Investigating Aspects Affecting Joe Biden's Speech on the Inauguration of the 46th President of The United States: A Political Discourse Analysis

Authors

  • Yunika Triana Institut Agama Islam Negeri Surakarta
  • Dewi Zulaiha Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26555/adjes.v8i2.19956

Keywords:

political discourse analysis, interpretation, speech act

Abstract

This paper aims to discover the aspects behind the politic historical events of Joe Biden's state speech. The speech, of course, has close relation with some of the historic American events that had just occurred. The research uses political discourse analysis to find the points uttered by the president who was influenced by ideology, status, and various socio-political contexts. At the inauguration on January 21, 2021, President Joe Biden's first national address is interesting to review. He conveyed messages explicitly to American society, but he also conveyed messages implicitly to political opponents. Researchers found some factors why messages spoken by Joe Biden including addressee, contextual situation, the intention of the utterance, speech act, and verbal act. These are the concerns by researchers as to whom the speech was delivered. It is not only aimed at directing the American society; it was also directed at his political rivals.

References

Ahmed, H. R., & Amir, S. (2021). Speech Act Analysis of the Joseph R . Biden , Jr.'s Inaugural Address on 20th of January 2021 as the 46th President of the USA. Electronic Research Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(February), 43-55.

Akinkurolere, S. (2019). Exploring the Significance of Context in Meaning: Speech Act Features of Performative Political-Speeches of President Umaru Musa Yar'adua. Athens Journal of Humanities & Arts, 7(1), 65-84. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajha.7-1-3

Alathari, L., Drysdale, D., Carlock, A., Cotkin, A., Johnston, B., Driscoll, S., Mauldin, D., McGarry, J., Nemet, J., & Vineyard, N. (2021). Averting Targeted School Violence.

Austin, J. L. (2011). How To Do Things With Words. In How To Do Things With Words. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001

Bauer, L., Broady, K., Edelberg, W., & Donnell, J. O. (2020). Ten Facts about COVID-19 and the U . S . Economy. The Hamilton Project, Brookings Papers, September.

Beckley, M. (2018). The power of nations: Measuring what matters. International Security. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00328

Blake, A. (2021). 4 takeaways from Joe Biden's inaugural address. Washington. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/01/20/takeaway-biden-harris-inauguration/.

Darong, H. C. (2021). Interpersonal Function of Joe Biden's Victory Speech ( Systemic Functional Linguistics View ). Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 5(1), 57-66.

Dunmire, P. L. (2018). Political Discourse Analysis: Exploring the Language of Politics and the Politics of Language Political Discourse Analysis: Exploring the Language of Politics and the Politics of Language. July. https://doi.org/10.1002/lnc3.365

Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis. In The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203809068-8

Gee, J. P. (2001). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. In An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315835884

Healy, J. (2021). These Are the 5 People Who Died in the Capitol Riot. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/11/us/who-died-in-capitol-building-attack.html

Indrawati. (2009). Context in Pragmatics. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 3(2), 23-31. https://doi.org/10.15294/lc.v3i2.916

Kameswari, L., & Mamidi, R. (2018). Political discourse analysis: a case study of 2014 andhra pradesh state assembly election of interpersonal speech choices. Proceedings of the 32nd Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, PACLIC 2018, December, 239-246.

Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics (First Edit). Longman Group Limited.

Levinson, S. C. (1980). Survey Article: Speech Act Theory: The State of the Art. In Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800008661

Lindayana, L., Arifuddin, A., & Mandala, H. (2018). Politeness of Verbal and Non-Verbal Directive Speech Acts in the Tenth Grade Students Learning Process of Negeri 1 Mataram. RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 4(1), 70-74. https://doi.org/10.22225/jr.4.1.526.70-74

Luke, A. (2002). Beyond Science and Ideology Critique: Developments in Critical Discourse Analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190502000053

Rachman, A., Yunianti, S., & Ratnadewi, D. (2017). Critical Discourse Analysis in Donald Trump Presidential Campaign To Win Americans Heart. TELL Journal, 5(2), 8-17.

Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/doi:10.1017/CBO9780511609213

Shalihah, M. (2019). A Pragmatic Analysis on The Types and The Purposes of Address Terms Used by the Main Character in Jane Austen's EMMA . EnJourMe (English Journal of Merdeka): Culture, Language, and Teaching of English, 3(2), 52-60. https://doi.org/10.26905/enjourme.v2i2.2747

Susanto, D. (2014). The Pragmatic Meanings of Address Terms Sampeyan and Anda. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 140-155. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v4i1.606

Tiersma, P., & Geis, M. L. (1998). Speech Acts and Conversational Interaction. Language. https://doi.org/10.2307/417570

Triana, Y., Sari, I. F., & Apriyanto, S. (2020). Language Features and Causes of Suicide Case from Forensic Linguistics Point of View. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(6). https://www.psychosocial.com/article/PR260803/19450/

Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is Political Discourse Analysis? Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 11, 11-52. https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.11.03dij

Waisanen, D. J., & Becker, A. B. (2015). The Problem with Being Joe Biden: Political Comedy and Circulating Personae The Problem with Being Joe Biden: Political Comedy and Circulating Personae. September. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2015.1057516

Wall, J. D., Stahl, B. C., & Salam, A. F. (2015). Critical discourse analysis as a review methodology: An empirical example. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37, 257-285. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.03711

Official Data Source

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q5iCPKDp4V4

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/01/20/takeaway-biden-harris-inauguration/

https://www.whitehouse.gov/about-the-white-house/our-government/the-executive-branch/

https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/united-states/

Downloads

Published

2021-10-04

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 2 (2021): September

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish in Ahmad Dahlan Journal of English Studies (ADJES) agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the Ahmad Dahlan Journal of English Studies (ADJES) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in Ahmad Dahlan Journal of English Studies (ADJES).
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Ahmad Dahlan Journal of English Studies (ADJES).
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).