ geographically close and long-distance friendships. Personal Relationships, 16(4), 631–646. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2009.01243.x
Johnston, A. M., Mills, C. M., & Landrum, A. M. (2015). How do children weigh competence and benevolence when deciding whom to trust? Cognition, 144, 76–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.07.015
Khodyakov, D. (2007). Trust as a process: A three-dimensional approach. Sociology, 41(1), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038507072285
Ko, D. G. (2010). Consultant competence trust doesn’t pay off, but benevolent trust does! Managing knowledge with care. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(2), 202–213. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271011032355
Kumalasari, F., & Ahyani, L. N. (2012). Hubungan antara dukungan sosial dengan penyesuaian diri remaja di panti asuhan (The relationship of social support and self adjustment among teenager in orphanage). Jurnal Psikologi Pitutur, 1(1), 21–31.
Landrum, A. M., Mills, C. M., & Johnston, A. M. (2013). When do children trust the expert? Benevolence information influences children’s trust more than expertise. Developmental Science, 16(4), 622–638. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12059
Laursen, B., Noack, P., Wilder, D., & Williams, V. (2000). Adolescent perceptions of reciprocity, authority, and closeness in relationships with mothers, fathers, and friends. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24(4), 464–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/016502500750038017
Linden-Andersen, S., Markiewicz, D., & Doyle, A. B. (2009). Perceived similarity among adolescent friends: The role of reciprocity, friendship quality, and gender. Journal of Early Adolescence, 29(5), 617–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431608324372
Lindström, M. (2005). Social capital, the miniaturization of community and high alcohol consumption: A population-based study. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 40(6), 556–562. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agh190
Lunsky, Y., & Benson, B. A. (2001). Association between perceived social support and strain, and positive and negative outcome for adults with mild intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 45(2), 106–114. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2788.2001.00334.x
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.2307/258792
McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect-and-cognition-based trust formations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24–59. https://doi.org/10.2307/256727
Nielson, C. C. (1998). An empirical examination of the role of “closeness†in industrial buyer-seller relationships. European Journal of Marketing, 32(5/6), 441–463.
Palanski, M. E., Kahai, S. S., & Yammarino, F. J. (2011). Team virtues and performance: An examination of transparency, behavioral integrity, and trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0650-7
Rotenberg, K. J. (2010). Interpersonal trust during childhood and adolescence. Cambridge University Press.
Rotenberg, K. J., Fox, C., Green, S., Ruderman, L., Slater, K., Stevens, K., & Carlo, G. (2005). Construction and validation of a children’s interpersonal trust belief scale. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23(2), 271–293. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151005X26192
Rus, A., & IgliÄ, H. (2005). Trust, governance and performance: The role of institutional and interpersonal trust in SME Development. International Sociology, 20(3), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580905055481
Salazar, L. R. (2015). Exploring the relationship between compassion, closeness, trust, and social support in same-sex friendships. The Journal of Happiness & Well-Being, 3(1), 15–29.
Shultz, G. P. (2007). Foreword. In Bits, bytes, and balance sheets: The new economic rules of engagement in a wireless world (pp. IX–XII). Hoover Institution.
Simmel, G. (2011). The philosophy of money: Third enlarged edition. Taylor & Farncis e-Library.
Simpson, J. A. (2007). Psychological foundations of trust. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(5), 264–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00517.x
Talwar, V., & Renaud, S. J. (2010). Liar liar! Pants on fire: Detecting the trustworthiness of children’s statements. In Interpersonal Trust during Childhood and Adolescence (pp. 177–199). Cambridge University Press.
Tanis, M., & Postmes, T. (2005). A social identity approach to trust: Interpersonal perception, group membership and trusting behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(3), 413–424. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.256
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 70(4), 547–593. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070004547
Turner, E. R. (2002). The differences in the levels of trust in male and female same sex friendships. Loyola University.
Van Lange, P. A. M., & Balliet, D. (2015). Interdependence theory. In M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, J. A. Simpson, & J. F. Dovidio (Eds.), APA Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology, Volume 3: Interpersonal Relations (pp. 65–92). American Psychological Association.
Warris, A., & Rafique, R. (2009). Trust in friendship: A comparative analysis of male and female university students. Bulletin of Education and Research, 31(2), 75–84.
Weber, K., Johnson, A., & Corrigan, M. (2004). Communicating emotional support and its relationship to feelings of being understood, trust, and self-disclosure. Communication Research Reports, 21(3), 316–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090409359994
Wu, C. C., Huang, Y., & Hsu, C. L. (2014). Benevolence trust: A key determinant of user continuance use of online social networks. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 12(2), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-013-0216-1
Xie, Y., & Peng, S. (2009). How to repair customer trust after negative publicity: The roles of competence, integrity, benevolence, and forgiveness. Psychology & Marketing, 26(7), 572–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20289
Ying, Y. W. (2008). The buffering effect of self-detachment against emotional exhaustion among social work students. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 27, 27–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/15426430802114051
Yip, W., Subramanian, S. V, Mitchell, A. D., Lee, D. T. S., Wang, J., & Kawachi, I. (2007). Does social capital enhance health and well-being? Evidence from rural China. Social Science & Medicine, 64(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.08.027
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic License.