Efektivitas integrasi asesmen formatif concept checks pada pembelajaran fisika dalam meningkatkan kemampuan kognitif siswa SMA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/jrkpf.v7i2.17284Abstract
Abstrak. Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh hasil studi pendahuluan yang menunjukkan bahwa masih banyaknya pendidik yang menerapkan penilaian hanya untuk mengetahui hasil belajar siswa di akhir pembelajaran. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan suatu penilaian yang dapat meningkatkan pemahaman siswa selama pembelajaran yang dikenal dengan asesmen formatif. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menunjukkan efektivitas asesmen formatif concept checks dalam meningkatkan kemampuan kognitif siswa SMA. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah quasi experimental design dengan desain penelitian Nonequivalent Control Group Design. Sampel pada penelitian ini terdiri dari 59 siswa kelas X di salah satu SMA Negeri di kota Bandung. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui tes kemampuan kognitif yang dianalisis menggunakan uji t dan effect size. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa terdapat perbedaan peningkatan kemampuan kognitif siswa antara kelas eksperimen dengan kelas kontrol dan nilai effect size yang termasuk dalam kategori sedang. Secara keseluruhan Integrasi asesmen formatif concept checks pada pembelajaran fisika efektif terhadap peningkatan kemampuan kognitif siswa.
Kata kunci: Asesmen Formatif, Concept Checks, Kemampuan Kognitif
Abstract. This research is motivated by the result of a preliminary study, which shows that there are many educators who apply assessment only to find out the student learning outcomes at the end of learning. Therefore, an assessment is needed that can improve students' understanding during learning, known as a formative assessment. The purpose of this study is to know the effectiveness of formative concept checks on students' cognitive abilities. The research method was used a quasi-experimental design with one group pretest-posttest design. The sample in this study was class X students senior high school in Bandung, an amount of 59 students. The data collection was conducted through a cognitive abilities test. The data were analyzed using the t-test and effect size. The results showed that there was a difference in the increased cognitive ability of students between the experimental class and the control class and the effect size value included in the medium category. This shows that the integration of formative assessment concept checks in physics learning was effective in improving the cognitive abilities of students.
Keywords: Formative Assessment, Concept Checks, Cognitive AbilitiesReferences
Kemendikbud, Panduan Penilaian oleh Pendidik dan Satuan Pendidikan Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menen, 2017.
E. Gama and M. F. Barroso, “Student’s Video Production as Formative Assessment,†Sci. Educ., vol. 8, pp. 165–171, 2017, doi: 10.14712/18047106.740.
N. Bulunuz, M. Bulunuz, and H. Peker, “Effects of formative assessment probes integrated in extracurricular hands-on science: Middle school students’ understanding,†J. Balt. Sci. Educ., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 243–258, 2014.
Sriyati, “Peran Asesmen Formatif dalam Membentuk Habits of Mind Mahasiswa,†Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 2011.
E. W. N. Sofianto, W. Wartono, and S. Kusairi, “Pengaruh Balikan Formatif Terintergrasi Strategi Pembelajaran Diagram Vee Dan Kemampuan Awal Terhadap Penguasaan Konsep Siswa,†J. Pendidik. Fis. Indones., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 183–188, 2016, doi: 10.15294/jpfi.v12i2.4269.
S. Kusairi, “Analisis Asesmen Formatif Fisika Sma Berbantuan Komputer,†J. Penelit. dan Eval. Pendidik., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 68–87, 2013, doi: 10.21831/pep.v16i0.1106.
B. Kean, “Developing formative assessment strategies in the Primary Years Programme,†no. 2009, pp. 1–30, 2014.
R. E. Bennett, “Formative assessment: A critical review,†Assess. Educ. Princ. Policy Pract., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 5–25, 2011, doi: 10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678.
Y. Yin, M. K. Tomita, and R. J. Shavelson, “Using Formal Embedded Formative Assessments Aligned with a Short-Term Learning Progression to Promote Conceptual Change and Achievement in Science,†Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 531–552, 2014, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2013.787556.
C. Plybour, “Integrating formative assessment into physics instruction: The effect of formative vs. summative assessment on student physics learning and attitudes,†ProQuest Diss. Theses, p. 170, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1697283982?accountid=15272.
Arikunto, Dasar Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2012.
A. S. Ningrum, C. Ertikanto, and U. Rosidin, “Development of Formative Assessment Models bt Guided-Inquiry based to Foster Self-Regulation of Student High School,†vol. 6, pp. 100–116, 2018.
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta, 2015.
I. Etikan, “Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling,†Am. J. Theor. Appl. Stat., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 1, 2016, doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11.
C. J. Dunst, D. W. Hamby, and C. M. Trivette, “Guidelines for Calculating Effect Sizes for Practice-Based Research Syntheses,†Centerscope, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2004.
T. J. Sherman et al., “Effect of quiz format on student performance and answer-changing behaviour on formative assessments,†J. Biol. Educ., vol. 00, no. 00, pp. 1–15, 2019, doi: 10.1080/00219266.2019.1687106.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
COPYRIGHT TRANSFER FORM
The copyright to this article is transferred to Universitas Ahmad Dahlan (UAD) if and when the article is accepted for publication. The undersigned hereby transfers any and all rights in and to the paper including without limitation all copyrights to UAD. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment.
We declare that:
- This paper has not been published in the same form elsewhere.
- It will not be submitted anywhere else for publication prior to acceptance/rejection by this Journal.
- A copyright permission is obtained for materials published elsewhere and which require this permission for reproduction.
Furthermore, I/We hereby transfer the unlimited rights of publication of the above mentioned paper in whole to UAD. The copyright transfer covers the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, micro form, electronic form (offline, online) or any other reproductions of similar nature.
The corresponding author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors. This agreement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable. After submission of this agreement signed by the corresponding author, changes of authorship or in the order of the authors listed will not be accepted.
Retained Rights/Terms and Conditions
- Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in the Work.
- Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the Work or derivative works for the authors personal use or for company use, provided that the source and the UAD copyright notice are indicated, the copies are not used in any way that implies UAD endorsement of a product or service of any employer, and the copies themselves are not offered for sale.
- Although authors are permitted to re-use all or portions of the Work in other works, this does not include granting third-party requests for reprinting, republishing, or other types of re-use.
