Examining the Impact of Phubbing Behaviors on Toxic Disinhibition in Online Social Interactions

Authors

  • vivi sumanti UNIVERSITAS NEGERI PADANG
  • Afdal Afdal Faculty of Education, Department of Guidance and Counseling Padang State University Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/jehcp.v12i3.26825

Abstract

The study has two main objectives: firstly, to examine the relationship between phubbing and toxic disinhibition; secondly, to compare the levels of phubbing and toxic disinhibition based on gender and place of residence. This research adopts a cross-sectional design with a quantitative approach. The study employs a incidental sampling technique to collect data from 896 Indonesian college students across various provinces, including West Sumatra, Bali, Banten, Bengkulu, DKI Jakarta, DI Yogyakarta, Jambi, West Java, Central Java, East Java, South Kalimantan, West Kalimantan, Central Kalimantan, East Kalimantan, Riau Islands, Nanggroe Aceh, Papua, East Nusa Tenggara, Riau, West Sulawesi, North Sulawesi, South Sulawesi, and North Sumatra. Data analysis involves regression analysis and one-way ANOVA. The research findings reveal that 1) toxic disinhibition behavior is relatively common among Indonesian college students (59%), 2) phubbing behavior is also quite prevalent (69%), and 3) there is a significant correlation between phubbing and toxic disinhibition. 4) There is a significant difference in the level of toxic disinhibition between males and females, 5) there is a significant difference in the level of phubbing between participants residing in urban areas and those in suburban areas. The implications of this study emphasize the need to control phubbing behavior in order to reduce toxic disinhibition behavior among college students. A proactive counseling approach can be applied by counselors to address the issues of phubbing and toxic disinhibition.

References

Alonzo, M. dan Aiken, M. (2004). Flaming dalam komunikasi elektronik",Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. 36(3), 205–213.

APJI. (2017). Penetrasi & Perilaku Pengguna Internet Indonesia. Apjii (Vol. 2018).

Bayu. D. (2022). APJII: Pengguna Internet Indonesia Tembus 210 Juta pada 2022. https://dataindonesia.id/digital/detail/apjii-pengguna-internet-indonesia-tembus-210-juta-pada-2022

Etikan, I. (2017). Sampling and Sampling Methods. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 5(6), 5–7. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2017.05.00149

Handikasari, R. H., Jusuf, I., & Johan, A. (2018). Hubungan intensitas penggunaan media sosial dengan gejala depresi mahasiswa kedokteran (studi pada mahasiswa kedokteran tingkat akhir yang menggunakan kurikulum modul terintegrasi). Faculty of Medicine.

L Fitria1, I Ifdil, L Erwinda, Z Ardi, A Afdal, A P Sari, R P Fadli, I B Rangka, K Suranata, K Bariyyah, N. Z. and E. C. (2018). Exploring internet addiction on adolescents. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1114/1/012076

Liberty, L. J. (2022, February). Jumlah Pengguna Media Sosial Indonesia Capai 191,4 Juta per 2022. Suara.com.

Riyanto, G. P. (2022, October). Pengguna Internet di Indonesia Tembus 210 Juta pada 2022. Kompas.com.

Sugiyono. (2012). Memahami Penelitian Kuantitatif. Alfabeta.

Suler, J. (2004a). The Online Disinhibition Effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(3).

Suler, J. (2004b). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 7(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295

Wardani, A. setiono. (2021, January). Pengguna Internet Dunia Tembus 4,66 Miliar, Rata-Rata Online di Smartphone. Liputan 6.

Zuckerman, M. (1979). Beyond the optimal level of arousal. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbraum Associates.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-23

Issue

Section

Articles