Description of the Psychological Needs of Klitih Perpetrators in Yogyakarta Using Thematic Apperception Test (TAT)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/jehcp.v10i1.19175Abstract
This study aims to determine the psychological needs of klitih perpetrators in Yogyakarta. The main objective of this research was to describe the psychological needs of klitih perpetrators in Yogyakarta. This study’s participants consist of three males with the following criteria: (1) aged 18-24, (2) klitih perpetrators, and (3) lives in Yogyakarta. The research method used was qualitative research using a phenomenological approach. Data collection was conducted using the Personality Test (TAT), equipped with an interview. Data analysis was conducted using thematic analysis. The findings reveal five dominant psychological needs of klitih perpetrators, such as the need for warmth and support (need for affiliation) and the need to seek help or sympathy (need for succorance). The need for freedom (need for autonomy) appeared to emerge strongly against the pressure from permissive and less warm family background, causing the participant to spend more time outside their homes. The need for violence (need for aggression) and the need for recognition (need for achievement) also appeared to arise due to the social environment’s demands, which then influence the participant to commit acts of klitih. This research shows the psychological needs of klitih perpetrators that can be channeled through other activities. Therefore, alternative positive activities that can meet these five primary needs should be developed to prevent adolescents from being involved in acts of klitih in schools, families, communities, and the Yogyakarta government.
References
Aiken, L., & Groth-Marnat, G. (2009). Pengetesan dan pemeriksaan psikologi. Jakarta: Penerbit Indeks.
Alwisol. (2007). Psikologi kepribadian. Malang: UMM Press.
Anantasari. (2006). Menyikapi perilaku agresif anak. Yogyakarta: Kanisius
Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (2007). Tes psikologi (Edisi 7). Jakarta: Penerbit Indeks.
Andrianto & Alimron. (2018). Faktor-faktor penyebab kenakalan remaja di Lebak Mulyo Kecamatan Kemuning Kota Palembang. Jurnal PAI Raden Fatah, 1 (1), 82-104.
American Heritage Dictionary. (2010). Violence. http://ahdictionary.com/. 17 April 2019.
Bellak, L., & Abrams, D. (1997). The TAT, The CAT, The SAT in Clinical Use. 6th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Bushman, B. J., Newman, K., Calvert, S. L., Downey, G., Johns, M. D., Gottfredson, M., …Johns, D. W. W., (2016). Youth violence: What we know and what we need to know. American Psychological Association, 71(1), 17–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a00396.
Casmini & Supardi. (2020). Family Resilience: Preventive solution of Javanese youth klithih behavior. The Qualitative Report, 25(4), 947-961.
Fatimah, S., & Umuri, M. T. (2014). Faktor-faktor penyebab kenakalan remaja di desa Kemadang Kecamatan Tanjungsari Kabupaten Gunungkidul. Jurnal Citizenship, 4(1), 87-95.
Febriani, A. (2018). Klithih: Faktor resiko dan developmental pathway pelakunya. Humanitas, 15(2), 145–159.
Fuadi, A., Muti’ah, T., & Hartosujono. (2019). Faktor-faktor determinasi perilaku klitih. Jurnal Spirits: Khasanah Psikologi Nusantara, 9(2), 88-98.
Gungea, M., Jaunky, V.S., & Ramesh, V. (2017). Personality traits and juvenile deliquency. International Journal of Conception on Management and Social Sciences, 5(1), 2357-2787.
Hall, C. S., & Lindzey, G. (1993). Teori-teori holistik (Organismik – fenomenologis). Editor A. Supratiknya. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius.
James, L. R., & LeBreton, J. M. (2010). Assessing aggression using conditional reasoning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 30-35.
Macdonald, C. T., & Wood, J. K. (2018). The moderating effect of need for affiliation on conformity in response to group reactions. New Zealand Journal of Psychology (Online), 47(3), 28-37.
Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Dickson, N., Silva, P. A., & Stanton, W. (1996). Childhood-onset versus adolescent-onset antisocial conduct in males: Natural history from age 3 to 18. Development and Psychopathology. 8, 399–424. CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
Kennedy, T. D., Burnett, K. F., & Edmonds, W. A. (2011). Intellectual, behavioral, and personality of violent versus non-violent juvenile offenders. Aggressive Behavior, 37(4), 315–325.
Kipping, R. R., Campbell, R. M., MacArthur, G. J., Gunnell, D. J., & Hickman, M. (2012). Multiple risk behaviour in adolescence. Journal of Public Health, 34(suppl 1), i1–i2. http://doi.org/10.1093/.
Moranita, M., & Huda, MJN. (2019). The dynamics of adolescent self-concept in lembaga pembinaan khusus anak Wonosari Yogyakarta. Jurnal Psikologi Integratif, 7(2).104-121.
Oktaviani, D., & Lukmawati. (2018). Keharmonisan keluarga dan kenakalan remaja pada siswa kelas 9 MTS negeri 2 Palembang. Jurnal Psikologi Islami, 4(1), 52-60.
Ozdemir, A., Utkualp, N., & Pallos, A. (2016). Physical and psychosocial effects of the changes in adolescence period. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 9(2)717-723.
Prabowo, A. (2016). Kesejahteraan psikologis remaja di sekolah. Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Terapan.4 (2), 246-260.
Reber, A., & Reber, E. (2010). Kamus psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Sarasakti, FMA. (2013). Hubungan antara konformitas dan perilaku prososial pada remaja anggota geng di SMA Yogyakarta. Skripsi. Universitas Sanata Dharma Yogyakarta.
Sarwono, B. (2107). Mengendalikan kegaduhan sosial klitih dengan ketahanan keluarga. Prosiding Seminar dan Lokakarya Nasional Revitalisasi Laboratorium dan dan Jurnal Ilmiah dalam Implementasi Kurikulum Bimbingan dan Konseling berbasis KKNI. Malang.
Stahlberg, O., Anckarsater, H., & Nilsson, T. (2010). Mental health problems in youth committed to juvenile institutions: Prevalence and treatment needs. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 19(12), 893–903.
Sugiharto, K. (2017). Ada kelompok eksternal yang menghasut pelajar. Majalah Pranala. Hal 31.
Sumara, D., Humaedi, S., & Santoso, M. B. (2017). Kenakalan Remaja Dan Penanganannya. Jurnal Penelitian & PPM, 4 (2), 129-389.
Suyanto, B. (2010). Masalah Sosial Anak. Jakarta: Kencana.
Syafi’I, M. (2017). Yogyakarta darurat klitih. Yogyakarta: PUSHAM UII.
Tribun. (2018). http://jogja.tribunnews.com/2018/12/27/selama-2018-13-kasus-klitih-terjadi-di-yogyakarta-dua-korban-meninggal-dunia.
Yusri, F. & Jasmienti. (2017). Pengaruh pemenuhan kebutuhan remaja terhadap perilaku agresif siswa di PKBM Kasih Bundo Kota Bukittinggi. Journal of Islamic & Social Studies. 3, (1), 95-106.
WHO. (2019). Youth Violance. https://www.who.int/ akses 28 januari 2019.
Winarno, E. (2020). Klithih: Manifestasi penyimpangan agresivitas remaja. Media Informasi Penelitian Kesejahteraan Sosial, 44(1), 21-38.
