Critical Study of Sociocultural Practice in Cattle Trading Arena

Authors

  • Sujarwa Sujarwa Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
  • Andrik Purwasito Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Sri Kusuma Habsari Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Titis Srimuda Pitana Universitas Sebelas Maret

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/channel.v9i2.21767

Keywords:

critical, discourse, sociocultural, style, register

Abstract

In the cattle trading arena, it is suspected that there is a peculiarity of registers as a style and rhetorical discourse of disguised communication as a form of tactics, which is not in line between linguistic aspects and sociocultural behavior. Register as a rhetorical style of communication is built, of course not without reason, but there is motivation, intention, and achievement of communication goals. This paper attempts to reveal: the form of registers in the rhetoric of communication in the cattle trading arena, the function of the register as communication rhetoric in the cattle trading arena, the symbolic meaning of registers in the rhetorical style and discourse of sociocultural practice in the cattle trading arena. A qualitative descriptive method is used to describe substantially the aspects of the meaning of the data with an in-depth analysis related to the subject matter. In order to achieve a profound interpretation, theoretical aids are needed: sociocultural, sociolinguistic, stylistic, capitalism, hegemony, discourse theory. In addition, hermeneutic theory as a strategic method for understanding texts must be interpreted for meaning. The results showed: the form of registers in the rhetoric of communication in the cattle trading arena in the form of oratorical, deliberative, consultative, casual, and intimate. The study concludes that the register functions as a conative and emotive tactic to influence, weaken, subdue, and restrain hegemony from creating an atmosphere of domination. The register applied in the rhetoric of communication in the cattle trading arena contains the symbolic meaning of feudalism relations in the form of phenomena of sociocultural practice events influenced by the discourse of tactics for capitalist cultural domination.

References

Alberico & Loisa. (2019). Retorika Deliberatif Selebgram dalam Motivasi Audiens Melalui Media Sosialâ€. Jurnal Koneksi. Vol.3.No.1 Juli. hlm.236-243.

Aminuddin. (1995). Pengantar Apresiasi Karya Sastra. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.

Badudu, Zain. (1994). Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Barker, Chris. (2011). Cultural Studies, Teori dan Praktik. (Terjemah:Nurhadi). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Black, James A. & Dean J. Champion. (1992). Metode dan Masalah Penelitian Sosial. Terjemah E.Koeswara, dkk. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Chaer, A. (2010). Kesantunan Berbahasa. Jakarta. Rineka Cipta.

Chaer, Abdul dan Leonie Agustina. (1995). Sosiolinguistik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Gayatri A/P Marimothu dan Rohaidah Kamaruddin (2018). Pemerolehan dan Penguasaan Leksikal Bahasa Melayu Kanak-Kanak India di Persekolahan. Pertanika Journal Mawangsa 5 (1): 413-421.

Harun Joko Prayitno (2009). Tindak Kesantunan Berbahasa Dalam Dialektika Pembelajaran Pragmatik: Berdaya, Berorientasi, dan Berstrategi Kesantunan Positifâ€. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Prasasti II. Kajian Pragmatik dalam Berbagai Bidang.

Hendrikus dalam Rajiyem (2005). Sejarah Perkembangan Retorika. Jurnal Humaniora, Vol. 17.No.2. hlm. 142-153.

Kandi, Umar (2017). Teori Kekuasaan Michel Foucault: Tantangan bagi Sosiologi Politik. Jurnal Al Khitabah. Vol. 3, No. 1 diunduh 1 Juni 2017, hlm. 118.

Keraf, Gorys. 1990. Diksi dan Gaya Bahasa. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Kutha Ratna, Nyoman. 2009. Paradigma Sosiologi Sastra. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Krisdimanto, Nanang (2014). Pierre Bourdieu, Sang Juru Damai. Kanal. Vol. 2. No. 2. Maret. hlm. 203.

Magnis Suseno, Frans. (2001). Pemikiran Karl Marx. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Moleong, Lexy J., 1991. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

Nababan, P.W.J. 1993. Sosiolinguistik: Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Ningeh, Martha.I. (2010). Retorika dan Penggunaannya dalam Berbagai Bidang. Jurnal Persisi, Vol.6, No,12, Juli – Desember. hlm. 61.

Patria, Nezar & Andi Arif. (2015). Antonio Gramsci, Negara dan Hegemoni. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

R. Kunjana Rahardi, (2017). Manifestasi Fenomena Ketidaksantunan Prakmatik Berbahasa Berasaskan Budaya Indonesia. Journals Pertanika, Mahawangsa 4 (1):147-166.

Ritzer, George & Douglas J.Goodman. Tterjemahan Nurhadi. (2009). Teori Sosiologi dari Sosiologi Klasik sampai Perkembangan Mutakhir Teori Sosial Postmodern. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Soekanto, Soerjono. (1990). Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Soeparno. (2018). Dasar-Dasar Linguistik Umum. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

Skeggs, Beverley. (2013). Perasaan Kelas (Sosial): Afeksasi dan Budaya dalam Penciptaan Relasi Kelas (sosial), dalam The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Sosiologi.Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Sulistyarini, Dhanik, et. al. (2020). Buku Ajar Retorika. Serang Banten: A.A.Rizky.

Sutopo, H.B. (2006). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Dasar-Dasar Teori dan Terapannya dalam Penelitian. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Sutrisno & Ida Wiendijarti (2014). Kajian Retorika Untuk pengembangan Berpidato. Jurnal Komunikasi. Vol.12.No. 1, Januari – April 2014. hlm.70-84.

Suwito. (1985). Sosiolinguistik Pengantar Awal. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret.

______. (1983). Pengantar Awal Sosiolinguistik, Teori dan Problema. Surakarta: Henary Offset.

Wuwur Dori Hendrikus. (2017). Retorika Terampil Berpidato, Berdiskusi, Berargumen, Bernegosiasi. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-15

Issue

Section

Articles