Utang dan Pengakhiran Perjanjian Secarap Sepihak (Studi Kasus Perjanjian Konsultan PT. Garuda dan PT. Magnus

Awalia Noviyanti, Mukti Fajar Nur Dewanto

Abstract


This article aims to analyze the existence of the debt in reciprocal agreement between PT. Garuda and PT. Magnus, and about the termination of agreement which set aside article 1266 Civil Law unilaterally whether could cancel debt payment obligation or not. This research is normative research which observes the data that correlated to agreement, debt, act againts the law, and termination of agreement which set aside the article 1266 Civil Law. The approach of this article is statute approach which review the data that have correlation with law of agreement and termination of agreement, and case approach. It is the case of PT. Garuda and PT. Magnus. The data collection was done by library research that observing the data about law of agreement and termination of agreement. The result of research shows that there must be approval from each party in reciprocal agreement. Thus, the debt of PT. Garuda to PT. Magnus is the obligation that must be fulfilled due to PT. Magnus has worked maximally to complete its obligation. In other side, the termination of law which set aside article 1266 Civil Law is act againts the law, therefore the obligation to pay the debt must be done, in the reason of there is indemnification in act againts the law.

Keywords


Debt Agreement; Act Against the Law; Indonesian Civil Law

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. Buku

Hernoko, Agus Yudha (2008). Hukum Perjanjian Asas Proporsionalitas Dalam Kontrak Komersial. Yogyakarta: LaksBang Mediatama.

Mahmudji, Sri, dan Soerjono Soekanto (2011). Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Muhammad, Abdul Kadir (1980). Hukum Perjanjian. Bandung: Alumni.

Dewata, Mukti Fajar Nur dan Achmad, Yulianto (2010). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Sjahdeini dan Remy, Sutan (2002). Hukum Kepailitan Memahami Faillissementsverordening Juncto Undang-Undang No. 4 Tahun 1998. Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti.

Suryono, Leli Joko (2014). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perjanjian Indonesia. Yogyakarta: LP3M UMY.

Syaifudin, Muhammad (2012). Hukum Kontrak. Memahami Kontrak dalam Perspektif Filsafat Teori Dogmatik dan Praktik Hukum. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

B. Jurnal

Yuanita, Eva (2006) Analisis terhadap putusan pengadilan Niaga Atas Penolakan Permohonan Pernyataan Pailit yang Diajukan Oleh PT. Magnus Indonesia terhadap PT. Garuda Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 36(3).

C. Putusan Pengadilan

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 05/K/N/2006

Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Pusat Nomor: 10/Pailit/2005/PN.Niaga/Jkt.Pst.

D. Internet

http://finance.detik.com/berita-ekonomi-bisnis/521183/garuda-indonesia-digugat-pailit. (Diunduh pada Kamis, 05 Januari 2017, pukul 22.06 wib)

https://finance.detik.com/berita-ekonomi-bisnis/d-524362/dirut-garuda-itu-masalah-simpel (Diunduh pada Minggu, 08 Januari 2017, pukul 14.38 wib)




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v9i1.a9223

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Hukum Novelty

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Hukum Novelty

ISSN (Print): 1412-6834

ISSN (Online): 2550-0090

Creative Commons License
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 

Jurnal Hukum Novelty Stats