Pengembangan instrumen penilaian untuk mengukur kemampuan berpikir kritis pada materi dinamika partikel secara online

Authors

  • Safira Safira Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika, Universitas Lampung
  • Eko Suyanto Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika, Universitas Lampung
  • I Dewa Putu Nyeneng Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika, Universitas Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/jrkpf.v8i2.21173

Abstract

Abstrak. Sebagian besar peserta didik SMA, terbiasa berpikir secara instan, terutama pada pelajaran sains yang membutuhkan tingkat berpikir secara kritis. Instrumen penilaian yang berfokus pada penerapan Hukum Newton I, II, III, khususnya instrumen yang tidak menggunakan perhitungan angka, masih sulit ditemukan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan instrumen penilaian jenis uraian yang mengukur kemampuan berpikir kritis materi dinamika partikel, serta menguji kebakuan instrumen penilaian. Metode penelitian menggunakan Reseacrh and Development dengan langkah: mendefinisikan konstruk dan tujuan, menentukan format, konstruksi butir soal, pembuatan panduan penilaian, validasi teoritik, uji lapangan, analisis kebakuan, dan revisi. Uji coba dilakukan kepada 67 peserta didik yang telah mempelajari dinamika partikel. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan 8 butir soal valid dengan reliabilitas 0,86 kriteria sangat tinggi, taraf kesukaran: 1 sukar dan 9 sedang, daya pembeda: 2 baik sekali, 2 baik, 4 cukup, dan 2 tanpa daya pembeda. Instrumen penilaian ini dapat mengukur, sekaligus melatih peserta didik dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis.

Kata kunci: Asesmen Fisika, SMA, Tes Essay

 

Abstract. High school students are used to passive thinking, even in a science subject. Commonly the content of the material is not conveyed. Assessment instruments that focus on applying Newton's Laws, especially without numerical calculations, are still hard to find. The research aiming to develop the assessment instrument for measure critical thinking in the dynamic particle subject, then test the standardization of the instrument.  The research method used Research and Development, with the steps: defining the construct, determining the format, making an assessment guideline, theoretical validation, field testing, and standardization analysis. Trial of 67 students who have studied dynamics particle subject. The test results concluded eight valid questions, with a reliability of 0.86 consider very high value, with the level of difficulty: one difficult question and nine medium questions, and discrimination power: two very discriminate, two discriminate, four fair, and two without discrimination questions. This instrument can evaluate, as well as train students in improving critical thinking skills.

Keywords: Physics Assessment, High-School, Essay Test

References

M. Kang, H. Heo, L. Jo, J. Shin, and J. Seo, “Developing an educational performance indicator for new millennium learners,†J. Res. Technol. Educ., vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 157–170, 2010, doi: 10.1080/15391523.2010.10782567.

S. C. Kong, “Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy,†Comput. Educ., vol. 78, pp. 160–173, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.009.

O. Sarigoz, “Assessment of the High School Students’ Critical Thinking Skills,†Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 46, pp. 5315–5319, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.430.

D. F. Halpern, Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking, Fifth Edition, New York: Psychology Press, 2014.

R. Stobaugh, Assessing critical thinking in middle and high schools: Meeting the Common Core, New York: Routledge, 2013.

F. Mabruroh and A. Suhandi, “Construction of Critical Thinking Skills Test Instrument Related The Concept on Sound Wave,†J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 812, p. 12056, 2017, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012056.

D. T. Tiruneh, M. De Cock, A. G. Weldeslassie, J. Elen, and R. Janssen, “Measuring Critical Thinking in Physics: Development and Validation of a Critical Thinking Test in Electricity and Magnetism,†Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 663–682, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10763-016-9723-0.

W.-J. Shim and K. Walczak, “The Impact of Faculty Teaching Practices on the Development of Students’ Critical Thinking Skills,†Int. J. Teach. Learn. High. Educ., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 16–30, 2012.

T. Carlgren, “Communication, Critical Thinking, Problem Solving: A Suggested Course for All High School Students in the 21st Century,†Interchange, vol. 44, no. 1–2, pp. 63–81, 2013, doi: 10.1007/s10780-013-9197-8.

S. C. Choy, “Reflective Thinking and Teaching Practices: a Precursor for Incorporating Critical Thinking Into the Classroom?,†Online Submiss., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 167–182, 2012.

J. Sermeus, M. De Cock, and J. Elen, “Critical Thinking in Electricity and Magnetism : an Assessment Tool for Secondary School Students, †in European Science Education Research Association (ESERA), Date: 2017/08/21-2017/08/25, Location: Dublin, 2010, pp. 2–4.

P. K. Murphy, M. L. Rowe, G. Ramani, and R. Silverman, “Promoting Critical-Analytic Thinking in Children and Adolescents at Home and in School,†Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 561–578, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s10648-014-9281-3.

L. M. Marin and D. F. Halpern, “Pedagogy for developing critical thinking in adolescents: Explicit instruction produces greatest gains,†Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2010.08.002.

OECD, PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do, Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019.

OECD, PISA 2018: Insights and Interpretations, Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019.

W. Wartono, M. N. Hudha, and J. R. Batlolona, “How are the physics critical thinking skills of the students taught by using inquiry-discovery through empirical and theorethical overview?,†Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 691–697, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.12973/ejmste/80632.

T. Sugiarti, I. Kaniawati, and L. Aviyanti, “Development of Assessment Instrument of Critical Thinking in Physics at Senior High School,†J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 812, p. 12018, 2017, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012018.

R. Herpiana, U. Rosidin, and A. Abdurrahman, “Development of Instruments to Train Critical and Creative Thinking Skills in Physics Assessment for High School Students’ Learning,†J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1155, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012046.

J. Machado and M. Braga, “Secondary students’ modelling conceptualisation in situations related to particle dynamics: a clinical perspective,†Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 40, no. 13, pp. 1606–1628, 2018, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2018.1494394.

I. A. D. Astuti, I. Y. Putra, and Y. B. Bhakti, “Developing Practicum Module of Particle Dynamics Based on Scientific Methods to Improve Students’ Science Process Skills,†Sci. Educ., vol. 7, no. 2, p. 183, 2019, doi: 10.24235/sc.educatia.v7i2.2513.

E. R. Wulan, and H. A. Rusdiana, Evaluasi Pembelajaran, Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2014.

Z. Arifin, Evaluasi Pembelajaran: Prinsip, Teknik, Prosedur, Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2012.

Asrul, R. Ananda, and Rosnita, Evaluasi Pembelajaran, Bandung: Citapustaka Media, 2014.

J. Widiyanto, Evaluasi Pembelajaran: Konsep, Prinsip and Prosedur, Madiun: UNIPMA Press, 2018.

M. Fadilah, “The Relationship Analysis Between Discriminancy Power And Validity Of Item Testsâ€, Proceeding of International Conference On Research, Implementation and Education of Mathematics and Sciences, Yogyakarta State University, 18-20 May, pp. BE-63 – BE-68, 2014.

A. Zein, M. Fadillah, and R. Novianti, “Hubungan Antara Validitas Butir, Reliabilitas, Tingkat Kesukaran dan Daya Pembeda Soal Ujian Semester Genap Bidang Studi Biologi Kelas XI SMA/MA Negeri di Kota Padang Tahun Pelajaran 2010/2011â€, In: Prosiding Semirata (Seminar dan Rapat Tahunan) Bidang Ilmu MIPA, 10-12 Mei, Universitas Lampung, pp. 39-47, 2013.

Y. Abosalem, “Assessment Techniques and Students Higher-Order Thinking Skillsâ€, International Journal of Secondary Education, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1-11, 2016, doi: 10.11648/j.ijsedu.20160401.11.

M. D. Kusuma, U. Rosidin, Abdurrahman, and A. Suyatna, 2017. “The Development of Higher Order Thinking Skill (Hots) Instrument Assessment In Physics Studyâ€, IOSR Journal of Reasearch & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 26-32, 2017, doi: 10.9790/7388-070103XXXX.

M. H. Bassett, “Teaching Critical Thinking without (Much) Writing: Multipleâ€Choice and Metacognitionâ€, Teaching Theology & Religion, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 20-40, 2016, doi: 10.1111/teth.12318.

R. J. Shavelson, O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, K. Beck, S. Schmidt, and J. P. Marino, “Assessment of university students’ critical thinking: Next generation performance assessmentâ€, International Journal of Testing, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 337-362, 2019, doi: 10.1080/15305058.2018.1543309.

C. Aloisi, and A. Callaghan, “Threats to the validity of the collegiate learning assessment ( CLA + ) as a measure of critical thinking skills and implications for learning gainâ€, Higher Education Pedagogies, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 137–162, 2018, doi: 10.1080/23752696.2018.1449128.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-29

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 2 (2021): Oktober 2021

Section

Articles

License

COPYRIGHT TRANSFER FORM

The copyright to this article is transferred to Universitas Ahmad Dahlan (UAD) if and when the article is accepted for publication. The undersigned hereby transfers any and all rights in and to the paper including without limitation all copyrights to UAD. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment.

We declare that:

  1. This paper has not been published in the same form elsewhere.
  2. It will not be submitted anywhere else for publication prior to acceptance/rejection by this Journal.
  3. A copyright permission is obtained for materials published elsewhere and which require this permission for reproduction.

Furthermore, I/We hereby transfer the unlimited rights of publication of the above mentioned paper in whole to UAD. The copyright transfer covers the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, micro form, electronic form (offline, online) or any other reproductions of similar nature.

The corresponding author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors. This agreement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable. After submission of this agreement signed by the corresponding author, changes of authorship or in the order of the authors listed will not be accepted.

Retained Rights/Terms and Conditions

  1. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in the Work.
  2. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the Work or derivative works for the authors personal use or for company use, provided that the source and the UAD copyright notice are indicated, the copies are not used in any way that implies UAD endorsement of a product or service of any employer, and the copies themselves are not offered for sale.
  3. Although authors are permitted to re-use all or portions of the Work in other works, this does not include granting third-party requests for reprinting, republishing, or other types of re-use.