Qualifying Teachers’ of English for Specific Purposes to Meet the Global Challenges

Authors

  • Paulus Widiatmoko Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Andreas Winardi Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26555/adjes.v5i1.8892

Keywords:

ESP teaching, global challenges, teacher competence

Abstract

As institutions of higher education prepare graduates to strive for the more competitive job market, teachers of English for Specific Purposes (ESP) play a pivotal role to nurture and facilitate students’ English competence for career advancement. It is commonly hypothesized that ESP teachers require more than that of general English instructors are capable of in language teaching-related pedagogy. However, limited numbers of such studies have been conducted in Indonesia as a potentially developing country in the world. This quantitative study aims to portray ESP teachers' perceived qualifications, benefits of the program instruction, and its relevance to meet the challenges of the globalization. Initial findings of this study reveal that almost all of the respondents acknowledged the necessity of ESP teachers to demonstrate capacity in educational principle, language learning theory, Linguistics competence, material and media design, classroom management, intercultural understanding, language assessment, and classroom-based research inquiry. It is perceived that successful ESP teaching is significantly required for graduates to excel the job market, increase professionalism at work, and facilitate the nation competitive edge. Furthermore, ESP programs are considered relevant to meet the present and future challenges of globalization. More elaborative findings will be obtained, specifically addressing difference-variance of perceptions according to respondents’ education background and teaching experience.

References

Basturkmen, H. (2010). Developing courses in English for specific purposes. New York: Springer.

Carver, D. (1983). Some propositions about ESP. The ESP Journal, 2(2), 131–137.

Dudley-Evans, T., & John, M. S. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ellis, R. (2012). Language teaching research and language pedagogy. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.

Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Long, M. (1991). A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. De Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.). Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Piasecka, L. (2011). Sensitizing foreign language learners to cultural diversity through developing intercultural communicative competence. In Aspects of culture in second language acquisition and foreign language learning (pp. 21–33). Berlin: Springer.

Renandya, W. (2011). “Teacher, the tape is too fast!â€Extensive listening in ELT. ELT Journal, 65(1), 52-59.

Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. Springer Berlin Heidelberg., 15, 165–179.

Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.). Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 97-114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook on research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471–483). New York and London: Routledge

Downloads

Published

2018-03-31

Issue

Section

Articles