Linguistic analysis of Philippine crime news broadcasts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26555/adjes.v8i2.21694Keywords:
linguistic analysis, media discourse, linguistics, crime news, Philippine broadcastAbstract
News stories on negative phenomena such as crime news can stir diverse angles of reality which result in diverse forms of behaviors. This study examined the linguistic devices and discourse strategies employed by the Filipino Journalists in constructing crime news broadcasts. The Linguistic Analysis (LA) framework using the lens of Ilya Romanovich Galperin and van Dijk's Socio-Cognitive Model were used; in which 25 mainstream crime news broadcasted in the Philippine TV from January to May 2015 were collected and transcribed. The findings revealed that phonetic devices such as alliteration, cacophony, assonance, rhyme and onomatopoeia were present in the corpus; lexical devices like epithet, metonymy, epigram, pleonasm, personification, and zeugma; and, syntactical devices such as enumeration, gap-sentence-link, asyndeton, rhetorical questions were mostly demonstrated in the sentences of the research corpora. Moreover, Filipino Journalists had utilized strategies such as, use of figures and statistics, metaphorization; authoritarianism; blame transfer; dysphemism; positive-self and negative-other; and source avoidance strategy. These devices and strategies made most of the statements contextual and implied. In addition, it was also revealed in the analyses that Philippine dialectical terms and neologisms were evident strategies used by the Filipino Journalist in assisting audiences to better appreciate, comprehend and discover the truth in news broadcasting.
References
Akmajian, A., & Demers, R. A. (2010). Linguistics: an introduction to language and communication (6th Edition). MIT Press.
Alo, M. & Ogungbe, E.O. (2012). Lexicalization in news stories of some Nigerian national newspapers. Lumina Press.
Battaglia, M. (2018). Study of rare sampling of the b quark with the DELPHI detector at LEP. Helsinki: Yliopistopaino.
Bazerman, C. (2014). Intertextuality: How texts rely on other texts. What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices, 83-96. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bell, A. (1995.). Language in the Media (1st ed., Vol. 22, Ser. 1). London: Routledge.
Blace, N. (2014). Study on good governance in General Santos City. Unpublished Research, General Santos City Police Office XII.
Bortner, M. A. (1984). Media images and public attitudes toward crime and justice. Justice and the media: Issues and research, 15-30
Chiluwa, I. E. & Blench, N. (2016). A critical study of language variation and ideological differences in media discourse in Nigeria. Ibadan Journal of English Studies, 87-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.18523/journal.v3i7.292
Chuang, C. L. (2012). Metaphor and Metonymy in Apple Daily's Headlines.ROCKING XXIV (2012), 176. Paper presented during the 24th Conference on Computational Linguistics and Speech Processing. Retrieved from
https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/O12-1018.pdf
Collin, E. (2012). Film Criticism in the Digital Age edited by Mattias Frey, Cecilia Sayad. Rutgers University Press.
Corr, M, (2013). Evolutionary Linguistics. Annual Review of Anthropology (Annual Reviews)
Croft, W. (2008). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Croft, W. (2018). Evolutionary linguistics. Annual Review of Anthropology,37(1), 219.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085156
Crystal, D. (1969). An encyclopedia dictionary of language. Oxford Blackwell Publishers Linguistics. Penguin Books. ISBN 9780140135312.
Dijk, T. A. (1955). Discourse and communication: New approaches to the analysis of mass media discourse and communication. Berlin: W. de Gruyter.
Dowler, Kenneth. (2003). Media consumption and public attitudes toward crime and justice: The relationship between fear of crime, punitive attitudes, and perceived police effectiveness. Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture. 10. 109-126.
Fowler, R. (1991). Linguistic Criticism (2nd ed.). Oxford: OUP.
Galacgac, C. & Viray, K. (2013). Stylistic Analysis on the Editorial Coverage of Maguindanao Massacre. Unpublished Thesis. University of Southeastern Philippines.
Galperin, I. R. (1977). Stylistics. Moscow: "Higher School". Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/34733554/DBE_Galperin_i_r_Stylistics [on 11 November 2015]
Hollander, L. (2013). Litotes in Old Norse. PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 53(1), 1-33. doi:10.2307/458399
Houston, K (2013). Shady Characters: The Secret Life of Punctuation, Symbols & Other Typographical Marks. New York & London: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.
Lavrakas, P. J. (2018). Encyclopedia of survey research methods. Sage Publications. DOI: Encyclopedia of Survey Research Method
Lippmann, D.N, et al (2002). Closing the gap: Addressing the vocabulary needs of English-language learners in bilingual and mainstream classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 2, pp. 188-215. https://doi/10.1111/j.10.1598/RRQ.39.2.3
Lippmann, W. (1995). Public opinion. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
Lyndon, R. (2012). The Language Identification Problem: Formant Analysis and Cross-Linguistic Uniqueness. Western Papers in Linguistics. Retrieved from: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wpl_clw/vol3/iss1/5
Marsh, H. L. (1991). A comparative analysis of crime coverage in newspapers in the United States and other countries from 1960–1989: A review of the literature. Journal of Criminal Justice, 19(1), 67-79.
Sacco V.F. (1995). Media Constructions of Crime. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 1995;539(1):141-154. https://doi:10.1177/0002716295539001011
Sheley, J. F., & Ashkins, C. D. (1981). Crime, crime news, and crime views. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45(4), 492-506.
Smith, N. (2010). Acquiring phonology: A cross-generational case study. In the series Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 124. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. xvii 265. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne De Linguistique, 59(2), 279-281. http://doi:10.1017/S0008413100000293
The astadhyayi of Panini. Motilal Banarsidass Publ., 1996 (2 Vols.). Vedic Books.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in Ahmad Dahlan Journal of English Studies (ADJES) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Ahmad Dahlan Journal of English Studies (ADJES) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in Ahmad Dahlan Journal of English Studies (ADJES).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Ahmad Dahlan Journal of English Studies (ADJES).
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).