Validity Analysis of Learners' Self- Efficacy Instrument Using Rasch Model

Authors

  • Setiawai Setiawati Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Dodi Suryana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Shafa Amartya Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/psikopedagogia.v12i1.25619

Keywords:

self-efficacy, validitas, reliabilitas, rasch model

Abstract

The issue of items that are not independent, not linear, do not have value accuracy and missing data errors, thus the research aims to test the analysis of the construct validity of the self-efficacy instrument, the research uses a quantitative approach with a cross sectional survey design, then the validity analysis uses the Rasch model with the Winsteps version 3.73 application. The results of this study are (1) all items of the Self-efficacy revealing instrument meet the standard criteria as a measuring instrument. (2) Cronbach Alpha as a measure of the interaction between the person and the item as a whole, has a value that is included in the good category. (3) Person Reliability as an indicator of the constancy of respondents' answers, the results of its value are included in the sufficient category. While (4) Item Reliability as an indicator of the quality of items on the instrument, its value is included in the excellent category. (5) The average difficulty level of items is below the ability of junior high school students, so it is easy to understand. The instrument can be used as a need assessment for students in measuring self-efficacy ability curately

References

Andrich, D. (1978). Relationships Between the Thurstone and Rasch Approaches to Item Scaling. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2(3), 451–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167800200319

Andrich, D. (2003). Conditional Pairwise Estimation in the Rasch Model for Ordered Response Categories using Principal Components. Journal of Applied Measurement, 4(3), 205–221. https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/0141497102

Andrich, D. (2011). Rating scales and Rasch measurement. In Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (Vol. 11, Issue 5, pp. 571–585). https://doi.org/10.1586/erp.11.59

Arafah, K., Arafah, A. N. B., & Arafah, B. (2020). Self-concept and self-efficacy’s role in achievement motivation and physics learning outcomes. Opción: Revista de Ciencias …. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7667445

Bandura, A. (1982). Self-Efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency. 37(2), 122–147.

Bandura, A., & Bandura, A. (2010). Perceived Self-Efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning Perceived Self-Efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning. September 2013, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802

Bandura, A., & Locke, E. A. (2003). Negative Self-Efficacy and Goal Effects Revisited. 88(1), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.87

Chen, G., & Gully, S. M. (2001). Validation of a New General Self-Efficacy Scale. 4(1).

Drummond, J. (1997). Childbirth confidence: Validating the childbirth self-efficacy inventory (CBSEI) in an Australian sample. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26(3), 613–622. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.t01-24-00999.x

Frolik, J. (2001). A confidence-based approach to the self-validation, fusion and reconstruction of quasi-redundant sensor data. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 50(6), 1761–1769. https://doi.org/10.1109/19.982977

Joo, Y. (2000). Self-Efficacy for Self-Regulated Learning , Academic Self-Efficacy , and Internet Self-Efficacy in Web-Based Instruction. 48(2), 5–17.

Lidinillah, D. A. M., Aprilia, M., Suryana, D., & Ahmad, A. B. (2020). Development of creativity instrument through Rasch model analysis. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 1620–1627. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080455

Logan, J. D. (2014). The relationship among counseling supervision satisfaction, counselor self-efficacy, working alliance and multicultural factors. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.

Mattingly, B. A., & Jr, G. W. L. (2013). An expanded self is a more capable self: The association between self-concept size and self-efficacy. Self and Identity. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2012.718863

Muslihin, H. Y., Suryana, D., Ahman, Suherman, U., & Dahlan, T. H. (2022). Analysis of the Reliability and Validity of the Self-Determination Questionnaire Using Rasch Model. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15212a

People, A. B. (2017). 1 . Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies.

Petrillo, J. (2015). Using classical test theory, item response theory, and rasch measurement theory to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures: A comparison of worked examples. Value in Health, 18(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2014.10.005

Polat, M., Turhan, N. S., & Toraman, Ç. (2022). Comparison of Classical Test Theory vs. Multi-Facet Rasch Theory in writing assessment. … Journal of Education and Instruction.

Stankov, L., Lee, J., Luo, W., & Hogan, D. J. (2012). Confidence: A better predictor of academic achievement than self-efficacy, self-concept and anxiety? Learning and Individual Differences. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608012000799

Sullivan, B. (2006). Negotiator confidence: The impact of self-efficacy on tactics and outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(5), 567–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.09.006

Taufiq, A., Yudha, E. S., Md, Y. H., & Suryana, D. (2021). Examining the Supervision Work Alliance Scale: A Rasch Model Approach. The Open Psychology Journal, 14(1), 179–184. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874350102114010179

Vance, A. (2017). Delineating among parenting confidence, parenting self-efficacy, and competence. Advances in Nursing Science, 40(4). https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0000000000000179

Wang, C. W., & Neihart, M. (2015). Academic self-concept and academic self-efficacy: Self-beliefs enable academic achievement of twice-exceptional students. Roeper Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2015.1008660

Published

2024-09-12

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 1: June 2023

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with PSIKOPEDAGOGIA agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.