Laboratory Study of Polypropylene-based Honeycomb Core for Sandwich Composites
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/si.v19i2.21659Keywords:
Carbon fiber Glass fiber, Polypropylene (PP), Sandwich compositesAbstract
Nowadays, a structure of sandwich composites can be reinforced by with hybrid materials such as polypropylene core. Due to its high strength properties, the polypropylene is widely used in various fields of science, technology and engineering including aerospace applications. This research studies the well-known hybrid composites of a carbon fiber (CF) and glass fiber (GF) to evaluate the mechanical properties under the presence of sandwich composites reinforced with such fibers. The different curing-pressure values of each material workpiece have been investigated to determine the curing pressure, resulting in the superior performances and properties. The specimens are moulded by the hand lay-up (i.e., cloth laying angle) of the carbon fiber. By changing direction, the specimens are determined the greatest load-bearing direction based on the bending test. According to the ASTM standard on the strength determination, it is found that when the curing pressure increases, the flexural stress increases. By placing the material orientation in the order (i.e., [CF90 / CF0 / GF0 / Core / GF0 / CF0 / GF0]) provides the highest strength. When the strain reaches its maximum value, the specimens actually fracture. The fracture propagation is generally followed the fiber orientation of the fabric. The experimental results are observed that the lower curing pressure the thicker of the work piece and the fiber volume fraction decreases. The obtained results show that changes in the curing pressure and laying angle significantly affect the mechanical properties of the sandwich compositesReferences
ASTM. (1970). D790-03. Standard test methods for flexural properties of unreinforced and reinforced plastics and electrical insulating materials. West Conshohocken: ASTM Int’1.
Bhagwan, D., Lawrence, J. (1980). Analysis and Performance of Fiber Composites. Mechanics of Composite Materials, 48, 213.
Cho, J., Chen, J., Daniel. I.M. (2007). Mechanical enhancement of carbon fiber/epoxy composites by graphite nanoplatelet reinforcement. Scripta Materialia, 56, 685-688.
Compositesplaza. (2013). EGWFPL080-100. Technical data sheet. Netherlands: Compositesplaza BV.
Fuda, N., Weilong. C., Yingbin, H., Hui, W. (2017). Additive manufacturing of carbon fiber-reinforced plastic composites using fused deposition modeling: Effects of process parameters on tensile properties. Composites Material, 51(4), 451-462.
Gary, G.T., Gary, L.D., Daniel, W.G., Jerome, J.M., Thomas, A.P., Cameron, J.D., Michael, J.B. (1993). Physical properties of vapor-grown carbon fibers. Carbon, 31(7), 1039-1047.
Ghasemi, R.A., Moradi, M. (2016). Low thermal cycling effects on mechanical properties of laminated composite materials. Mechanics of Materials, 96, 126-137.
Masahiro, H., Takashi, I. (2013). Effect of Carbon Fiber Orientation and Helix Angle on CFRP Cutting Characteristics by End-Milling. Automation Technology, 7(3), 292-299.
Hoda, K., Seyed, A.S., Bob, M., Melanie, V. (2015) Effects of variation in autoclave pressure, temperature, and vacuum-application time on porosity and mechanical properties of a carbon fiber/epoxy composite. Composites Material. 46(16),1985-2004.
Jagannatha, D.T., Harish, G. (2015). Mechanical properties of carbon/glass fiber reinforced epoxy hybrid polymer composites. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research, 4(2), 131-137.
James, E.S. (1989). Oxidation protection for carbon fiber composites. Carbon, 27(5), 709-715.
Mohd Zulfli, H.N., Abu Bakar, A., Chow, S.W. (2013). Mechanical and thermal properties improvement of nano calcium carbonate-filled epoxy/glass fiber composite laminates. High Performance Polymer, 26(2), 223-229.
Neumeister, J., Jansson, S., Leckie, F. (1996). The effect of fiber architecture on the mechanical properties of carbon/carbon fiber
composites. Mechanical properties of composites, 44(2), 573-585.
Hossein, R., Heydar Mahmoudi, N.S., Shohreh, S.M., Alireza A. (2014). Mechanical Properties of Carbon Fiber/Epoxy Composites: Effects of Number of Plies, Fiber Contents, and Angle-Ply Layers. Polymer Engineering and Science, 54(11), 2676-2682.
Riccio, A., Raimondo, A., Sellitto, A., Acanfora, V., Zarrelli, M. (2016). Multifunctional Polypropylene Core for Aerospace Sandwich Composite Panels. Procedia Engineering, 167, 64-70.
Salernitano, E., Migliaresi, C. (2003). Composite materials for biomedical applications: a review. Biomaterials & Biomechanics, 1(1), 3-18.
Sezgin, E.F., Tanglu, M. (2010). Mechanical Behavior of Polypropylene-based Honeycomb-Core Composite Sandwich Structures. Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 29(10), 1569-1579.
Shang Han, W., Feng Yih W., Chen Chi, M., Wen Chi, C., Chun Ting K., Hsu Chiang, K. and Wei Jen, C. (2001). Mechanical, thermal and morphological properties of glass fiber and carbon fiber reinforced polyamide-6 and polyamide-6rclay nanocomposites. Material Letters, 49, 327-333.
Sungho, L., Jihoon, K., Bon Cheol, K., Junkyong, K., Yongsik, C. (2011). Effect of Process Condition on Tensile Properties of Carbon Fiber. Carbon Letters, 12(1), 26-30.
Torayca Innovation by Chemistry. (1999). UT70-20G. High performance carbon fiber Torayca. Tokyo: Toray Industries,Inc.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.