THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PAIR CHECK TYPE OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL AND THE THINK PAIR SHARE ON THE LEARNING OUTCOMES

Hendun Prayogi, Romelan Hamzah

Abstract


This study aims to determine whether or not the differences between mathematics learning outcomes with cooperative learning model of pair check and think pair share types and to compare the effectiveness of the two types in mathematics learning outcomes of students grade VII in even semester at Junior High School (SMP) Muhammadiyah 9 Yogyakarta in the academic year 2018/2019. This study is an experimental research that consists of experimental class 1 and experimental 2. The population is the student's class VII at SMP Muhammadiyah 9 Yogyakarta in 2018/2019. The sample was taken from 2 classes using a purposive sampling technique. The data collection technique in this study was using a method of learning outcomes tests and documentation. Before analyzing the data, a prerequisite test consisting of a normality test and testing the hypothesis in this study, two parties t-test were used with a significance level of 5%. The research outcomes at a significance level of 5% and df = 53 indicate no difference in mathematics learning outcomes using the cooperative learning model type of pair check with mathematics learning model type of think pair share. This is supported by the results of data analysis from the hypothesis test using the t-test. The results are , so it can be concluded that , so H0 is accepted, and H1 is rejected.


Keywords


Effectiveness, Pair Check, Think Pair Share, and Mathematics Learning Outcomes.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto,Suharsimi. 2013. Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.

________________. 2014. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta : PT Rineka Cipta.

Isjoni. 2012. Pembelajaran kooperatif meningkatkan kecerdasan komunikasi antar peserta didik. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.

____. 2013. “Cooperative Learning Mengembangkan Kemampuan Belajar Berkelompok. Bandung : Alfabeta.

Mulyatiningsih, Endang. 2014. Metode Penelitian Terapan Bidang Pendidikan. Bandung : Alfabeta.

Shoimin, Aris. 2016. 68 Model Pembelajaran novatif dalam Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta : Ar-Ruz Media.

Sudjana, Nana. 2012. Penilaian Hasil Proses belajar mengajar. Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sugiyono. 2018. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitaif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung : Alfabeta.

Suryabrata, Sumadi. 1985. Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta : CV. Rajawali.

Trianto. 2011. Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif-Progresif: Konsep, Landasan, dan Implementasinya pada Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Nasional (KTSP). Jakarta : Kencana.

UNDANG-UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NO. 14 TAHUN 2005 dan PERATURAN PEMERINTAH RI NO. 74 TAHUN 2008 tentang GURU dan Dosen, 2009, Bandung : Citra Umbara ( hal. 59 dan 64 ).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12928/admathedust.v6i5.19261

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


 
AdMathEduSt: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika
ISSN 2355-8199 (print) | 2775-5746 (online)
Organized by Mathematics Education Study Program
Faculty of Teacher Training and Education - Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
Published by Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
Website: http://journal.uad.ac.id/index.php/AdMathEdust/index
Email 1: harina.fitriyani@pmat.uad.ac.id
Email 2: admathedust@pmat.uad.ac.id
Office Address: Kantor Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, Lantai 7, Kampus 4 UAD, Jl. Ringroad Selatan, Tamanan, Kec. Banguntapan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55191, Indonesia

 

Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.