Cloze Test Pocket Worksheet as Aid to Mastery of Science Concepts
This study used a Two Groups, Random Selection Experimental Design to improved academic performance of Grade 9 learners of Silanga National High School Catbalogan City using Cloze Test Pocket Worksheet in Science. Its purpose was to seek answers to the following questions: (1) What is the pretest mean scores between the control and experimental group? (2) What is the posttest mean scores of the control and experimental group? (3) What is the mean gain scores of the selected experimental group before and after the conduct of the study? Based on the result, the following findings were formulated; (1) The pretest mean scores of the subjects using Cloze Test Pocket Woksheet and the pretest mean scores of those who did not used do not differ significantly. (2) The post-test means scores of subjects who were were using Cloze Test Pocket Woksheet and the posttest mean scores of the subjects who were not using Cloze Test Pocket Woksheet differ significantly. (3) There is a significant difference between the mean gain scores of the two groups of samples – experimental and control groups. The experimental group who used Cloze Test Pocket Woksheet performed significantly higher than the control group who were not using the Cloze Test Pocket Woksheet. Based on the findings cited, it is concluded that the developed material in reviewing Science can improve learners’ mastery of the concepts. Though the results of this study showed that learning took place in both groups, the subjects who were assessed by Cloze Test Pocket Worksheet performed significantly better than the subjects who did not use the material.
Hoffman, Sandy. Why students forget What they’ ve Learned and How to Increase Learning Retention. Reading Horizons.
Guskey TR. Lessons of mastery learning. Educational leadership. 2010;68(2):52.
Guskey, Thomas R. Mastery-Based Educational Approach.
Pasha, Saba. FORGETTING - Concept, Types, Causes, Educational Implications.
Nielsen J. Cloze test for reading comprehension. Retrieved on October. 2017; 15:2017.
Mullet K, Sano D. Designing visual interfaces: Communication oriented techniques. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): SunSoft Press; 1995 Apr.
Shohamy EG. The Cloze Procedure and Its Applicability for Testing Hebrew as a Foreign Language.
Michelon P. Brain plasticity: How learning changes your brain. Retrieved August. 2016; 24:2009.
Sink CA, Stroh HR. Raising achievement test scores of early elementary school students through comprehensive school counseling programs. Professional school counseling. 2003 Jun 1;6(5):350-64.
Todd L. Using cloze tests to assess the reading needs of EAL learners.
Mcgee LM. Effects of the Cloze Procedure on Good and Poor Readers' Comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior. 1981 Jun;13(2):145-56.
Sasaki M. Effects of cultural schemata on students' test-taking processes for cloze tests: a multiple data source approach. Language Testing. 2000 Jan;17(1):85-114.
Brown JD, Yamashiro AD, Ogane E. The emperor’s new cloze: strategies for revising cloze tests. A focus on language test development: Expanding the language proficiency construct across a variety of tests. 2001:143-61.
Raymond PM. Close Procedure in the Teaching of Reading. TESL Canada journal. 1988 Oct 26;6(1):91- 7.
Taylor WL. “Cloze procedure”: A new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Bulletin. 1953 Sep;30(4):415-33.
Kaminsky S. Taking a closer look at the cloze procedure. Literacy Research and Instruction. 1979 Oct 1;19(1):12-8
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn)
ISSN: 2089-9823, e-ISSN 2302-9277
Published by: Universitas Ahmad Dahlan (UAD) in collaboration with Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science (IAES)