Correlation Analysis of Interpersonal Communication Competence of Corporate Social Responsibility Facilitators, Stakeholder Trust Level, and Corporate Reputation

Authors

  • Retno Wulandari PT Indonesia Power Semarang PGU
  • Agus Naryoso Universitas Diponegoro
  • Arifa Rachma Febriyani Universitas Diponegoro
  • Siti Ahmaniyar Universitas Diponegoro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/channel.v9i1.18071

Keywords:

PT. Indonesia Power Semarang PGU Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), interpersonal communication, competence

Abstract

The problem of communication such as misunderstanding, there is no feedback, and the ineffectiveness of a message often occurs while the company communicates or interacts with stakeholders, moreover runs the CSR program. The communication problems above affected one of the CSR goals. CSR can improve people living in the region around the company like happened in the District of North Semarang because it has the highest poverty rate in Semarang city. Not achieving the CSR objectives will because residents who live around the company have poor judgments against the company and have no trust against the company and so, causes a poor reputation against the company. Moreover, if the company has excessive gas emission and one of them is PT. Indonesia Power Semarang PGU. The research has the purpose of determining if there is a relationship between the effectiveness of interpersonal communication done by the facilitator of CSR and the level of trust beneficiaries with the reputation company of PT. Indonesia Power Semarang PGU. This research is a quantitative research using the theory of communication effectiveness and reasoned action (TRA). Sample this research is Group guidance of PT. Indonesia Power Semarang PGU is the Joint Business Group (KUB) Prima Indosutera in the District of North Semarang. Based on the research results, the effectiveness of interpersonal communication and trust beneficiaries’ level significantly relates to its reputation. The things above showed through the significance value of the hypothesis test performed, more effectively the communication interpersonal has done so. The company’s reputation is better (positive) than such a hypothesis has a significance value of 0.000 (0.000 s of 0.01). 

Author Biographies

Retno Wulandari, PT Indonesia Power Semarang PGU

Ahli Muda Community Development PT Indonesia Power Semarang PGU

Agus Naryoso, Universitas Diponegoro

Departemen Ilmu Komunikasi FISIP Universitas Diponegoro

Arifa Rachma Febriyani, Universitas Diponegoro

Prodi D4 Informasi dan Humas Sekolah Vokasi Universitas Diponegoro

Siti Ahmaniyar, Universitas Diponegoro

Departemen Ilmu Komunikasi FISIP Universitas Diponegoro

References

Amaladoss, Martin Xavier & Manohar, Hansa Lysander. (2013). Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility – A Case of CSR Communication in Emerging Economies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2). pages 65-80, March. DOI: 10.1002/csr.287

Baalbaki, Sally & Guzmán, Francisco. (2016). A consumer-perceived consumer-based brand equity scale. Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(3). pages 229-251, May. DOI: 10.1057/bm.2016.11

Bouckaert, G., Walle, S. Van De. 2003. Quality of Public Service Delivery and Trust in Government. In Governing Networks: EGPA Yearbook (pp. 299–318).

Brown, T., Yu, M., & Etherington, J. (2020). Are Listening and Interpersonal Communication Skills Predictive of Professionalism in Undergraduate Occupational Therapy Students? Health Professions Education. 6(2). 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2020.01.001

Carroll, A.B. and Shabana, K.M. (2010). The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research, and Practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12: 85-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00275.

Cowan, Kristen & Guzman, Fancisco. (2020). How CSR reputation, sustainability signals, and country-of-origin sustainability reputation contribute to corporate brand performance: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Research Volume 117, September 2020, Pages 683-693 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.017

David, Prabu, Kline, Kline & Dai, Yang. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility Practices, Corporate Identity, and Purchase Intention: A Dual-Process Model. Journal of Public Relations Research, 17:3, 291-313, DOI: 10.1207/s1532754xjprr1703_4

Devito, J. A. (2012). The Interpersonal Communication Book (13th edition). Pearson.

Dimitrova, Y. (2019). Communication on Corporate Social Responsibility and Management of Responsible Corporate Reputation. January.

Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic ï¬ndings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4). 611–628

Fombrun, C.J. (1996). Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

Fombrun, C.J. (2005). Building Corporate Reputation through CSR Initiatives: Evolving Standards. Corporate Reputation Review, 8, 7-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540235

Fombrun, C.J. (2012). The Building Blocks of Corporate Reputation: Definitions, Antecedents, Consequences. The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Reputation Edited by Timothy G. Pollock and Michael L. Barnett DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199596706.013.0005

Gauzente, C. and Fenneteau, H. (2006). Éthique et responsabilité sociale. Que peut-on attendre du marketing ? in Rosé, J.-J. (Ed.). Responsabilité sociale de l'entreprise. Pour un nouveau contrat social, Bruxelles, De Boeck, 77–92.

Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program SPSS. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Glaveli, N. (2020). Corporate Social Responsibility Toward Stakeholders And Customer Loyalty: Investigating The Roles Of Trust And Customer Identification With The Company. Social Responsibility Journal, December 2019. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-07-2019-0257

Goodsell, C. T. (2006). A New Vision For Public Administration. Public Administration Review. 66(4). 623–635.

Golob, Ursa & Podnar, Klement. (2014). Critical Points Of Csr-related Stakeholder Dialogue In Practice. Business Ethics: A European Review. 23. 10.1111/beer.12049.

Heinberg, Martin & Ozkaya, H. Erkan & Taube, Markus. (2018). Do Corporate Image And Reputation Drive Brand Equity In India And China? - Similarities And Differences. Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C). pages 259-268. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.09.018

Hong, Soo & Yang, Sung-Un & Rim, Hyejoon. (2010). The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility and Customer–company Identification on Publics’ Dialogic Communication Intentions. Public Relations Review. 36. 196-198. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.10.005.

Keputusan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Republik Indonesia pada hasil Penilaian Peringkat Kinerja Perusahaan (PROPER) dalam Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup tahun 2018-2019 (https://proper.menlhk.go.id/propercms/uploads/magazine/docs/sk/sk-menlhk-nomor-1049-tahun-2019-lengkap.pdf) diakses pada 11 September 2020

Kim, S. (2018). The Process of CSR Communication—Culture-Specific or Universal? Focusing on Mainland China and Hong Kong Consumers. International Journal of Business Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488418805523

Kriyantono, R. (2015). Public Relations and Corporate Social Responsibility in Mandatory Approach Era in Indonesia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211(June). 320–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.041

Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2010). Theories of Human Communication. Long Grove: Waveland Press.

Mahmudi. (2005). Manajemen Kinerja Sektor Publik. UPP AMP YKPN.

Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business. Administrative Science Quarterly. 48(2). 268–305. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556659

MacKenzie, S., Podsakoff, P., & Fetter, R. (1993). The Impact of Organizational Citizenship Behavior on Evaluations of Salesperson Performance. Journal of Marketing, 57(1). 70-80. doi:10.2307/1252058

Mukasa, K. D., Kim, K., Korea, S., Lim, H., & Korea, S. (2015). How Do Corporate Social Responsibility? 31(2). 383–396.

Mulyana, D. (2008). Ilmu Komunikasi: Suatu Pengantar. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Park, Young Eun & Dodd, Melissa. (2016). The Historical Development of Corporate Social Responsibility as a Strategic Function of Public Relations. 10.4324/9781315646503-1.

Park, Y. E., & Kang, M. (2020). When crowdsourcing in CSR leads to dialogic communication: The effects of trust and distrust. Public Relations Review. 46(1). 101867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101867

Pope, BB, Rodzen L, Spross G. (2008). Raising the SBAR: How Better Communication Improves Patient Outcomes. Nursing. Mar;38(3):41-3. doi: 10.1097/01.NURSE.0000312625.74434.e8. PMID: 18418180.

Pham, H. S. T., & Tran, H. T. (2020). Csr Disclosure And Firm Performance: The Mediating Role Of Corporate Reputation And Moderating Role Of Ceo Integrity. Journal of Business Research, 120(August). 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.002

Rasyid, A., Saleh, A., Cangara, H., & Priatna, W. B. (2019). Jurnal 23 - Pemberdayaan Masy. 31(2). 507–518.

Retnaningsih, H. (2015). Permasalahan Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) dalam Rangka Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Aspirasi. 6(2). 177–188. https://jurnal.dpr.go.id/index.php/aspirasi/article/view/512

Rim, H., Park, Y. E., & Song, D. (2020). Watch Out When Expectancy Is Violated: An Experiment Of Inconsistent Csr Message Cueing. Journal of Marketing Communications, 26(4). 343-361. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2018.1523216

Salim, Mufid. (2018). Improving Organizational Attractiveness in Job Choice by Communicating CSR Practices. Jurnal Komunikasi ISKI. Vol. 03 (02). 2018. 76-83 https://doi.org/10.25008/jkiski.v3i2.226

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Suhardi, G. (2005). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kepercayaan Dan Loyalitas Nasabah Perbankan Di Surabaya. Business and Economics. 9(2). 1–11.

Sujarweni, V. W. (2014). Metode Penelitian: Lengkap, Praktis, dan Mudah Dipahami. Pustaka Baru Press.

Statistik Data Terpadu Kesejahteraan Sosial (DTKS) Dinas Sosial Kota Semarang

(http://dinsos.semarangkota.go.id/statistik/index) diakses pada 11 September 2020

Swaen, V., Demoulin, N., & Pauwels-Delassus, V. (2020). Impact Of Customers’ Perceptions Regarding Corporate Social Responsibility And Irresponsibility In The Grocery Retailing Industry: The Role Of Corporate Reputation. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.016

Syahriani, D., & Siwi, M. (2018). Hubungan Komunikasi Corporate Social Responsibility Dengan Reputasi Perusahaan, 16(1). 54–74. https://doi.org/10.29244/jurnalkmp.16.1.54-74

Taghian, M., D’Souza, C., & Polonsky, M. J. (2015). A Stakeholder Approach To Corporate Social Responsibility, Reputation, And Business Performance. Social Responsibility Journal. 11(2). 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-06-2012-0068

Warta, W. (2017). Manajemen Reputasi. Simbiosa Rekatama Media.

Yadav, R. S., Dash, S. S., Chakraborty, S., & Kumar, M. (2018). Perceived CSR and Corporate Reputation: The Mediating Role of Employee Trust. Vikalpa. 43(3). 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090918794823

Downloads

Published

2021-04-16

Issue

Section

Articles