Appendicitis Clinical Pathway Implementations Compliance Evaluation in Hospital

Authors

  • Adi Indra Wijaya University of Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
  • Arlina Dewi University of Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
  • Ekorini Listiowati University of Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/kesmas.v11i2.6871

Keywords:

clinical pathway, appendicitis, hospital management

Abstract

Background: Clinical pathway (CP) is a collaborative guidance for patients treatments that focused on diagnosis, clinical problems, and stages of care. CP implementation becomes a guideline on hospital quality and safety improvement for the patient services. Method: The research used a descriptive-qualitative mixed methods. Primary data collected through medical record and secondary data is done by interview and observation by using CP format. Results: From medical records total, 23 cases were found that met the inclusion criteria. The acute appendicitis case in adults is more than children in number (3,6:1). Acute appendicitis CP compliance is 86%. There are three problems in CP compliance of acute appendicitis i.e doctor's visit adherence (physician in charge of patient 87%, 0% anesthesia), 65% adherence therapy compliance, and 52% inpatient admission. The root of the problem is the lack of socialization, monitoring, and evaluation of established standards. Some activity variations may occur during each process from time to time that will produce a variety of the outcomes as well. How to reduce process variation is to standardize. The process of standardization includes the preparation, socialization, monitoring, control, evaluation and revision of thew standards. CP profit is that it could reduce variation, is a professional requirement, and the basis for quality measurement. Implementation of good standards will ensure the safety of patients and the healthcare providers. Conclusion: Almost all employees have conducted medical record (MR) in accordance with clinical pathway criteria as well, but the CP sheet is not included in the MR

References

Lee JH, Park YS, Choi JS. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in South Korea: national registry data. J Epidemiol. 2010;20(2):97–105.

Andayani PE. Clinical Pathway Terintegrasi dan Reformasi Pembayaran Provider Kerjasam Antara NICE International dengan CNHDRC (China National Health Development Research Center). Pusat Kebijakan Manajemen Kesehatan; 2015.

Hardin DM. Acute Appendicitis : Review and Update. American Family Physician; 1999.

Panella M, Marchisio S, Di Stanislao F. Reducing clinical variations with clinical pathways: do pathways work? Int J Qual Health Care J Int Soc Qual Health Care. 2003 Dec;15(6):509–21.

Djasri H. Peran Clincal Pathways dalam Sistem Jaminan Sosial Nasional Bidang Kesehatan: Materi Workshop INA-CBG [Internet]. Institut manajemen Rumah Sakit PERSI; 2013. Available from: http://www.pdpersi.co.id/kegiatan/bahan_diskusi/ina_cbg/4.peran_clinical_pathway.pd

Guo C, Zou Z. The Effect of Clinical Pathway in Patients with Acute Complicated Appendicitis. Surg Sci. 2016 Jun 21;07(07):286.

Shogilev DJ, Duus N, Odom SR, Shapiro NI. Diagnosing Appendicitis: Evidence-Based Review of the Diagnostic Approach in 2014. West J Emerg Med. 2014 Nov;15(7):859–71.

El Baz N, Middel B, van Dijk JP, Oosterhof A, Boonstra PW, Reijneveld SA. Are the outcomes of clinical pathways evidence-based? A critical appraisal of clinical pathway evaluation research. J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Dec;13(6):920–9.

Machmud R. Manajemen Mutu Pelayanan Kesehatan. J Kesehat Masy Andalas. 2008 Mar 1;2(2):186–90.

Vanhaecht K, De Witte K, Depreitere R, Sermeus W. Clinical pathway audit tools: a systematic review. J Nurs Manag. 2006 Oct;14(7):529–37.

Downloads

Published

2017-09-28