Comparison of Mathematics and Humanitarian Sciences Students' Metacognitive Strategies

Authors

  • Gholam Hossein Javanmard Javanmard

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/jehcp.v3i2.3723

Abstract

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the differences of using meta-cognitive strategies in high school students who study in the fields of mathematics and humanities. For do this, 140 high school students were selected randomly. The Swanson’s Meta-cognition Strategies Test was administrated for sample groups. The acquired means for two regroups were compared with t-test for two independent groups’ method. Results indicated that two groups were meaningfully differed from each other (sig=0.01) in using meta-cognitive strategies, and mean of students in mathematics field were high. Also there was a meaningful difference in task component between two groups (sig=0.002), and the mean of students in mathematics field was higher than from students in humanities field in this component. The high school students in mathematics field use more metacognitive strategies, especially task component, than the students in humanities field.

Keywords: metacognitive strategies, students, mathematics field, humanities field

Downloads

Issue

Vol 3 No 2 September 2014

Section

Articles

License

JEHCP used CC BY SA for copyright issues. This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit you and license their new creations under identical terms. This license is often compared to copy-free and open-source software licenses. All new works based on yours will carry the same license, so any derivatives will also allow commercial use. This is the license used by Wikipedia and is recommended for materials that would benefit from incorporating content from Wikipedia and similarly licensed projects.