PEMODELAN PERMINTAAN YANG MEMPERTIMBANGKAN HARGA, LOKASI DAN REBATE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/si.v17i2.14325Keywords:
Analisis konjoin, survey, rebate-dependent demandAbstract
In accordance with Hottelling's Law, strategic location is a significant factor to ensure the success of a business, thus two businesses which sell the same product tend to choose a closed location. The real practice of this concept is seen in the competition of two big retailers which often open their shop nearby. However, in such competition, the location factor is merely not sufficient. It is necessary to consider other factors such as price and rebate or discount types given to their customers. This paper, particularly, aims to see the customers' preferences towards given attributes i.e. price, location, and discount types. The data is collected by
means of a survey with non-probability sampling that is judgmental sampling. The respondents are people reside in Surabaya, Sidoarjo, and nearby whose age between 15-45 years and having various profession. The data is then processed with conjoint analysis by which is used as a basis
to reconstruct a demand model considering the customer's preferences. The result shows that the attribute which is most considerable by respondents is the discount types, herein is a bundling product that comprises various products. This attribute has a preference level at 54.53%. The second prioritized attribute is the retailer location with a preference level at 24.28%. This means that a closer retailer is the most preferable by the respondent. Meanwhile, price is the last attribute considered by the respondent in choosing the retailer with a preference level at 21.28%. Thus, a respondent tends to pick a cheaper product after considering its discount type and the distance of retailer.
References
Arcelus, F. J., & Srinivasan, G. (2003). Scanbacks and direct rebates: manufacturer's tools against forward buying. International Transactions in Operational Research, 10(6), 619635.
Arcelus, F. J., Kumar, S., & Srinivasan, G. (2005). Retailer's response to alternate manufacturer's incentives under a single-period, price-dependent, stochastic-demand framework. Decision Sciences, 36(4), 599-626.
Aydin, G., & Porteus, E. L. (2008). Manufacturer-to-retailer versus manufacturer-to-consumer rebates in a supply chain. Retail supply chain management, 122, 237-270.
Berman, O., & Krass, D. (1988). Flow Intercepting Spatial Interaction Model: A New Approach to Optimal Location of Competitive Facilities. Location Science, 6(1-4), 41-65.
Bermen, O., Drezner, T., Drezner, Z., & Krass, D. (2014). Modeling Competitive Facility Location: New Approaches and results. Design Technologies and Applications, 156-181.
Chen, X., Li, C.-L., Rhee, B.-D., & Simchi-Levi, D. (2007). The impact of manufacturer rebates on supply chain profits. Naval Research Logistics, 54(6), 667-680.
Cho, S.-H., McCardle, K. F., & Tang, C. S. (2009). Optimal pricing and rebate strategies in a two-level supply chain. Production and Operations Management, 18(4), 426-446.
Demirag, O. C., Baysar, O., Keskinocak, P., & Swann, J. L. (2010). The effects of customer rebates and retailer incentives on a manufacturer's profits and sales. Naval Research Logistics, 57(1), 88-108.
Drezner, T., & Drezner, Z. (2011). The Gravity Multiple Server Location Problem. Computers and Operation Research, 38(3), 694-701.
Ha, A. Y., Shang, W., & Wang, Y. (2017). Manufacturer rebate competition in a supply chain with a common retailer. Production and Operations Management, 26, 2122-2136.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hotelling, H. (1929). Stability in competition. Economic Journal, 39(153), 41-57.
Huang, J., Leng, M., & Parlar, M. (2013). Demand functions in decision modeling: A comprehensive survey and research directions. Decision Sciences, 44(3), 557-609.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
