Psychometric Properties of Speed Processing Ability Test: A Pilot Project

Authors

  • Fitri Andriani Airlangga University
  • Cholicul Hadi Airlangga University
  • Urip Purwono Padjajaran University
  • Siti Sulasmi Universitas Airlangga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/jehcp.v8i2.12680

Abstract

This study aims to examine the psychometric properties of a processing speed ability test constructed based on the Cattel-Horn-Carroll theory. According to Cattel-Horn-Carroll theory, processing speed ability is the ability that supports general intelligence. It has a significant effect on general intelligence (about 0.7). There are three narrow abilities of processing speed ability (i.e. perceptual speed, number facility and rate of test taking). 299 items of three narrow abilities were composed and trialed on 137 people. Data was analyzed using ITEMAN to select items and to estimate test reliability. Result shows that the tests under investigation have sufficient psychometric properties and adequate reliability.

References

AERA, A. & N. (1999). Standards: Educational And Psychological Testing,. Washington: American Educational Reseach Association.

AERA, APA, & NCME. (2014). The Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing.

Aiken, L. R. (2003). Psychological: Testing And Assessment. New York: Pearson Education Group, Inc.

Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological Testing (7th Ed). New York: Prentice Hall.

Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human Cognitive Abilities A Survey of Factor-Analytic Studies. New York: Cambridge.

Chadha, N. K. (2009). Applied Psychometry. New Delhi: Sage Publication. https://doi.org/10.4135/9788132108221

Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (2008). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Cengage Learning. Mason: Cengage Learning.

Domino, G., & Domino, M. L. (2006). Psychological Testing: An Introduction (2nd ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v35i1.807

Flanagan, D. P., & Harrison, P. L. (2005). Contemporary intellectual assessment. New York: The Guilford Press.

Flanagan, D. P., & Mcgrew, K. S. (1998). Interpreting Intelligence Tests from Contemporary Gf-Gc Theory : Joint Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the WJ-R and KAIT in a Non-White Sample, 36(2), 151–182.

Gottfredson, L., & Saklofske, D. H. (2009). Intelligence : Foundations and Issues in Assessment. Canadian Psychological Association, 50(3), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016641

Gregory, R. J. (2011). Psychological Testing History, Principles, and Aplications. Boston: Pearson Eucation, Inc.

Kruk, R. S., & Willows, D. M. (2001). Backward pattern masking of familiar and unfamiliar materials in disabled and normal readers. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18(1), 19–37.

Lawshe, C. (1975). A Quantitative Approach To Content Validity. Personnel Psychology, (1), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x

Lohman, D. F., & Gambrell, J. L. (2012). Using Nonverbal Tests to Help Identify Academically Talented Children. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911428194

Lohman, D. F., Korb, K. A., Lakin, J. M., Korb, K. A., & Lakin, J. M. (2008). Identifying Academically Gifted English- A Comparison of the Raven , NNAT , and CogAT. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(4), 276–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986208321808

Marnat, G. G. (2003). Handbook Of Psychological Assessment (4th Ed.). New Jersey: John Willey & Sons, Inc.

Mather, N., & Wendling, B. J. (2005). Linking Cognitive Assessment Results to Academic Interventions for Students with Learning Disabilities. In Contemporary Intellectual Assesment: Theories (pp. 269–294). New York: The Guilford Press.

Mcgrew, K. S. (2009). Editorial CHC Theory And The Human Cognitive Abilities Project : Standing On The Shoulders of The Giants of Psychometric Intelligence Research. Intelligence, 37(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2008.08.004

Mcgrew, K. S., & Flanagan, D. P. (1998). The Intelligence Test Desk Reference (ITDR): Gf-Gc Cross-Battery Assessment. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Naglieri, J. A., Ford, D. Y., Naglieri, J. A., & Ford, D. Y. (2003). Gifted Child Quarterly Addressing Underrepresentation of Gifted Minority Children Using the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test ( NNAT ). https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620304700206

Newton, J. H., & McGrew, K. (2010). Introduction to the special issue: Current Reseacrh in Cattel-Horn-Carrol Based Assessment. Psychological in the School, 47(7).

Shultz, K. S., Whitney, D. J., & Zickar, M. J. (2013). Measurement Theory in Action (2nd Ed). London: Routledge.

Sukadji, S. (1998). Perkembangan Konsep, Teori, Dan Pengukuran Inteligensi. Pidato pengukuhan Upacara Penerimaan Jabatan Guru Besar Ilmu Psikologi Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Indonesia.

Swerdlik, M. E., & Cohen, R. L. (2005). Psychological Testing and Asessment:An Introduction to Test and Measurement (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Urbina, S. (2004). Essential of Psychologycal Testing. (A. S. Kaufman & N. L. Kaufman, Eds.). New Jersey: John Willey & Sons, Inc.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-30

How to Cite

Andriani, F., Hadi, C., Purwono, U., & Sulasmi, S. (2019). Psychometric Properties of Speed Processing Ability Test: A Pilot Project. Journal of Educational, Health and Community Psychology, 8(2), 64–84. https://doi.org/10.12928/jehcp.v8i2.12680

Issue

Section

Articles