The Impact of Think Pair Share Model on Mathematics Learning in Elementary Schools

Shila Majid Ardiyani

Abstract


One objective of mathematics learning is to solve problem and to communicate idea to get a solution. Human life is inseparable from social activity, including cooperation. Similarly, in mathematics learning sometimes students need friends to discuss with in solving mathematics problem. Cooperative learning model can be an alternative to bridge the difficulty the students encounter. The objective of research was to identify the impact of Think Pair Share type of Cooperative learning model on mathematics learning in elementary school. This study was a descriptive qualitative research. The subject of research was the fifth graders of three elementary schools in Karangpandan Sub District. Techniques of collecting data used were observation, interview, and documentation. Observation was conducted to observe the learning process using Think Pair Share-type of cooperative learning, interview to find out the impression and the impact the students experience, and documentation to find out the group’s work. The conclusion of research showed that there are some impacts found in mathematics learning using Think Pair Share type of cooperative learning related to: (1) group establishment; (2) learning environment; (3) learning achievement; (4) student participation; (5) information exchange; and (6) interpersonal relation.

Keywords


Cooperative Learning; Think Pair Share; Mathematics Learning

References


Depdiknas, “Permendiknas No. 22 Tahun 2006 tentang Standar Isi untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah,” ed Jakarta: Depdiknas, 2006.

S. J. V. Kumar and D. B. Rao, “Techniques of Teaching Mathematics,” ed New Delhi: Sonali Publications, 2006.

L. S. Vygotsky, “Thought and Language,” ed USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1986.

Eggen, P. and Kauchak, D, “Strategi dan Model Pembelajaran: Mengajarkan Konten dan Keterampilan Berpikir, “ed Jakarta: PT Indeks, 2012).

Tint, S. S., & Nyunt, E. E., “Collaborative learning with think -pair - share technique,” Computer Applications: An International Journal (CAIJ), vol.2, 2015,pp. 1–11, 2015

Slavin, R. E, “Research on Cooperative Learning and Achievement: What We Know, What We Need to Know,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol.21, pp. 43-69, 1996.

Gull, F.’ “Effect of Cooperative Learning on Students’ Academic Achievement,” Journal of Education and Learning, vol. 9, pp. 246-255, 2015.

Kothiyal, A., dkk, “Effect of Think-Pair-Share in a Large CS1 Class : 83 % Sustained Engagement,” International Computing Education Research (ICER), vol. 13, pp. 1-8, 2013.

Martha, M., Prof, I. E., & Seraphina, M. (n.d.), “Effect Of Think-Pair-Share Strategy On Secondary School Mathematics Students’ Achievement and Academic Self-Esteem in Fractions,” American International Journal of Contemporary Scientific Research, vol. 2, pp. 141–147. 2015.

Lie, A, “Cooperative Learning,” ed Jakarta: Grasindo, 2002.

Chauhan, MS. S., “Cooperative Learning Versus Competitive Learning: Which Is Better?,” International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, vol. 2, pp. 358-364 , 2012.

Aziz, Z., & Hossain, M. A, “A Comparison of Cooperative Learning and Conventional Teaching on Student’s Achievement in Secondary Mathematics,” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 9, pp. 53–62, 2010.

Ventigmiglia, L., “Cooperative learning at the college level,” Thought and Action, vol. 9, pp. 5-30, 1994.

Roger T. and David W. Johnson, “An Overview of Cooperative Learning,” online, 2002.

Slavin, R. E., “Cooperative Learning: Teori, Riset dan Praktik,” ed Bandung: Nusa Media, 2005.

Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T, Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning, Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12, 1978, 3–15.

David W. Johnson and Roger T. Johnson, “Making Cooperative Learning Work,” Building Community through Cooperative Learning, vol. 38, pp. 67-73, 1999.

Kagan, S. and Kagan, M., “Kagan Cooperative Learning,” ed San Clemente: Kagan Publishing, 1994.

Morgan, B., “Cooperative learning in higher education: Undergraduate student reflections on group examinations for group grades,” College Student Journal, vol. 37, pp. 40-50, 2003.

Dyson, B., & Grineski, S., “Using cooperative learning structures in physical education,” Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance, vol. 72, pp. 28-31, 2001.

Ejiwale, J., “Barriers to successful implementation of STEM education,” Journal of Education and Learning, vol. 7, pp. 63-74, 2013.

Li, M. P. & Lam, B. H., “Cooperative Learning,” ed Hong Kong: Institut Pendidikan Hong Kong, 2005.

Kohn, A., “Resistance to cooperative learning: Making sense of it deletion and dilution,” Journal of Education, vol.174, pp. 38-56, 1992.

Kolawole, E. B., “Effects of competitive and cooperative learning strategies on academic performance of Nigerian students in mathematics,” Educational Research and Review, vol. 3, pp. 033-037, 2008.

Othman, H., dkk., “Students’ Perceptions on Benefits Gained from Cooperative Learning Experiences in Engineering Mathematics Courses”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 60, pp. 500–506, 2012.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v13i1.8427

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.


Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn)
ISSN: 2089-9823, e-ISSN 2302-9277
Published by: Universitas Ahmad Dahlan (UAD) in collaboration with Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science (IAES)

View EduLearn Stats