Interrelationship Performance Indicators Model of Sustainable Procurement in Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/si.v19i2.21464Keywords:
Sustainable procurement, Interpretative Structural Modeling, MICMAC Analysis, Higher EducationAbstract
Sustainable procurement is developing among practitioners and academics, but not many have done this research with the object of higher education institutions. This study succeeded in obtaining twelve indicators of sustainable procurement in higher education in Indonesia. The interpretive structural modeling method is used to model these indicators so that a four-level model is obtained, where the first level consists of seven indicators, the second level is one indicator, the third level is two indicators, and the fourth level is two indicators. In addition, the twelve indicators were also grouped using MICMAC analysis into four quadrants. Eight indicators are included in the autonomous indicators quadrant, four indicators are included in the independent indicators quadrant. Nothing is included in the dependent indicators and linkage indicators quadrant. This study proposes to the management of higher education to improve the performance of sustainable procurement, starting from level four indicators, namely the existence of routine monitoring and sustainability criteria (P12) and there is awareness of sustainable procurement on campus internals (P2).References
Chen, W. K., Nalluri, V., Lin, M. L., & Lin, C. T. (2021). Identifying decisive socio-political sustainability barriers in the supply chain of banking sector in india: Causality analysis using ism and micmac. Mathematics, 9(3), 1–23.
Digalwar, A. K., Mundra, N., Tagalpallewar, A. R., & Sunnapwar, V. K. (2017). Road map for the implementation of green manufacturing practices in Indian manufacturing industries: An ISM approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 24(5), 1386–1399.
Grob, S., & Benn, S. (2014). Conceptualising the adoption of sustainable procurement: An institutional theory perspective. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 21(1), 11–21.
Jadhav, J. R., Mantha, S. S., & Rane, S. B. (2014). Development of framework for sustainable Lean implementation : an ISM approach. J Ind Eng Int.
Jia, P., Diabat, A., & Mathiyazhagan, K. (2014). Analyzing the SSCM practices in the mining and mineral industry by ISM approach. Resources Policy, 1–10.
Kota, S., P Mishra, R., Vamsi Khrisna Jasti, N., & Kale, S. (n.d.). Sustainable Production System Critical Success Factors: an Interpretative Structural Modelling Approach. Procedia CIRP, 98, 324–329.
Leal Filho, W., Skouloudis, A., Brandli, L. L., Salvia, A. L., Avila, L. V., & Rayman-Bacchus, L. (2019). Sustainability and procurement practices in higher education institutions: Barriers and drivers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 231, 1267–1280.
Mcleod, F., Cherrett, T., Bailey, G., Allen, J., Browne, M., Leonardi, J., Aditjandra, P., & Zunder, T. H. T. (2015). Sustainable Procurement for Greener Logistics in the Higher Education Sector. Proceedings of the 20th Annual Logistics Research Network (LRN) Conference, 1–8.
Movahedipur, M., Zeng, J., Yang, M., & Wu, X. (2017). An ISM approach for the barrier analysis in implementing sustainable supply chain management: An empirical study. Management Decision, 55(8), 1824–1850.
Pacheco-Blanco, B., & Bastante-Ceca, M. J. (2016). Green public procurement as an initiative for sustainable consumption. An exploratory study of Spanish public universities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, 648–656.
Phogat, S., & Gupta, A. K. (2018). Development of framework for just-in-time implementation in maintenance: An ISM-MICMAC approach. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 24(4), 488–510.
Primadasa, R., Sokhibi, A., & Tauhida, D. (2019). Interrelationship of Green Supply Chain Management (GSCM) Performance Indicators for Palm Oil Industry in Indonesia.
Primadasa, R., & Tauhida, D. (2020). Hubungan antar Hambatan Green Supply Chain Management (GSCM) pada Industri Kelapa Sawit di Indonesia. Jurnal Optimasi Sistem Industri, 19(1), 40.
Raut, R., Narkhede, B., Gardas, B., & Luong, H. T. (2018). An ISM approach for the barrier analysis in implementing sustainable practices: The Indian oil and gas sector. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(4), 1245–1271.
Sindhu, S., Nehra, V., & Luthra, S. (2016). Identification and analysis of barriers in implementation of solar energy in Indian rural sector using integrated ISM and fuzzy MICMAC approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62, 70–88.
Singhal, D., Tripathy, S., Jena, S. K., Nayak, K. K., & Dash, A. (2018). Interpretive structural modelling (ISM) of obstacles hindering the remanufacturing practices in India. Procedia Manufacturing, 20, 452–457.
Soni, G., & Kodali, R. (2016). Interpretive structural modeling and path analysis for proposed framework of lean supply chain in Indian manufacturing industry. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(8), 501–515.
Walker, H., & Phillips, W. (2009). Sustainable procurement: Emerging issues. International Journal of Procurement Management, 2(1), 41–61.
Young, S., Nagpal, S., & Adams, C. A. (2016). Sustainable Procurement in Australian and UK Universities. Public Management Review, 18(7), 993–1016.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
