Pemahaman Mahasiswa Tentang Multi Representasi Konsep Percepatan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/jrkpf.v4i2.6551Abstract
Kesulitan pemahaman konsep terkait percepatan dalam kinematika hingga kini masih dialami mahasiswa. Artikel ini membahas kesulitan umum yang dialami mahasiswa dalam memecahkan masalah konseptual terkait konsep percepatan dalam kinematika. Subyek penelitian terdiri atas 35 mahasiswa tahun pertama program studi pendidikan fisika yang mengikuti perkuliahan Fisika Dasar I tahun akademik 2016/2017. Analisis dilakukan berdasarkan jawaban mahasiswa terhadap soal pilihan ganda beserta alasannya. Penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa konsep percepatan berbagai representasi masih terindikasi miskonsepsi. Disarankan untuk dilakukan penelitian lanjutan untuk mengeksplorasi lebih dalam dan lebih autentik penyebab miskonsepsi tersebut, misalnya memberikan lebih banyak soal-soal latihan dan wawancara mendalam.
The difficulties of understanding concept related to acceleration in kinematics until now still experienced by students. This article discusses the general difficulties experienced by students in solving conceptual problems related to the concept of acceleration in kinematics. The subjects of the study consisted of 35 first year students of the physics education program that followed the Basic Physics I academic year 2016/2017. The analysis is based on student answers to multiple choice questions and reasons. The study concluded that the concept of acceleration of various representations is still indicated misconception. It is advisable to do further research to explore deeper and more authentic causes of these misconceptions, for example giving more practice questions and in-depth interviews.
Kata kunci: pemahaman konsep, percepatan
References
D. Hammer, Students resource for learningintroductory physics. American Journal of Physics, Physics EducationResearch Supplement, vol. 68, no. S1, 2000, pp. S52—S59.
J. L. Docktor, & J. P. Mestre, Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics. Physical Review Special Topic Physics Education Research, vol. 10, no. 2, 2014, pp. 1-58.
A. Pawl, Is it Disadvantageous to Teach Forces First in Mechanics?. American Association of Physics Teachers, vol 1119, no. 10, 2014, pp. 203-206.
D. Hestenes and M. Wells, A mechanics baseline test. Physics Teacher, vol. 30, no. 2, 1992, pp. 159-166.
D. E. Trowbridge & L. E. McDermott, Investigation of student understanding of the concept of velocity in one dimension. Physical Review Special Topic Physics Education Research, vol. 48, no. 12, 1980, pp. 1020-1028.
P. S. Shaffer & L. C. McDermott, A research-based approach to improving student understanding of the vector nature of kinematical concepts. American Journal Physics, vol. 73, no. 10, 2005, pp. 921-931.
V. Mesic, D. Dervic, A. Gazibegovic, Busuladzic, D. Salibasic, & N. Erceg, Comparing the Impact of Dynamic and Static Media on Students’ Learning of One-Dimensional Kinematics. Eurasia Journal of Matematics, Science & Technology Education, vol. 11, no. 5, 2015, pp. 1119-1140.
L. Ivanjek, A. Susac, M. Planinic & A. Andrasevic, Student reasoning about graphs in different contexts. Physical Review Special Topic Physics Education Research, vol. 12, no. 1, 2016, pp. 1-13.
Sutopo, Pembelajaran kinematika berbasis diagram gerak: Cara baru dalam pengajaran kinematika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Penerapan MIPA, Fakultas MIPA, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 2 Juni 2012.
F. Reif & S. Allen, S, Cognition for interpreting scientiï¬c concepts: A study of acceleration. Cognition and Instruction, vol. 9, no. 1, 1992, pp. 1-44.
Sutopo, Liliasari, Waldrib, & D. Rusdiana, Impact of Representrasional Approach on the Improvement of Students’ Understanding of Acceleration. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, vol. 8, 2012, pp. 161-173.
Sutopo, Improving Students’ Representational Skill and Generic Science Skill Using Representational Approach, Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, vol. 19, no. 1, 2012, pp. 1-21.
R. A. Serway, and J. W. Jewett, Physisc for Scientist and Engineers with Modern Physics. 9th Edition, California: Thomson Brooks/Cole, 2014.
A. Lichtenberger, C. Wagner, S. I. Hofer, E. Stern & A. Vaterlaus, Validation and structural analysis of the kinematics concept test. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, vol. 13, no. 1, 2017, pp. 1-13.
Sutopo & B. Waldrip, Impact of representational approach on students’ reason and conceptual understanding in learning mechanics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, vol. 12. No. 4, 2013, pp. 741-765.
R. J. Beichner, Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs, American Journal Physics, vol. 62, no. 8, 1994, pp. 750-762.
L. Bollen, M. D.Cock, & K. Zuza, Generalizing a Categorization of Students’ Interpretations of Linear Kinematics Graphs. Physical Review Physics Education Research, vol. 12, no. 1, 2016, pp. 1-10.
A. A. diSessa & B. L. Sherin, What change in conceptual change?, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 20, no. 10, 1998, pp. 1155-1191.
H. C. Sabo, L. M. Goodhew, & A. D. Robertson, University Student Conceptual Resources for Understanding Energy. Physical Review Physics Education Research, vol. 12. No. 1, 2016, pp. 1-28.
K. Jelicic, M. Plainic, & G. Planinsic, Analysing High School Students’ Reasoning about Electromagnetic Induction. Physical Review Physics Education Research, vol. 13, no. 1, 2017, pp. 1-18.
P. B. Kohl, & N. D. Finkelstein, Effect of Instructional Environment On Physics Students’ Representational Skills. Physical Review Special Topics Physics Education Research, vol. 2, no. 1, 2006, pp. 1-8.
R. D. Knight, Physics for scientis and engineers a strategic approach with modern physics, 3th edition, United States: Addison Wesley Longman, 2013.
D. Hestenes, M. Wells, & G. Swackhammer, Force concept inventory, Physics Teach, vol. 30, no. 1, 1992, pp. 141-158.
R. R. Hake, Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American journal of Physics, vol. 66. No. 1,1998, pp. 64-74.
Sutopo, Liliasari, Waldrib, & D. Rusdiana, Impact of Representrasional Approach on the Improvement of Student’s Understanding of Acceleration. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, vol. 8, 2012, pp. 161-173.
P. B.Kohl, D. Rosengrant, &N. D. Finkelstein, Strongly and weakly directed approaches to teaching multiple representation use in physics. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, vol. 3, no. 1, 2007, pp. 1-10.
David E. Meltzer, Relation between students’ problem solving performance and representation format, American Journal Physiscs., vol. 73, no. 5, 2005, pp. 463-478.
D. Wong, S. P. Poo, N. E. Hock, & W. L. Kang, Learning with multiple representations: an example of a revision lesson in mechanics, vol. 46, no. 2, 2011, pp. 178-186.
M. Planinic, Z. Milin-Sipus, H. Katic, A. Susac, and L. Ivanjek, Comparison of student understanding of
line graph slope in physics and mathematics, International. Journal. Science & Mathematics Education. Vol.10, 2012, pp.1393-1414.
T. Wemyss & P. van Kampen, Categorization of first-year university students’ interpretations of numerical linear distance-time graphs. Physical Review Special Topics Physics Education Research, vol. 9, no. 1, 2013, pp. 1-17.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
COPYRIGHT TRANSFER FORM
The copyright to this article is transferred to Universitas Ahmad Dahlan (UAD) if and when the article is accepted for publication. The undersigned hereby transfers any and all rights in and to the paper including without limitation all copyrights to UAD. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment.
We declare that:
- This paper has not been published in the same form elsewhere.
- It will not be submitted anywhere else for publication prior to acceptance/rejection by this Journal.
- A copyright permission is obtained for materials published elsewhere and which require this permission for reproduction.
Furthermore, I/We hereby transfer the unlimited rights of publication of the above mentioned paper in whole to UAD. The copyright transfer covers the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, micro form, electronic form (offline, online) or any other reproductions of similar nature.
The corresponding author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors. This agreement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable. After submission of this agreement signed by the corresponding author, changes of authorship or in the order of the authors listed will not be accepted.
Retained Rights/Terms and Conditions
- Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in the Work.
- Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the Work or derivative works for the authors personal use or for company use, provided that the source and the UAD copyright notice are indicated, the copies are not used in any way that implies UAD endorsement of a product or service of any employer, and the copies themselves are not offered for sale.
- Although authors are permitted to re-use all or portions of the Work in other works, this does not include granting third-party requests for reprinting, republishing, or other types of re-use.
