Analisis Budaya K3 dengan Nordic Occupational Safety Climate Questionnaire dan Safety Culture Maturity Model

Authors

  • Alidina Nur Afifah Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta
  • Suseno Hadi Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/kesmas.v12i2.9259

Keywords:

nordic occupational safety climate questionnaire, safety climate, safety culture, safety culture maturity level, safety culture maturity model

Abstract

Background: Implementation and good practice of Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) based on state regulation should be sufficient for a company to promote safety culture. However, “Zero Accident†as its measurable goal has not been consistently achieved, thus we can deduce that OHS practice has not gained its optimum level. We need to know why this gap happens; which safety culture elements are considered as dominant obstacle and support factors at the same time. The research purpose is to measure safety culture maturity level as well as factors that influence safety culture in a company, as case study PT X. Method: As research designs, analytical descriptive and cross-sectional design using quantitative and qualitative approaches were mixed together. The research samples consisted of 96 individuals and 5 key informants. Data was gathered using NOSACQ-50 questionnaire, SCMM questionnaire, and in-depth interviews. Its independent variables were OHS priority management, commitment and competency, OHS empowering management, OHS equality management, worker commitment on OHS, priority and risk acceptance, communication in OHS practice, learning and trust between co-workers in OHS competency, confidence level on OHS system effectivity, work duration, education level, and job position, whilst the only dependent variable was safety culture maturity level. Result: The research result showed that there were correlations between all independent variables of NOSACQ-50 components and safety culture maturity level. It was also concluded that OHS priority management and commitment and competency were both considered as the most influential factors to safety culture (OR=6,29). Following up the research result, it is recommended to the company to officially state Safety Culture as OHS department vision, to improve training management especially for increasing training participation from each business unit, to educate employees to have better mindset on punishment and incident reporting activities, and to improve communication effectiveness within employees related to OHS practice. Keywords: Safety Culture, Safety Climate, Safety Culture Maturity Level, NOSACQ-50, SCMM.

Author Biographies

Alidina Nur Afifah, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

Community Medicine Department, Medicine and Health Faculty

Suseno Hadi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

Medicine and Health Faculty

References

International Labor Organization. International Labor Organization. 2016.

BPJS Ketenagakerjaan. Jumlah Kecelakaan Kerja di Indonesia Masih Tinggi. 2016.

Kines P, Lappalainen J, Mikkelsen KL, Olsen E, Pousette A, Tharaldsen J, et al. Nordic Safety Climate Questionnaire (NOSACQ-50): A new tool for diagnosing occupational safety climate. Int J Ind Ergon. 2011 Nov 1;41(6):634–46.

Lawrie M, Parker D, Hudson P. Investigating employee perceptions of a framework of safety culture maturity. Saf Sci. 2006 Mar 1;44(3):259–76.

Hudson P. Safety Culture Theory and Practice. Leiden University For Safety Sciences; 2001.

Cooper D. Surfacing Your Safety Culture. In Germany: Akademis Loccum; 2002.

Cooper D. Safety Culture. Prof Saf. 2002;47(6):30–6.

Filho APG, Andrade JCS, Marinho MM de O. A safety culture maturity model for petrochemical companies in Brazil. Saf Sci. 2010 Jun 1;48(5):615–24.

Environment NRC for TW. Safety Climate Questionnaire - NOSACQ-50.

Yousefi Y, Jahangiri M, Choobineh A, Tabatabaei H, Keshavarzi S, Shams A, et al. Validity Assessment of the Persian Version of the Nordic Safety Climate Questionnaire (NOSACQ-50): A Case Study in a Steel Company. Saf Health Work. 2016 Dec;7(4):326–30.

Kurniawati ID. Masa Kerja dengan Job Engagement pada Karyawan. J Ilm Psikol Terap. 2014;2(2):311–24.

Geller ES. The Psychology of Safety Handbook. Florida: CRC Press; 2001.

Seo D-C, Torabi MR, Blair EH, Ellis NT. A Cross-Validation of Safety Climate Scale Using Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach. J Safety Res. 2004;35(4):427–45.

Cox S, Tomás JM, Cheyne A, Oliver A. Safety Culture: The Prediction of Commitment to Safety in the Manufacturing Industry. Br J Manag. 9(s1):3–11.

Hudson P. Implementing a safety culture in a major multi-national. Saf Sci. 2007 Jul 1;45(6):697–722.

Pawlowski A, Jansson M, Sköld M, Rottenberg ME, Källenius G. Tuberculosis and HIV Co-Infection. PLOS Pathog. 2012 Feb;8(2):1–7.

Nordlöf H, Wiitavaara B, Winblad U, Wijk K, Westerling R. Safety culture and reasons for risk-taking at a large steel-manufacturing company: Investigating the worker perspective. Saf Sci. 2015 Mar 1;73:126–35.

Gadd S, Collins AM. Safety Culture: A Review of Literature. Heal Saf Lab; 2002.

Conchie SM, Donald IJ. The Functions and Development of Safety-Specific Trust and Distrust. Saf Sci. 2008 Jan 1;46(1):92–103.

Geller ES. 10 Leadership Qualities for Total Safety Culture. Agricultural and Environmental Science Database. Am Soc Saf Eng. 2000;38–41.

Guldenmund FW. The Nature of Safety Culture: A Review of Theory and Research. Saf Sci. 2000 Feb 1;34(1):215–57.

Schein EH. Organizational Culture and Leadership. 4 edition. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass; 2010. 464 p.

Håvold JI. Measuring Occupational Safety: From Safety Culture to Safety Orientation? Policy Pract Health Saf. 2005 Jan 1;3(1):85–105.

Mearns KJ, Flin R. Assessing the state of organizational safety—Culture or climate? Curr Psychol J Diverse Perspect Diverse Psychol Issues. 1999;18(1):5–17.

Cooper D. Towards a model of safety culture. Saf Sci. 2000 Nov 1;36(2):111–36.

Cooper D. Improving Safety Culture: A Practical Guide. London: John Wiley And Sons, Ltd; 2001.

Downloads

Published

2018-09-17