EFFECTIVENESS OF MISSOURI MATHEMATICS PROJECT (MMP) LEARNING APPROACH TO LEARNING TYPE OF TPS AND NHT TYPE ON ABILITY OF MATHEMATICS PROBLEM STUDENTS

Arif Masyari, Abdul Taram

Abstract


This study aims to determine is there a significant difference between the use MMP learning approach to TPS learning with the use MMP learning approach to NHT learning, and which is more effective between that lesson on math problem-solving ability. The population in this study were students of class XI MIPA MAN Yogyakarta III that consists of five classes. The sample in this study consists of two classes, that were XI MIPA 1 as the experimental class and XI MIPA 3 as the control class. The sampling technique used random sampling. The data collection method test and documentation. The research instrument is a problem solving test. Data analysis using t-test two parties and one party, but previously conducted test of normality and homogeneity. Based on the analysis of t-test two parties on mathematics problem-solving ability with a significance level of 5% and 55 degrees of freedom is obtained , indicating that there is a significant difference between the mathematics problem-solving ability using MMP learning approach to TPS learning with the use MMP learning approach to NHT learning, and Based on the analysis of t-test one parties with significance level of 5% and 55 degrees of freedom is obtained  indicates that the MMP learning approach to TPS learning more effective than the MMP learning approach to NHT learning on mathematics problem-solving ability.


Keywords


Effectiveness, MMP, learning of TPS, learning of NHT, mathematics problem-solving ability.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Good L, Thomas dan Grouws, A Douglas. (1979). The Missouri Mathematics Effectiveness Project: An experimental study in fourth-grade classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology. Vol.71, No. 3.

Hamzah, A dan Muhlisrarini. 2014. Perencanaan dan Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

NCTM. 2000. Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. USA: Reston, VA

Depdiknas. 2006. Permendiknas Nomor 22 / 2006 tentang Standar Isi untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Polya, G. 1973. How To Solve It. United States of America: Princeton University Press

Ratumanan. 2015. Inovasi Pembelajaran Mengembangkan Peserta Didik Secara Optimal. Yogyakarta: Ombak.

Setiawan. 2008. Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika SMA. Yogyakarta: PPPPTK.

Shadiq, Fadjar. 2014. Pembelajaran Matemtika Cara Peningkatan Kemampuan Berfikir Siswa. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Slavin, E Robert dan Lake, Cynthia. (2007). Effective Programs in Elementary Mathematics: A Best-Evidence Synthesis. U.S.: Department of Education.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12928/admathedust.v4i12.17211

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


 
AdMathEduSt: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika
ISSN 2355-8199 (print) | 2775-5746 (online)
Organized by Mathematics Education Study Program
Faculty of Teacher Training and Education - Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
Published by Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
Website: http://journal.uad.ac.id/index.php/AdMathEdust/index
Email 1: harina.fitriyani@pmat.uad.ac.id
Email 2: admathedust@pmat.uad.ac.id
Office Address: Kantor Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, Lantai 7, Kampus 4 UAD, Jl. Ringroad Selatan, Tamanan, Kec. Banguntapan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55191, Indonesia

 

Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.