Discovery Learning untuk Meningkatkan Kuantitas dan Kualitas Pertanyaan dan Pernyataan Siswa SMA pada Pembelajaran Biologi

Almira Rahma, Sri Widoretno, Nurmiyati Nurmiyati

Abstract


Penelitian bertujuan meningkatkan kuantitas dan kualitas pertanyaan dan pernyataan siswa melalui penerapan discovery learning pada pembelajaran biologi SMA. Penelititan dilakukan selama 3 siklus, dengan subjek penelitian adalah 28 siswa kelas XI IPS 1 SMA Negeri 5 Surakarta. Data diperoleh dari observasi proses pembelajaran, wawancara, dan dokumentasi. Validasi data menggunakan teknik triangulasi. Teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis kualitatif. Analisa pertanyaan dan pernyataan menggunakan rubrik Taksonomi Bloom terevisi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terjadi peningkatan kuantitas dan kualitas pertanyaan dan pernyataan siswa pada pembelajaran biologi dengan penerapan discovery learning. Peningkatan kuantitas merupakan pertambahan jumlah pertanyaan dan pernyataan dari baseline sebanyak 65 pertanyaan dan 157 pernyataan. Masing-masing siklus ditunjukkan dengan pertambahan pertanyaan dan pernyataan dari baseline yang diperoleh dari hasil observasi sebanyak 29 pertanyaan dan 56 pernyataan menjadi 84 pertanyaan dan 213 pernyataan di siklus 1, 88 pertanyaan dan 157 pernyataan di siklus 2, serta 94 pertanyaan dan 208 pernyataan di siklus 3. Peningkatan kualitas  merupakan pertambahan tingkat kognitif yang ditunjukkan dengan pergeseran proses berpikir dari C2 menjadi C5, serta pergeseran dimensi faktual menjadi dimensi pengetahuan di siklus 1, siklus 2, dan siklus 3. Kesimpulan dari penelitian adalah penerapan model discovery learning mampu meningkatkan kuantitas dan kualitas pertanyaan dan pernyataan siswa SMA pada pembelajaran biologi.

Keywords


pertanyaan, pernyataan, discovery learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alfieri, L., Aldrich, N. J., Brooks, P. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2011). Does discoverybased learning enhance instruction? of Educational Psychology , 103 (1), 1-18.

Almeida, P. A. (2011). Critical Thinking, Questioning and Creativity as Components of Intelligence. Social and Behavioral Sciences. 30, pp. 357-362. Aveiro, Portugal: Elsevier Ltd

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., et al. (2001). Kerangka Landasan untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Asesmen. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Barnett, J. E., & Francis, A. L. (2012). Using Higher Order Thinking Questions to Foster Critical Thinking: A Classroom Study. of Experimental Educational Psychology , 32 (2), 201-211.

Blackwell, W. (2015). Discovery Based Learning in the Life Science Kathleen M. Susman. New Jersey: Hoboken.

Chin, C. (2004). Students' questions: Fostering a Culture of Inquisitiveness in Science Classroom. School Science Review , 86 (314), 107-112.

Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2010). Students Questions and Discursive Interaction: Their Impact on Argumentation During Collaborative Group Discussions in Science. of Research in Science Teaching , 47(7), 883-908.

Cho, Y. H., Lee, S. Y., Jeong, D. W., Im, S. J., Choi, E. J., Lee, S. H., et al. (2012). Analysis of Questioning Technique During Classes in Medical Education. BMC Medical Education , pp. 1-7.

Clough, M. P. (Ed.). (2007). What is So Important About Asking Questions? Iowa Science Teachers , 34 (1).

Marin, L. M., & Halpern, D. F. (2011). Pedagogy for Developing Critical Thinking in Adolescents: Explicit Instruction Produces Greatest Gains. Thinking Skills and Creativity , 6, 1-13.

Mayer, R. E. (2009, August 26). Clickers in college classrooms: Fostering learning with questioning methods in large lecture classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology , 34, pp. 51-57

Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why Do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 34 (2), 57-111.

Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2012). An Evaluation of Argument Mapping as A Method of Enhancing Critical Thinking Performance in E-learning Environments. Metacognitive Learning , 7, 219-244.

Jean, C. M., Carron, T., & Pernelle, &. P. (2012). Observe And React: Interactive Indicators for Monitoring Pedagogical Sessions. Int. J. Learning Technology , 7 (3), 277-296.

Kunsting, J., Kempf, J., & Wirth, J. (2013). Enhancing Scientific Discovery Learning Through Metacognitive Support. Contemporary Educational Psychology , 38, 349-360.

Kwan, Y. W., & Wong, A. F. (2015). Effects of The Constructivist Learning Environment on Students Critical Thinking Ability: Cognitive and Motivational Variables as Mediator. International of Educational Research , 70, 68-79.

Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The Role of Metacognitive Knowledge in Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. College of Education, The Ohio State University , 41 (4).

Rahmawati, A. N., Widoretno, S., Suciati, Sajidan, & Ariyanto, J. (2015). Peningkatan Kuantitas dan Kualitas Pertanyaan Peserta Didik melalui Penerapan Discovery Learning pada Pembelajaran di Kelas XI MIPA 4 SMA N 7 Surakarta.

Rodzalana, S. A., & Saat, M. M. (2015). The Perception of Critical Thinking and Problem Solving Skill Among Malaysian Undergraduate Students. Social and Behavioral Sciences. 172, pp. 725-732. Kuala Lumpur: Elsevier.

Rustaman, N. (2007). Ilmu dan Aplikasi Pendidikan. Bandung: PT. Imperial Bakti Utama.

Saavedra, A. R., & Opfer, V. D. (2012). Teaching and learning 21st Century Skills : Lesson from The Learning Science. Asia Society Partnership for Global Learning: RAND Corporation.

Sarabeth, W. (2013). The Effects Of Brainscapes Confidence-Based Repition On Two. Masters Project, Fredonia, New York.

Sim, L. L. (2013). An inquiry of Teachers Perception on The Relationship Between Higher Order Thinking Nurturing and Liberal Studies Public Assessment in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Teachers Centre , 12, 183-215.

Thomas, R., Dougherty, M. R., & Buttaccio, D. R. (2014). Memory Constraints on Hypothesis Generation and Decision Making. Current Directions in Psychological , 23 (4), 264-270.

Veermans, K. (2002 ). Intelligent Support for Discovery Learning. Enschede, The Netherlands: Twente University Press.

Williams, J. J., & Lombrozo, T. (2010). The Role of Explanation in Discovery and Generalization: Evidence From Category Learning. Cognitive Science A Multidisciplinary , 34, 776-806




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26555/bioedukatika.v5i1.5440

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View J.Bioedukatika Stats

JURNAL BIOEDUKATIKA
ISSN 2338-6630 (Print) | ISSN 2541-5646 (Online)
Organized by Department of Biology Education
Published by Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
Jl.Ringroad Selatan, dk Kragilan, Tamanan, Banguntapan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia