Analisis kemampuan berpikir kritis ditinjau dari keterampilan argumentasi siswa melalui model Argument Based Science Inquiry (ABSI)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/jrkpf.v7i2.17093Abstract
Abstrak. Berpikir kritis merupakan proses berpikir untuk menganalisis apa yang dimaksud dibalik informasi yang disampaikan. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui kemampuan berpikir kritis dan keterampilan argumentasi siswa melalui model pembelajaran Argument Based Science Inquiry (ABSI) dan pembelajaran berbasis inkuiri, serta mengetahui interaksi antara model pembelajaran ABSI dan keterampilan argumentasi siswa terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis. Penelitian dilaksanakan di salah satu sekolah negeri di Kota Malang pada semester genap 2019/2020. Populasi penelitian adalah peserta didik kelas X MIPA dan jumlah sampel terdiri dari enam puluh empat peserta didik yang terbagi dalam dua kelompok kelas yakni kelas eksperimen dan kelas kontrol. Teknik pengambilan data menggunakan tes kemampuan berpikir kritis dan mengukur keterampilan argumentasi menggunakan angket. Analisis data menggunakan anova dua jalur. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa (1) Kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa yang belajar melalui model pembelajaran ABSI lebih tinggi dari pada siswa yang belajar dengan pembelajaran berbasis inkuiri, (2) Kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa yang belajar melalui model pembelajaran ABSI lebih tinggi daripada siswa yang belajar dengan model pembelajaran berbasis inkuiri, (3) Tidak ada interaksi antara model pembelajaran ABSI dan keterampilan argumentasi siswa terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis.
Kata kunci: argument based science inquiry, berpikir kritis, keterampilan argumentasi
Abstract. Critical thinking is a thought process to analyze what is meant behind the information conveyed. This study aims to determine students 'critical thinking skills and argumentation skills through the Argument Based Science Inquiry (ABSI) learning model and inquiry-based learning and determine the interaction between the ABSI learning model and students' argumentation skills on critical thinking skills. The research was conducted at one of the public schools in Malang City in the even semester of 2019/2020. The study population was students of class X MIPA, and the sample size consisted of sixty-four students who were divided into two class groups, namely the experimental class and the control class. The data collection technique used critical thinking skills tests and measured argumentation skills using a questionnaire. Data analysis using two-way ANOVA. The results showed that (1) The critical thinking ability of students who learn through the ABSI learning model is higher than students who learn with inquiry-based learning, (2) The critical thinking ability of students who learn through the ABSI learning model is higher than students who learn using the ABSI learning model. Inquiry-based learning, (3) There is no interaction between the ABSI learning model and students' argumentation skills on critical thinking skills.
Keywords: argument based science inquiry, critical thinking, argumentation skillsReferences
Agnah, S. M., Rusdi, & Yanti, H. (2018). Pengaruh Metode Peta Argumen dan Efikasi Diri terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis. EduSains, 10(2), 217–225. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.15408/es.v10i2.7596
Angeline, V., Situmorang, R. P., & Sastrodihardjo, S. (2018). Korelasi Keterampilan Argumentasi dan Hasil Belajar Siska SMA Kristen Satya Wacana pada Materi Genetika dengan Model ABSI. JIPVA (Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Veteran), 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.31331/jipva.v2i1.539
Berland, L.K. & Hammer, D. (2012). Framing for Scientiï¬c Argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 49 (1): 68–94.
Budiyono, A. (2016). Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Argument Based Science Inquiry (ABSI) Terhadap Peningkatan Kemampuan Berargumentasi Siswa SMA. Wacana Didaktika. https://doi.org/10.31102/wacanadidaktika.4.1.84-93
Budiyono, A. (2016). Profil Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Argumen-Based Sains Inquiry ( ABSI ). 2016(Sehati), 16–17.
Budiyono, A., Rusdiana, D., & Kholida, S. I. (2015). Pembelajaran Argument Based Science Inquiry ( ABSI ) Pada Fisika. 2015(Snips), 205–208.
Chaeruman, U. (2010). E-Learning Dalam Pendidikan Fisika Jarak Jauh. Jakarta: Kemendiknas.
Corebima, AD. 2016. Pembelajaran Biologi di Indonesia Bukan Untuk Hidup. Proceeding Biology Education Conference. 13 (1). 8-22 .
Demirbag, M. (2014). Integrating Argument-Based Science Inquiry with Modal Representations : Impact on Science Achievement , Argumentation , and Writing Skills *. 14(1), 386–391. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.1.1632
Erika, Farah & Binar K. Prahani. 2017. Innovative Chemistry Learning Model to Improve Argumentation Skills and Self-Efficacy. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 7 (2): 62-68.
Faiqoh, N., Khasanah, N., Astuti, L. P., Prayitno, R., & Prayitno, B. A. (2018). Profil Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa Kelas X dan XI MIPA di SMA Batik 1 Surakarta pada Materi Keanekaragaman Hayati. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 7(3), 174. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpb.v7i3.10122
Ginanjar, W. S., Utari, S., & Indonesia, U. P. (n.d.). PENERAPAN MODEL ARGUMENT-DRIVEN INQUIRY DALAM PEMBELAJARAN IPA UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN ARGUMENTASI ILMIAH SISWA SMP. (1), 1–6.
Hafinah, N., Admoko, S. (2019). Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika ISSN : 2302-4496 ISSN : 2302-4496 Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika ISSN : 2302-4496 ISSN : 2302-4496. 08(02), 593–597.
Hayatun, N., Undang, R., Kartini, H., & Neni, H. (2018). Pengaruh penerapan model argument driven inquiry terhadap ketrampilan berfikir kritis siswa SMP berdasarkan perbezaan kemampuan akademik. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 7(2), 110–117.
Khusnayain, A. (2017). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Siswa Berbasis Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) Untuk Menumbuhkan Keterampilan Argumentasi Ilmiah. [tesis]. Universitas Lampung
Ompusunggu, T., Turnip, B. M., & Sirait, M. (2016). Efek Inquiry Training Dan Berpikir Kritis Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan FISIKA, 5(2). Retrieved from http://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/jpf.
Putra, D. J., Hasnunidah, N., & Jalmo, T. (2019). Pengaruh Argument Driven Inquiry Terhadap Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa pada Materi Sistem Pernapasan. Jurnal Bioterdidik, 7(1), 1–10.
Saputri, E., Syafi, W., & Elya, F. (2018). The Implementation of Guided Inquiry Learning Model to Increase Critical Thinking Ability on Biology Learning at Class X SMAN 9 Pekanbaru. Jom Fkip, 5, 1–10.
Siswanto, Kaniawati, I & Suhandi, A. (2014). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Pembangkit Argumen Menggunakan Metode Saintifik Untuk Meningkatkan Emampuan Kognitif Dan Keterampilan Berargumentasi Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia. 10 (2), Hlm. 104-116
Subarkah, C. Z., Fadilah, A., & Aisyah, R. (2017). Argument Based Science Inquiry (ABSI) Learning Model in Voltaic Cell Concept. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012008
Syifa’ul Amamah, dkk. (2016). Proses Berpikir Siswa SMP Bergaya Kognitif Field Dependent
Tabares, I., Sukmaningrum, P. S., Performance, F., Insurance, I., Pendahuluan, I., Belakang, L.,Tabares, I. (2013). Pengaruh Esar (Engage, Study, Activate, Reflect) Terhadap Kemampuan Analisis Dan Argumentasi Ilmiah. Jurnal Teknologi, 1(1), 69–73. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v56.60
Williams, J. W. (2014). Gender Differences in School Children’s Self Affiicacy Beliefs: Student’s and Teacher’s Perspectives. Journal academic. PP,9 (8), 75- 82.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
COPYRIGHT TRANSFER FORM
The copyright to this article is transferred to Universitas Ahmad Dahlan (UAD) if and when the article is accepted for publication. The undersigned hereby transfers any and all rights in and to the paper including without limitation all copyrights to UAD. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment.
We declare that:
- This paper has not been published in the same form elsewhere.
- It will not be submitted anywhere else for publication prior to acceptance/rejection by this Journal.
- A copyright permission is obtained for materials published elsewhere and which require this permission for reproduction.
Furthermore, I/We hereby transfer the unlimited rights of publication of the above mentioned paper in whole to UAD. The copyright transfer covers the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, micro form, electronic form (offline, online) or any other reproductions of similar nature.
The corresponding author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors. This agreement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable. After submission of this agreement signed by the corresponding author, changes of authorship or in the order of the authors listed will not be accepted.
Retained Rights/Terms and Conditions
- Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in the Work.
- Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the Work or derivative works for the authors personal use or for company use, provided that the source and the UAD copyright notice are indicated, the copies are not used in any way that implies UAD endorsement of a product or service of any employer, and the copies themselves are not offered for sale.
- Although authors are permitted to re-use all or portions of the Work in other works, this does not include granting third-party requests for reprinting, republishing, or other types of re-use.
