Peningkatan kemampuan memecahkan masalah antara model penalaran kausal berbasis etnosains dan sains modern
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/jrkpf.v3i2.5142Abstract
Penelitian ini betujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan kemampuan memecahkan masalah fisika antara model penalaran kausal berbasis etnosains dengan sains modern. penelitian ini menggunakan desain penelitian "The Non Equivalen Pretest-Postest Design". Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X pada MA Al-Khairaat Pusat Palu. Sampel dipilih secara Proportional Sample, dengan sampel penelitian adalah kelas XD dan kelas XC. Hasil analisa data yang diperoleh adalah kemampuan memecahkan masalah fisika kelas eksperimen pertama rata-rata 17,11 dengan standar deviasi 3,82 dan kelas eksperimen kedua rata-rata 14,30 dengan standar deviasi 4,07. Berdasarkan hasil pengujian hipotesis diperoleh thit = 2,03 dengan kriteria adalah terima Ho jika -2,02 < t < 2,02 dan tolak Ho dalam hal lainnya. nilai thitung berada di luar penerimaan Ho. Dengan demikian Ho ditolak sedangkan H1 diterima dan dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan kemampuan memecahkan masalah antara model penalaran kausal berbasis etnosains dengan sains modern.
This study aims to determine the difference between the ability to solve problems of physics-based models of causal reasoning etnosains with modern science. The design of this research study "The Non equivalent Pretest-Posttest Design". The study population was all students of class X in the MA Al-Khairaat Palu Center. Samples selected Proportional Sample, the sample is first class and the class XC XD. Results of analysis of the data obtained is the ability to solve the problem of experimental physics first class average of 17.11 with a standard deviation of 3.82 and the second experimental class average of 14.30 with a standard deviation of 4.07. Based on the hypothesis testing results obtained thit = 2.03 with the criteria is accept Ho if -2.02 <t <2.02 and reject Ho in other cases. tcount is outside the reception Ho. Thus Ho is rejected while H1 is accepted and concluded that there are differences between the models of problem-solving skills-based causal reasoning etnosains with modern science.
References
Aikenhead, G. S., & Jegede, O. J. 1999. “Cross-cultural Science Education: a Cognitive Explanation of a Cultural Phenomenonâ€, dalam Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
Poedjiadi, Anna. (2010). Sains Teknologi Masyarakat . Bandung : Rosda.
Suastra,I.W. 2005. Merekonstruksi Sains Asli dalam Rangka Mengembangkan Pendidikan Sains Berbasis Budaya Lokal di Sekolah. Disertasi. Tidak Dipublikasikan.
Carey, S. (2002). The Origin of Concepts: Continuing the Conversation. In N. L. Stein, P. J. Bauer, & M. Rabinowitz (Eds.), Representation, Memory, and Development: Essays in honor of Jean Mandler (pp. 43–52). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sunyono, Aryono. 1985. Kamus Antropologi. Akademika Pressindo. Jakarta.
Kelley, H. H. (1973). The Process of Causal Attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107–128.
Hung, and Jonassen. (2006). “Conceptual Understanding of Causal Reasoning in Physicsâ€. International Journal of Science Education. 28, (13), 1601-1621.
Sugiyono. 2009. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan (pendekatan Kunatitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Nurjannah. (2008). Pengaruh Penggunaan Model Penalaran Kausal dan Kolaborasi Terstruktur terhadap Kemampuan Mahasiswa Calon Guru dalam Memecahkan Masalah Medan Magnetik. Proceeding of The Second International Seminar on Science Education. Pendidikan IPA SPs UPI, Bandung, 2008.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
COPYRIGHT TRANSFER FORM
The copyright to this article is transferred to Universitas Ahmad Dahlan (UAD) if and when the article is accepted for publication. The undersigned hereby transfers any and all rights in and to the paper including without limitation all copyrights to UAD. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment.
We declare that:
- This paper has not been published in the same form elsewhere.
- It will not be submitted anywhere else for publication prior to acceptance/rejection by this Journal.
- A copyright permission is obtained for materials published elsewhere and which require this permission for reproduction.
Furthermore, I/We hereby transfer the unlimited rights of publication of the above mentioned paper in whole to UAD. The copyright transfer covers the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, micro form, electronic form (offline, online) or any other reproductions of similar nature.
The corresponding author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors. This agreement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable. After submission of this agreement signed by the corresponding author, changes of authorship or in the order of the authors listed will not be accepted.
Retained Rights/Terms and Conditions
- Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in the Work.
- Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the Work or derivative works for the authors personal use or for company use, provided that the source and the UAD copyright notice are indicated, the copies are not used in any way that implies UAD endorsement of a product or service of any employer, and the copies themselves are not offered for sale.
- Although authors are permitted to re-use all or portions of the Work in other works, this does not include granting third-party requests for reprinting, republishing, or other types of re-use.
