How Do College Students Solve Logarithm Questions?
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to investigate college students' work with logarithm questions. Qualitative descriptive research is chosen to reach the research goal. The participants of the study were fourteen Indonesian students who were enrolled at different universities in Ankara, Turkey. They worked to solve ten logarithm questions which were classified according to the contents. After analysing their written responses, interviews were conducted to obtain further explanation about their strategies and common mistakes. The study found that participants' works in dealing with logarithm questions comprised of (a) processing base, (b) holding the rule, (c) separating, (d) jumping, and (e) conditioning. Therewith, several participants made common mistake because of misconception about logarithm, arithmetical problems, and misuse of algebra concept. Implication of the finding of the study for teaching and learning logarithm were presented.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Berezovski, T., & Zazkis, R. (2006). Logarithms: Snapshots from two tasks. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 145.
Chazan, D. (1996). Algebra for all students? Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15, 455-477.
Chua, B.L., & Wood, E. (2005). Working with logarithms: students' misconceptions and errors. The Mathematics Educator, 8(2), 53-70.
Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Research design Qualitative quantitative and mixed methods approaches. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2.
Fauvel, J. (1995). Revisiting the history of logarithms. In F. Swetz, J. Fauvel, O. Bekken, B. Johansson, & V. Katz (Eds.), Learn from the masters (pp. 39-48). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. Educational Communication & Technology, 30(4), 233-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765185.
Hoon, T.S., Singh, P., & Ayop, S.K. (2010). Working with Logarithms. Malaysian Education Dean's Council Journal, 6(6).
Katz, V.J. (1995). Napier's logarithms adapted for today's classroom. In F. Swetz, J. Fauvel, O. Bekken, B. Johansson, & V. Katz (Eds.), Learn from the masters (pp. 49-55). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
Kaur, B., & Sharon, B.H.P. (1994). Algebraic Misconceptions of First Year College Students. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 16(4), 43-58.
Menary, R. (2007). Writing as thinking. Language Sciences, 29(5), 621-632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2007.01.005.
Panagiotou, E.N. (2011). Using history to teach mathematics: The case of logarithms. Science & Education, 20(1), 1-35.
Panagiotou, E.N. (2011). Using history to teach mathematics: The case of logarithms. Science & Education, 20(1), 1-35.
Star R.J. (2005). Reconceptualizing Procedural Knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(5), 404-411. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034943
Usiskin, Z. (1995). Why is Algebra Important To Learn? American Educator.
Williams, H.R.A. (2011). A Conceptual Framework for Student Understanding of Logarithms. Brigham Young University. Retrieved from http://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/3123.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v1i1.5736
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 Yoppy Wahyu Purnomo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education
Kampus 2 Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
Jalan Pramuka No. 42, Pandeyan, Umbulharjo, Yogyakarta - 55161
Telp. (0274) 563515, ext. 4902; Fax. (0274) 564604
Email: ijeme@uad.ac.id
p-ISSN: 2549-4996 | e-ISSN: 2548-5806
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License