Developing ESP Learners Vocabulary Learning by Contextualization of the FonF Practice Model in CALL Context

shiva soltani, Ahmad Mohseni

Abstract


The FonF practice model (focus on form) as a technology-oriented pedagogical model was contextualized to examine its efficacy on the second language (L2) learners' intentional and incidental vocabulary learning in computer-assisted language learning (CALL)as an attempt to integrate the emerging educational technologies into L2 learning. To this end, a sample of 55 medical ESP learners participated in a mixed methods research study that administered the FonF practice model-based treatment as the educational intervention among the experimental group. The findings confirmed the efficacy of the FonF practice model in developing incidental and intentional vocabulary learning among the participants who used technology-based tools at form, meaning, and communication levels. Theoretically, the main implication is the need to address individual differences in general and nonlinearity and dynamicity of motivation in particular. Pedagogically, L2 teachers are suggested to benefit from reported CALL tools to boost incidental and intentional vocabulary learning for ESP purposes.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Arora, A., Evans, S., Gardner, C., Gulbrandsen, K, & Riley, J. E.(2015). Strategies for success: Using formative assessment to build skills and community in the blended classroom. In S. Koç,X. Liu, & P. Wachira (Eds.), Assessment in online and blended learning environments (pp. 235–251). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Bahari, A. (2021a). Challenges and affordances of developing receptive and productive skills via technology-based instruction. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal (CALL-EJ), 22(1), 25-55.

Bahari, A. (2021b). Computer-assisted language proficiency assessment tools and strategies. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 35(2), 34–59.doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2020.1726738

Bahari, A. (2020a). Game-based collaborative vocabulary learning in blended and distance L2 learning. The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 35(3), 1–22.doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2020.1814229.

Bahari, A. (2020b). CANDA: Computer-assisted nonlinear dynamic approach for the L2 teaching in blended and distance learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(6), 1–15.doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1805774.

Bahari, A. (2020c). Computer-mediated feedback for L2 learners: Challenges vs. affordances. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, doi:10.1111/jcal.12481.

Bahari, A. (2019a). FonF practice model from theory to practice: CALL via focus on form approach and nonlinear dynamic motivation to develop listening and speaking proficiency. Computers & Education, 130(3), 40–58. doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.009.

Bahari, A. (2019b). The impact of applying FonF practice model on developing L2 listening and speaking with a focus on intentional and incidental vocabulary acquisition in CALL context. Revistade Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, 14, 45–57.doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2019.10785

Bahari, A. (2018). Sacred text motivation for general l2 learners: a mixed methods study. Journal of Academic Ethics,16(4), 1–31. doi.org/10.1007/s10805-018-9316–3

Bygate, M. & Samuda, V. (2005). Integrative planning through the use of task repetition. In R. Ellis (Eds) Planning and task performance in a second language. Amsterdam/New York: Benjamins.

Chang, M. M. (2005). Applying self-regulated learning strategies in a web-based instruction: An investigation of motivation perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(3), 217–230.doi.org/10.1080/09588220500178939

Chiu, Y. H. (2013). Computer-assisted second language vocabulary instruction: A metaanalysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), E52–E56.

Clifford, R. & Granoien, N. (2008). Application of technology to language acquisition processes: What can work and why. In M. V. Holland & F. P. Fisher (Eds.),The path of speech technologies in computer assisted language learning: From research to practice (pp. 25–43). London, England: Routledge Language Learning.

Colpaert, J. (2018). Exploration of affordances of open data for language learning and teaching. Journal of Technology and Chinese Language Teaching, 9(1), 1–14.

Dashtestani, R. (2015). Examining the use of web-based tests for testing academic vocabulary in EAP instruction. Teaching English with Technology, 15(1), 48–61.

de Bot, K. (2008). Introduction: Second language development as a dynamic process. The Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 166–178.

DeKeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42–63). Cambridge: CUP.

Dörnyei, Z. &Ottó, I. (1998). Motivation in action: A process model of L2 motivation. Working Papers in Applied Linguistics (Thames Valley University, London), 4, 43–69.

Dumova, T. (2012). The usability of online quizzes: Evaluating student perceptions. In S. Kelsey, & K. St. Amant (Eds.), Computer mediated communication: Issues and approaches in education (pp. 50–61). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

Ellis, R. (2016). Focus on form: A critical review. Language Teaching Research 20 (3), 405–428.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.

Ivey, G. (1999). A multicase study in the middle school: Complexities among young adolescent readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 172–192.

Larsen-Freeman, D. & Cameron, L. (2008). Research methodology on language development from a complex systems perspective. Modern Language Journal, 92, 200–13.

Laufer, B. (2006). Comparing focus on form and focus on forms in second-language vocabulary learning. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 149–166.

Long, M. (2000). Focus on form in task-based language teaching. In Language Policy and Pedagogy, edited by R. H. Lambert and E. Shohamy, 179–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Lu, H. L. (2009). Pre-class online quizzing as a catalyst for pedagogical change. SOTL Commons Conference. Paper 56.

Macaro, E., Graham, S., & Vanderplank, R. (2007). A review of listening strategies: Focus on sources of knowledge and on success. In A. D. Cohen & E. Macaro (Eds.), Language learner strategies: 30 years of research and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 165–185.

Nassaji, H. (2004). The relationship between depth of vocabulary knowledge and L2 learners’ lexical inferencing strategy use and success. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 61, 107–134.

Nassaji, H. (2016). Anniversary article: Interactional feedback in second language teaching and learning: A synthesis and analysis of current research. Language Teaching Research 20(4), 535–562.

Nassaji, H. &Fotos, S. (2011). Teaching grammar in second language classrooms: Integrating form focuse dinstruction in communicative context. New York: Taylor & Francis.

Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528.

Pawlak, M. (2006). The place of form focused instruction in the foreign language classroom. Kalisz-Poznan´: Wydawnictwo WPA UAM.

Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Shapiro, J., & Whitney, P. (1997). Factors involved in the leisure reading of upper elementary school students. Reading Psychology, 18, 343–370.

Sheen, R. (2002). Focus on form and focus on forms. ELT journal, 56(3), 303–305.

Tsou, W., Wang, W., &Tzeng, Y. (2006). Applying a multimedia storytelling website in foreign language learning. Computers & Education, 47(1), 17–28.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.

Vidal, K. (2003). Academic listening: A source of vocabulary acquisition? Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 56–86.

Vidal, K. (2011). A comparison of the effects of reading and listening on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 61(1), 219-258. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00593.x

VanPatten, B. (2004). Input and output in establishing form-meaning connections. In B. VanPatten, J. Williams, & S. Rott (Eds.), Form-meaning connections in secondlanguage acquisition (pp. 29–48). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Volume 4: The history of the development of higher mental functions (R. W. Rieber, Eds.). New York, NY: Plenum Press.

Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J.T. (1997). Relations of children’s motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 420–432.

Wilson, A., Hainey, T. & Connolly, T. M. (2013). Using scratch with primary school children: an evaluation of games constructed to gauge understanding of programming concepts. International Journal of Games-Based Learning, 3(1), 25–41.

Winke, P., Gass, S., & Sydorenko, T. (2013). Factors influencing the use of captions by foreign language learners: An eye-tracking study. The Modern Language Journal, 97(1), 254–75.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12928/jehcp.v10i1.18897

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL, HEALTH, COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY
Program Pascasarjana Magister Psikologi
Universitas Ahmad Dahlan Yogyakarta
Penerbit UAD Press

ISSN Printed 2088-3129 ISSN Online 2460 8467
EMAIL: jehcp@psy.uad.ac.id
 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats