The role of reciprocal actions of giving and receiving support on eudaimonic workplace well-being

Sartika Ria Febrina, Alice Salendu

Abstract


Employee well-being is gaining increasing attention from various quarters. Studies related to the relationship between reciprocal actions of social support and individual well-being tend to be conducted separately. Additionally, the relationship between receiving support from colleagues and employee well-being also tends to show relatively low to moderate associations. Therefore, this research aims to examine the role of the dynamic reciprocity of social actions in well-being, through an investigation of the mediating role of organization citizenship behavior toward individuals (OCB-I) in the relationship between perceived co-worker support (PCS) and eudaimonic workplace well-being (EWWB). The research participants were active workers who had been working for a minimum of 1 year in their current organization, gathered through convenience sampling techniques. Mediation analysis results indicate that OCB-I significantly mediates the relationship between PCS and EWWB, thus supporting the hypothesis of this research. This study demonstrates the role of social interaction, particularly the dynamics of support among employees, in relation to employee well-being.

Keywords


Eudaimonic workplace well-being, organization citizenship behavior toward individuals, Perceived co-worker support

Full Text:

PDF

References


Future Workplace. (2021). Future workplace 2021 HR sentiment survey: Five strategic priorities for the hybrid workplace.

Kropp. B. (2021. April 26). 9 Work trends that HR leaders can’t ignore in 2021. Gartner.

International Labour Organization. (t.t.). Workplace well-being. Diambil 10 November 2021.

Bartels. A. L.. Peterson. S. J.. & Reina. C. S. (2019). Understanding well-being at work: Development and validation of the eudaimonic workplace well-being scale. PLOS ONE. 14(4). e0215957.

Turban. D. B.. & Yan. W. (2016). Relationship of eudaimonia and hedonia with work outcomes. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 31(6). 1006–1020.

Wang. X.. Li. A.. Liu. P.. & Rao. M. (2018). The relationship between psychological detachment and employee well-being: The mediating effect of self-discrepant time allocation at work. Frontiers in Psychology. 9.

Zhang. X.. Lin. Z.. Liu. Y.. Chen. X.. & Liu. D. M. (2020). How do human resource management practices affect employee well-being. A mediated moderation model. Employee Relations: The International Journal. 42(4). 903–919.

Arnold. J.. Randall. R.. Patterson. F.. Silvester. J.. Robertson. I.. Cooper. C.. Burnes. B.. Harris. D.. & Axtell. C. (2016). Work psychology: Understanding human behaviour in the workplace (6 ed.). Pearson Education.

Biggio. G.. & Cortese. ClaudioG. (2013). Well-being in the workplace through interaction between individual characteristics and organizational context. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being. 8(1). 19823.

Sutton. A. (2021). Work psychology in action (2 ed.). Macmillan Education.

Mensah. A. (2021). Job stress and mental well-being among working men and women in Europe: The mediating role of social support. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 18(5). 2494.

Wepfer. A. G.. Allen. T. D.. Brauchli. R.. Jenny. G. J.. & Bauer. G. F. (2018). Work-life boundaries and well-being: Does work-to-life integration impair well-being through lack of recovery. Journal of Business and Psychology. 33(6). 727–740.

Taris. T. W.. & Schaufeli. W. B. (2014). Individual well-being and performance at work: A conceptual and theoretical overview. Dalam M. van Veldhoven & R. Peccei (Ed.). Well-being and Performance at Work (hlm. 15–34). Psychology Press.

Biswas. T.. Mäkelä. L.. & Andresen. M. (2022). Work and non-work-related antecedents of expatriates’ well-being: A meta-analysis. Human Resource Management Review. 32(3). 100889.

Curry. O. S.. Rowland. L. A.. Van Lissa. C. J.. Zlotowitz. S.. McAlaney. J.. & Whitehouse. H. (2018). Happy to help. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of performing acts of kindness on the well-being of the actor. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 76. 320–329.

Titova. L.. & Sheldon. K. M. (2021). Happiness comes from trying to make others feel good. rather than oneself. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 17(1). 1–15.

Fisher. C. D. (2014). Conceptualizing and measuring wellbeing at work. Dalam P. Y. Chen & C. L. Cooper (Ed.). Work and wellbeing: Vol. III (hlm. 9–33). Wiley.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12928/empathy.v6i2.27360

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Sartika Ria Febrina & Alice Salendu

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

================================================================================================

ISSN 2303-114X (print) |2714-786X (online)
Organized by the Faculty of Psychology
Published by Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta
Website: http://journal.uad.ac.id/index.php/EMPATHY

email: empathy.jfp@psy.uad.ac.id

================================================================================================

Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional

View My Stats