Systematic Review : Violation of Integrity from the Perspective of Psychology, Organizational Context and Community Culture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/jehcp.v9i4.17685Abstract
Abstract
The report on the crackdown on ICW corruption cases in 2019 explained that during 2019 there were 271 cases in Indonesia, as many as 29 (10.7%) cases occurred at the national level and 242 (89.3%) occurred in various regions in Indonesia. These data indicate the existence of integrity violations committed by public officials. The purpose of the literature review is to explore the psychological, organizational, and cultural factors of society that affect integrity violations. Research methods are systematic reviews. The results of the literature review: 1) psychological factors include low universal basic values and virtues, low moral judgment, low risk perception, low shame and guilt, high love of money, high machiavellianism, external motivation, authority, wealth, status and affiliation motivation, luxurious and hedonistic lifestyle and low happiness;Â Â Â Â 2) organizational factors are quite varied, including an ethical climate that is perceived negatively and self-oriented, less transparent organization, Human Resources and performance systems, politicization of the bureaucracy, the role model of the leader / superior is not good, several other factors; 3) Community cultural factors include high power distance, high masculinity, high collectivism and avoiding low uncertainty.
Key Word : Violation of Integrity, Psyhology, Organizational Context, Community Culture
References
Reference
Abraham,J.& Pea,A.G.(2018). Can proneness to moral emotions detect corruption? The
mediating role of ethical judgment based on unified ethics. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences. xxx (2018) 1-8
Abidin dan Siswadi Zainal Abidin dan A. Gimmy Prathama Siswadi. (2015). Psikologi Korupsi. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya
Akhrani, L.A. (2019) Kajian Religiusitas terhadap Sikap Korupsi Anggota Partai Politik. Interaktif. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, Vol 11, No 1 (2019)
Alamsyah,W.,Abid,L.,Sunaryanto,A.(2018).Laporan Tren Penindakan Kasus Korupsi Tahun 2018. Indonesia Corruption Watch.
Abraham,J & Pane, M.M.(2014). Corruptive Tendencies, Conscientiousness, and Collectivism. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 153 ( 2014 ) 132 – 147. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.048
Akanji, B.(2016). The Relationship between Culture and Corruption in Nigeria – Prospecting Culture Change in Dealing with this ‘Big Black Hole’. The Romanian Economic Journal, Year XX no. 63 March 2017
Arnaud,A. & Schminke,M.(2012). The Ethical Climate and Context of Organizations : A Comprehensive Model Organization. Science Articles in Advance, pp. 1–14
Barnar,A.,Schurink,W. & Beer, M.D.(2008). A conceptual framework of integrity SA Journal of Industrial Psychology Vol. 34 No.2 pp.40–49. http://www.sajip.co.za
Butler,G.G.L.(2001).Some Personal Reflections on Integrity. Purdue University Press West Lafayette, Indiana
Borlea,S.N., Achim, M.V.,& Daniela Rus, A.I.(2019).Behavioral Determinants Of Corruption. A Cross-Country Survey. Studia Universitatis “Vasile Goldis†Arad. Economics Series Vol 29 Issue 1/2019. ISSN: 1584-2339; (online) ISSN: 2285 – 3065. DOI: 10.2478/sues-2019-0002
Campbell, J.L., and A.S. Göritz. (2013). “Culture Corrupts! A Qualitative Study of Organizational Culture in Corrupt Organizationsâ€. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(3): 291-311.
Cohen,T.R.(2011), Wolf,S.T., Panter, A.T.,Chester A. and Insko, C.A. Introducing the GASP Scale:A New Measure of Guilt and Shame Proneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2011,Vol. 100, No. 5, 947–966 0022-3514. © 2011 American Psychological Association
Cohen,T.R.(2009).Moral Emotions and Unethical Bargaining:The Differential Effects of Empathy and Perspective Taking in Deterring Deceitful Negotiation. Journal of Business Ethics (2010) 94:569–579-Springer 2009,DOI 10.1007/s10551-009-0338-z
