Male Neighbors’ Behavior: Bystander Effect in Domestic Violence Cases

Authors

  • Nido Dipo Wardana Universitas Airlangga
  • Margaretha Margaretha Universitas Airlangga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/jehcp.v7i3.9750

Abstract

This research was twofold and aimed to explore male neighbors’ behavior as bystanders of domestic violence (DV) cases. Study 1 used survey on 94 male respondents to obtain description about bystander behavior and examine the relationship between situational barriers, neighborhood cohesion, and bystander’s intention to help victims. Study 2 used qualitative approach with instrumental case study, involving three male participants to understand the dynamic of bystander effect on male neighbors who had witnessed DV. Bystander effect (BS) is a phenomenon in which individual is less likely to intervene in an emergency if bystander present. BS was analyzed based on three root psychological processes, namely: diffusion of responsibility, audience inhibition, and pluralistic ignorance; the three appeared in the bystander intervention stages. An important finding was the role of neighborhood cohesion which interacted with DV-supporting norm; such that bystanders from highly cohesive neighborhood were resistant to help victims of real DV cases although social cohesion was a notable predictor of intention to help. The evidences in this research expanded Latané’s (1981) theory of social impact as well as supporting Levine (1999) and Banyard and colleagues’ (2004) notion of distorted thinking as a root of bystander inaction. Implication of the findings for community-based interventions is discussed.

References

Banyard, V. L., Moynihan, M. M., & Plante, E. G. (2007). Sexual Violence Prevention through Bystander Education: An Experimental Evaluation. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(4), 463-481.

Banyard, V.L., Moynihan, M.M., Cares, A.C., & Warner, R. (2014). How Do We Know If It Works? Measuring Outcomes in Bystander-Focused Abuse Prevention on Campuses. Psychology of Violence, 1, 101-115.

Banyard, V.L., Plante, E.G., & Moynihan, M.M. (2004). Bystander Education: Bringing Broader Community Perspective to Sexual Violence Prevention. Journal of Community Psychology, 32(1), 61-79.

Baron, R. A. & Branscombe, N. R. (2012). Social Psychology, Thirteen Edition. USA: Pearson.

Berk, R.A., Berk, S.F., Newton, P.J., & Loseke, D.R. (1984). Cops on Call: Summoning the Police to the Scene of Spousal Violence. Law & Society Review, 18(3), 479-498.

Buckner, J. C. (1988). The Development of an Instrument to Measure Neighborhood Cohesion. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16(6), 771-791.

Burn, S. M. (2009). A Situational Model of Sexual Assault Prevention through Bystander Intervention. Sex Roles, 60, 779-792.

Chabot, H. F., Tracy, T. L., Manning, C. A., & Poisson, C. A. (2009). Sex, Attribution, and Severity Influence Intervention Decisions of Informal Helpers in Domestic Violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(10), 1696-1713.

Cismaru, M., Jensen, G., & Lavack, A. M. (2010). “If the Noise Coming from Next Door was Loud Music, You’d Do Something about Itâ€: Using Mass Media Campaigns Encouraging Bystander Intervention to Stop Partner Violence. Journal of Advertising, 39(4), 69-82.

Darley, J. M. & Latané, B. (1968). Bystander Intervention in Emergencies: Diffusion of Responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(4), 377-383.

Fischer, P., Greitemeyer, T., Pollozek, F., & Frey, D. (2006). The Unresponsive Bystander: Are Bystander More Responsive in Dangerous Emergencies?. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 267-278.

Fischer, P., Krueger, J. I., Greitemeyer, T., Vogrincic, C., Kastenmüller, A., Frey, D., Heene, M., Wicher, M., & Kainbacher, M. (2011). The Bystander-Effect: A Meta-Analytic Review on Bystander Intervention in Dangerous and Non-Dangerous Emergencies. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 517-537.

Flood, M. (2011). Building Men’s Commitment to Ending Sexual Violence Against Women. Feminism & Psychology, 21(2), 262-267.

Frye, V. (2007). The Informal Social Control of Intimate Partner Violence against Women: Exploring Personal Attitudes and Perceived Neighborhood Social Cohesion. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(8), 1001-1018.

Garcia, S. M., Waever, K., Moskowitz, G. B., & Darley, J. M. (2002). Crowded Minds: The Implicit Bystander Effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 843-853.

Gracia, E., García, F., & Lila, M. (2009). Public Response to Intimate Partner Violence Against Women: The Influence of Perceived Severity and Personal Responsibility. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12(2), 648-656.

Gracia, E., & Herrero, J. (2007). Perceived Neighborhood Social Disorder and Attitudes Toward Reporting Domestic Violence Against Women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22(6), 737-752.

Hoefnagels, C. & Zwikker, M. (2001). The Bystander Dilemma and Child Abuse: Extending the Latané and Darley Model to Domestic Violence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(6), 1158-1183.

Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind: Intercultural Cooperation and Its Importance for Survival, 3rd Ed. New York: McGraw Hill.

Hudson, J. M. & Bruckman, A. S. (2004). The Bystander Effect: A Lens for Understanding Patterns of Participation. The Journal of The Learning Science, 13(2), 165-195.

Katz, J. (2006). The Macho Paradox: Why Some Men Hurt Women and How All Men Can Help. Illinois: Sourcebook, Inc.

Kimmel, M. S. (2002). “Gender Symmetry†in Domestic Violence: A Substantive and Methodological Research Review. Violence Against Women, 8(11), 1332-1363.

Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Foubert, J. D., Brasfield, H. M., Hill, B., & Shelley-Tremblay, S. (2011). The Men’s Program: Does It Impact College Men’s Self-Reported Bystander Efficacy and Willingness to Intervene?. Violence Against Women, XX(X), 1-17.

Latané, B. (1981). The Psychology of Social Impact. American Psychologist, 36(4), 343-356.

Levine, M. (1999). Rethinking Bystander Nonintervention: Social Categorization and the Evidence of Witnesses at the James Bulger Murder Trial. Human Relations, 52(9), 1133-1155.

Margaretha, Nuringtyas, R., & Rachim, R. (2013). Trauma Kekerasan Masa Kanak dan Kekerasan dalam Relasi Intim. Makara Seri Sosial Humaniora, 17(1), 33-42. DOI: 10.7454/mssh.v17i1.1800

National Commission on Violence against Women. (2016, March). Kekererasan terhadap Perempuan Meluas: Negara Urgen Hadir Hentikan Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan di Ranah Domestik, Komunitas, dan Negara (Catatan Tahunan tentang Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan 2016). Jakarta: Authors.

National Commission on Violence against Women. (2017, October). Labirin Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan: Dari Gang Rape hingga Femicide, Alarm bagi Negara untuk Bertindak Tepat (Catatan Tahunan tentang Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan 2017). Jakarta: Authors.

Latané, B. & Nida, S. (1981). Ten Years of Research on Group Size and Helping. Psychological Bulletin, 89(2), 308-324.

Lazarus, K. & Signal, T. (2013). Who Will Help in Situations of Intimate Partner Violence: Exploring Personal Attitudes and Bystander Behaviors. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 2, 199-209.

Lembaga Bantuan Hukum APIK Jakarta. (2012, January 17). Lemahnya Penegakan Hukum atas Kasus-kasus Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan serta Meningkatnya Kriminalisasi dan Reviktimisasi Perempuan Korban (Catatan Tahunan 2011). Jakarta: Authors.

Levy, I. & Ben-David, S. (2015). Mechanism of Bystander-Blaming: Defensive Attribution, Counterfactual Thinking, and Gender. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 59(1), 96-113.

Loewenstein, G. & Small, D.A. (2007). The Scarecrow and the Tin Man: The Vicissitudes of Human Sympathy and Caring. Review of General Psychology, 11(2), 112-126.

McQuigg, R.J.A. (2011). International Human Rights Law and Domestic Violence: The Effectiveness of International Human Rights Law. London: Routledge.

Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, 3 Edition. London: SAGE Publications.

Rendsvig, R. K. (2014). Pluralistic Ignorance in The Bystander Effect: Informational Dynamics of Unresponsive Witnesses in Situations Calling for Intervention. Synthese, 191(11), 2471-2498.

Rich, M.D., Utley, E.A., Janke, K., & Moldoveanu, M. (2010). “I’d Rather Be Doing Something Else:†Male Resistance to Rape Prevention Program. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 18(3), 268-288.

Rutkwoski, G. K., Gruder, C. L., & Romer, D. (1983). Group Cohesiveness, Social Norms, and Bystander Intervention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(3), 545-552.

Schwartz, M. D. & DeKeseredy, W. S. (2008). Interpersonal Violence Against Women: The Role of Men. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 24(2), 178-185.

Suryanto, Putra, M. G. B. A., Herdiana, I., & Alfian, I. N. (2012). Pengantar Psikologi Sosial. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press.

Tice, D.M. & Baumeister, R.F. (1985). Masculinity Inhibits Helping in Emergencies: Personality Does Predict the Bystander Effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(2), 420-428.

Thornberg, R. (2007). A Classmate in Distress: Schoolchildren as Bystander and Their Reasons for How They Act. Social Psychology of Education, 10, 5-28.

Walker, L. E. (1999). Psychology and Domestic Violence Around the World. American Psychologist, 54(2), 21-29.

World Health Organization. (2013). Global and Regional Estimates of Violence against Women: Prevalence and Health Effects of Intimate Partner Violence and Non-Partner Sexual Violence. Itali: Authors.

Xu, Q. & Anderson, A. (2010). Domestic Violence in Asian Cultures. In Ross, L. E. The War Against Domestic Violence (pp. 27-40). Boca Raton: CRC Press.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-10

Issue

Section

Articles